Show simple item record

dc.creatorCardenas Escorcia, Yulineth del Carmen
dc.creatorValencia Ochoa, Guillermo Eliecer
dc.creatorAlbis Arrieta, Alberto Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T19:12:19Z
dc.date.available2018-11-20T19:12:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.isbn978-889560862-4
dc.identifier.issn22839216
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11323/1464
dc.description.abstractA complete mapping of the research output of syngas from biomass gasification was developed using the citation data from 2007 to 2017, with the help of Web of Science (WoS) and HistCite, which is a software oriented to determinate the yearly research output, the ranking of countries and institutions according to the total location citation score (TLCS), and the list of journals and articles with the highest mean citations in the field. Results show the significant increase in the number of documents published on gasification for syngas production from biomass, during the studied 11-year period. The country and institution with the highest research output are the Republic of China and the University of Maryland, respectively. The more significant number of articles and the highest TLCS values came from developed countries such as China, USA and Italy, which have more research advantages in this field than developing countries. The top three outputs journals were International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Fuel, and Applied Energy, being the same top three cited references. Articles published with higher TLCS values had a higher impact in the area of gasification to Syngas Production and played a relevant part in developing research trends in this topic.spa
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherItalian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDICeng
dc.rightsAtribución – No comercial – Compartir igualeng
dc.subjectDeveloping countrieseng
dc.subjectMappingeng
dc.subjectSynthesis gaseng
dc.titleMapping the research on gasification to syngas production using scientometry analysis from 2007 to 2017eng
dc.typeArticleeng
dcterms.referencesHajduk, S. (2017) ‘Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on City Logistics in International Scientific Literature’, Procedia Engineering. The Author(s), 182, pp. 282–290. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.194. Hood, W. W. and Wilson, C. S. (2001) ‘The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics’, Scientometrics, 52(2), pp. 291–314. doi: 10.1023/A:1017919924342. Juliani, F. and de Oliveira, O. J. (2016) ‘State of research on public service management: Identifying scientific gaps from a bibliometric study’, International Journal of Information Management. Elsevier Ltd, 36(6), pp. 1033–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.003. Laengle, S. et al. (2017) ‘Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview’, European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), pp. 803–816. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.027. Manotas, A. C., Obregon Quiñones, L. G. and Ochoa, G. V. (2017) ‘A Bibliometric Investigation of Wind Turbine’, Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 10(34). doi: 10.12988/ces.2017.711172. Martin-Martin, A. et al. (2016) The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter, EC3 Working Papers. doi: http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4814.4402. Robert, C. et al. (2017) ‘Evolution of the scientific literature on drug delivery: A 1974–2015 bibliometric study’, Journal of Controlled Release. Elsevier B.V, 260, pp. 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.012. Robinson-Garcia, N. et al. (2017) ‘DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations’, Journal of Informetrics. Elsevier Ltd, 11(3), pp. 841–854. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.07.003. Safer, K., Ouadha, A. and Tabet, F. (2017) ‘Entropy generation in turbulent syngas counter-flow diffusion flames’, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. Pergamon, 42(49), pp. 29532–29544. doi: 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2017.08.217. 185 Sarmiento Nieto, I., Escorcia, Y. C. and Ochoa, G. V. (2017) ‘Análisis cienciométrico de la investigación de sistemas fotovoltaicos integrados a edificios desde el año 2000 a 2017 A scientometric analysis of the investigation of building integrated photovoltaic thermal (BIPVT) systems from 2000 to 2017’, Año, 38. Available at: http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n47/a17v38n47p29.pdf (Accessed: 2 January 2018). Sempéré, J. (2017) ‘L’identité institutionnelle au sein des outils bibliométriques : un enjeu stratégique’, Ethics, Medicine and Public Health. Elsevier Masson SAS. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2017.09.014. Sengupta, I. N. (1992) ‘Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: An overview’, Libri, 42(2), pp. 75–98. doi: 10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.75. Siluo, Y. and Qingli, Y. (2017) ‘Are Scientometrics , Informetrics , and Bibliometrics different ?’, (August), p. 12. Stand, L. M., Chamorro, M. V. and Ochoa, G. V. (2017) ‘Solar Energy Research: A Scientometric Study in the Period 1956-2015’, Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 10(19). doi: 10.12988/ces.2017.7887. Waltman, L. (2016) ‘A review of the literature on citation impact indicators’, Journal of Informetrics. Elsevier Ltd, 10(2), pp. 365–391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007. Yao, Z. et al. (2018) ‘Biomass gasification for syngas and biochar co-production: Energy application and economic evaluation’, Applied Energy. Elsevier, 209, pp. 43–55. doi: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2017.10.077. Zhang, C.-C. et al. (2017) ‘A bibliometric study of the Journal of School Health : 1965–2014’, Chinese Nursing Research. Elsevier Ltd, 4(2), pp. 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cnre.2017.03.011. Zhang, Y. et al. (2017) ‘Detecting and predicting the topic change of Knowledge-based Systems: A topicbased bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2016’, Knowledge-Based Systems. Elsevier B.V., 133, pp. 255– 268. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.07.011. Zheng, X. et al. (2017) ‘Bibliometrics study on the Journal of American College Health ’:, Chinese Nursing Research. Elsevier Ltd, 4(3), pp. 133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.004. Zhong, S. et al. (2016) ‘A bibliometric review on natural resource accounting during 1995–2014’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 139, pp. 122–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.039.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record