Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Relation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groups

dc.contributor.authorPaez Logreira, Heyder Davidspa
dc.contributor.authorZamora Musa, Ronaldspa
dc.contributor.authorVelez Zapata, Jaimespa
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T19:27:55Z
dc.date.available2018-11-15T19:27:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-27
dc.identifier.issn07182724spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11323/1045spa
dc.description.abstractKnowledge is a competitive advantage for companies. Knowledge Management helps to keep this competitiveness. Universities face with challenges in research, innovation and international competitiveness. The purpose of this paper includes studying Knowledge Management Models, and Innovation Models apply to Research Groups of Universities, through an analysis of relation in inter-organizational level. Some researchers and leaders of research groups participated in a survey about knowledge management and innovation. Here we show the relationship between knowledge management, innovation and research, including processes and operations performed by universities around these. We organize the results in three dimensions: Knowledge Management perception, the relationship between Knowledge Management and Innovation, and Strategic Knowledge organization. Too, we identify a generality of good practices, challenges, and limitations on Research Groups for Knowledge Management.spa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJournal of Technology Management and Innovationspa
dc.rightsAtribución – No comercial – Compartir igualspa
dc.subjectInnovationeng
dc.subjectKnowledge managementeng
dc.subjectResearcheng
dc.subjectResearch groupeng
dc.subjectUniversityeng
dc.titleRelation analysis of knowledge management, research, and innovation in university research groupseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.referencesAzagra-Caro, J. M. (2004). La contribución de las universidades a la innovación: efectos del fomento de la interación universidad-empresa y las patentes universitarias. Universitat de València. Campos, E. B., Ortega, P. M., Pomeda, J. R., de la Torre, M. A. L., Oliver, M. C., Mancilla, C. C., ... & Mártil, L. V. (2003). Gestión del Conocimiento en Universidades y Organismos públicos de Investigación. Chen, L., & Mohamed, S. (2007). Empirical Approach to Understand the Knowledge Management Process. Accelerating Innovation in Engineering, Management and Technology, 525–532. Coukos-Semmel, E. (2003). Knowledge Management in Research Universities: The Processes and Strategies. Dalmarco, G., Dewes, M. de F., Zawislak, P. A., & Padula, A. D. (2011). Universities’ Intellectual Property: Path for Innovation or Patent Competition? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 159–170. Development, O. for E. C. and. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. OECD. Devi Ramachandran, S., Chong, S.-C., & Wong, K.-Y. (2013). Knowledge management practices and enablers in public universities: a gap analysis. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 76–94. Farzin, M. R., Kahreh, M. S., Hesan, M., & Khalouei, A. (2014). A Survey of Critical Success Factors for Strategic Knowledge Management Implementation: Applications for Service Sector. 2nd World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, 109, 595–599. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.512 Gillian Ragsdell, D., Rathi, D., Given, L. M., & Forcier, E. (2016). Knowledge needs in the non-profit sector: an evidence-based model of organizational practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(1), 23–48. Godin, B., & Lane, J. P. (2013). Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(5), 621–654. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912473163 Groff, T., & Jones, T. (2012). Introduction to Knowledge Management. Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/ books?id=GR26rZA6wrcC Honarpour, A., Jusoh, A., & Md Nor, K. (2012). Knowledge management, total quality management and innovation: A new look. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(3), 22–31. Huang, K.-T., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1998). Quality information and knowledge. Prentice Hall PTR. Jabbary, N., & Madhoshi, M. (2014). Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Academic Communities: Grounded Theory. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 126–136. Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). Chain-linked model of innovation. An Overview of Innovation: The Positive Sum Strategy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, US. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203. Liao, S.-H., & Wu, C. (2010). System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1096–1103. Lindenhall, I., Väisänen, K., Soriano, V., & Miguel, C. (2014). Challenges in Internal Knowledge Transfer: A case study of KPMG and Grant Thornton. Lopes Ferreira, C., & Pilatti, L. A. (2013). Analysis of the Seven Dimensions of Knowledge Management in Organizations. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8, 5–5. Matayong, S., & Mahmood, A. K. (2013). The review of approaches to knowledge management system studies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 472–490. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight. com/doi/abs/10.1108/JKM-10-2012-0316 Myers, S., & Marquis, D. G. (1969). Successful industrial innovation. Institute of Public Administration. Nonaka, I., Kodama, M., Hirose, A., & Kohlbacher, F. (2014). Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory. European Management Journal, 32(1), 137–146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.02.003 Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com. co/books?id=tmziBwAAQBAJ Obeidat, B. Y., Masa’deh, R. (Moh’d T., & Abdallah, A. B. (2014). The Relationships among Human Resource Management Practices, Organizational Commitment, and Knowledge Management Processes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3). http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n3p9 Oliveira, M., & Pedron, C. D. (2014). Maturity Model for Knowledge Management and Strategic Benefits. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. 2, p. 748). Academic Conferences International Limited. Nonaka, I., Kodama, M., Hirose, A., & Kohlbacher, F. (2014). Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory. European Management Journal, 32(1), 137–146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.02.003 Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com. co/books?id=tmziBwAAQBAJ Obeidat, B. Y., Masa’deh, R. (Moh’d T., & Abdallah, A. B. (2014). The Relationships among Human Resource Management Practices, Organizational Commitment, and Knowledge Management Processes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(3). http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n3p9 Oliveira, M., & Pedron, C. D. (2014). Maturity Model for Knowledge Management and Strategic Benefits. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. 2, p. 748). Academic Conferences International Limited. Ovallos-Gazabon, D. A., De-La-Hoz-Escorcia, S. M., & MaldonadoPerez, D. J. (2015). Creatividad, innovación y emprendimiento en la formación de ingenieros en Colombia. Un estudio prospectivo. Revista Educación en Ingeniería, 10(19), 90–104. Retrieved from http:// www.educacioneningenieria.org/index.php/edi/article/view/524 Patil, S. K., & Kant, R. (2014). Methodological literature review of knowledge management research. Tékhne, 12(1), 3–14. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers. Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge. Wei Chong, C., Yen Yuen, Y., & Chew Gan, G. (2014). Knowledge sharing of academic staff: A comparison between private and public universities in Malaysia. Library Review, 63(3), 203–223.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Relation Analysis of Knowledge ...
Tamaño:
73.55Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3154]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem