Show simple item record

dc.creatorTorres Samuel, Maritza
dc.creatorVásquez, Carmen
dc.creatorViloria Silva, Amelec Jesus
dc.creatorVarela Izquierdo, Noel
dc.creatorHernández Fernández, Lissette
dc.creatorPortillo Medina, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T14:52:48Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T14:52:48Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0302-9743
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11323/1843
dc.description.abstractThe internationalization and positioning of universities offers relative comparisons, studied according to different teaching and research criteria. Among the recognized rankings are the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) or Ranking of Shanghai, QS World University Ranking, SCimago Institutions Rankings SIR and the Web Ranking of Universities-Webometrics. Comparatively, characteristics of each one are presented in terms of scope, volume of universities positioned and evaluation criteria. The indicators associated with research and institutional capacity stand out as common criteria in the revised evaluation methodologies. Regarding Latin America, Brazil leads with its presence in the four rankings. There is a greater number of Latin American universities in QS (40%) and Webometrics (31%), in the other two rankings it does not exceed 8%.es_CO
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLecture Notes in Computer Scienceen_US
dc.rightsAtribución – No comercial – Compartir igualen_US
dc.subjectQSen_US
dc.subjectRanking universityen_US
dc.subjectSCimagoen_US
dc.subjectShanghaien_US
dc.subjectWebometricsen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of patterns in the university world rankings webometrics, Shanghai, QS and SIR-SCimago: case Latin Americaen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record