Evaluación de impactos vs. subsidios en Innovación y Desarrollo en la empresa privada
Date
2013-01-01
2013-01-01
Metadata
Show full item record
Show full item record
Compartir:
Citar con el siguiente link: http://hdl.handle.net/11323/2577
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/economicascuc/article/view/575
Citar con el siguiente link: http://hdl.handle.net/11323/2577
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/economicascuc/article/view/575
Abstract
Este trabajo tiene como propósito analizar los efectos que sobre la Innovación y Desarrollo (I+D) en las empresas tiene la financiación estatal. Para tal efecto se desagrega el apoyo o subsidio estatal a nivel central y regional, considerando en este último los resultados sobre empresas innovadoras (gasto en I+D positivo) en tres comunidades autónomas (CCAA)4 de España: Madrid, Cataluña y País Vasco. A partir de la base de datos de la Encuesta Sobre Estrategias Empresariales (ESEE) para el periodo 1998-2005 y utilizando como metodología una técnica no paramétrica conocida como Propensity Score Matching (PSM)5, se procede a estimar el efecto de la política pública sobre Innovación y Desarrollo en las empresas en condiciones no experimentales (no aleatorias). Los resultados evidencian situaciones complementarias; es decir, recibir un subsidio regional influye positivamente en la recepción de un subsidio central y viceversa, por lo que, a priori, la actuación de las agencias públicas se revela como una actuación complementaria, hecho que conduce a señalar que la intervención simultánea de distintos agentes de gobierno en la promoción de la Innovación y Desarrollo, genera nuevos escenarios en la evaluación del impacto que produce este tipo de políticas
Referencias:
Abadie et al. (2004). Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(3), pp. 290-311 50 Sergio Moisés Afcha Chávez y Guillén Eduardo León López Buesa, M., Martínez, M., Heis, J. & Baumert, T. (2002). Los sistemas regionales de innovación en España. Tipología basada en indicadores económicos e institucionales de las Comunidades Autónomas. Economía industrial, No. 347, 2002. Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M. & Georghiou, L. (1995). What Difference Does It Make - Additionality in The Public Support Of R&D In Large Firms. International Journal of Technology Management. Busom, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9, 111- 148. Busom I. & Fernández-Ribas, A. (2007). Do R&D Programs of Different Government Levels Overlap in the European Union?. Papeles de trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Serie economía. pp. 1-31. Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. (2005). Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin. Cassiman, B. & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium, American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. Castells, M. & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world. Routledge, Londres (Traducción española: Tecnópolis del mundo. Formación de los complejos industriales del siglo XXI. Alianza, Madrid, 1994). Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally. Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. (1992). Regional Innovation Centres in Europe: The Experience of the Basque Country, Emilia-Romagna and Wales. Regional Industrial Research, Cardiff (United Kingdom). Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction. The origins of the concept. In: Regional Innovation Systems, H.-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich (Editors) (University College London Press, London, Bristol PA) pp. 2-25. Cooke, P. y Memedovic, O. (2003). Strategies for Regional Innovation Systems: Learning Transfer and Applications. Policy Papers, UNIDO, Vienna. Czarnitzki, D. & Fier, A. (2002). Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment: evidence from the German service sector. Applied Economics Quarterly 48 (1), 1-25. David, P., Hall, B. & Toole, A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29, 497-529. Duguet, E. (2004). Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D. Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data. Revue d’Economie Politique, vol. 114, 263-292. Feldman, M. & Audretsch, D. (1999). Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43: 409-429. Fritsch, M. & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D?, Research Policy, 30, 297- 312. Fritsch, M. & Stephan, A. (2005). Regionalization of innovation policy--Introduction to the special issue, Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pp. 1123-1127, October. Fritsch, M. & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33, 245–255. García-Quevedo, J. (2004). Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta analy- 51 Evaluación de impactos vs. subsidios en innovación y desarrollo en la empresa privada sis of the econometric evidence, Kyklos, 57, 87-102. Görg, H., Hanley, A. & Strobl, E. (2007). Productivity Effects of International Outsourcing: Evidence from Plant Level Data, CEPR Discussion Papers 6361, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. González, X. & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D activities?, Research Policy, 37(3), pp. 371-389. Hall, Bronwyn H. (1993). R&D Tax Policy During the 1980s: Success or Failure? Tax Policy and The Economy, Vol 7, pp 1-36. Hall, B. & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29, 449-469. Heijs, J. & Herrera, L. (2007). Difusión y adicionalidad de las ayudas públicas a la innovación. Revista de Economía Aplicada, XV (44), 177-197. Herrera, L. & Nieto, M. (2008). The national innovation policy effect according to firm location. Technovation (2008), doi:10.1016/ j.technovation.2008.02.009. Hussler, C. & Ronde, P. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does really matter?, Research Policy, 34, 8, 1150-1172. Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79, 957-970. Klette, T. J., Moen, J. & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy 29, 471-495. Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 4, 369-390. OECD (2006). Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour. Measuring Behavioural additionality. González, X., Jaumandreu, J. & Pazó, C. (2005). Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness.The Rand Journal of Economics 36, No. 4, 930-950. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 77-90. Sakakibara, M. (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives, Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 143-164. Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untreated interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies 2, 191-221. Tödtling, F. & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation systems in regions of Europe—a comparative perspective. European Planning Studies 7, 699-717. Tödtling, F. & Kaufmann, A. (2001). European Urban and Regional Studies, 8, 3, 203-215. Veugelers, R. & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities, some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 355-379
Abadie et al. (2004). Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(3), pp. 290-311 50 Sergio Moisés Afcha Chávez y Guillén Eduardo León López Buesa, M., Martínez, M., Heis, J. & Baumert, T. (2002). Los sistemas regionales de innovación en España. Tipología basada en indicadores económicos e institucionales de las Comunidades Autónomas. Economía industrial, No. 347, 2002. Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M. & Georghiou, L. (1995). What Difference Does It Make - Additionality in The Public Support Of R&D In Large Firms. International Journal of Technology Management. Busom, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9, 111- 148. Busom I. & Fernández-Ribas, A. (2007). Do R&D Programs of Different Government Levels Overlap in the European Union?. Papeles de trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Serie economía. pp. 1-31. Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. (2005). Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin. Cassiman, B. & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium, American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. Castells, M. & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world. Routledge, Londres (Traducción española: Tecnópolis del mundo. Formación de los complejos industriales del siglo XXI. Alianza, Madrid, 1994). Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally. Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. (1992). Regional Innovation Centres in Europe: The Experience of the Basque Country, Emilia-Romagna and Wales. Regional Industrial Research, Cardiff (United Kingdom). Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction. The origins of the concept. In: Regional Innovation Systems, H.-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich (Editors) (University College London Press, London, Bristol PA) pp. 2-25. Cooke, P. y Memedovic, O. (2003). Strategies for Regional Innovation Systems: Learning Transfer and Applications. Policy Papers, UNIDO, Vienna. Czarnitzki, D. & Fier, A. (2002). Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment: evidence from the German service sector. Applied Economics Quarterly 48 (1), 1-25. David, P., Hall, B. & Toole, A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29, 497-529. Duguet, E. (2004). Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D. Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data. Revue d’Economie Politique, vol. 114, 263-292. Feldman, M. & Audretsch, D. (1999). Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43: 409-429. Fritsch, M. & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D?, Research Policy, 30, 297- 312. Fritsch, M. & Stephan, A. (2005). Regionalization of innovation policy--Introduction to the special issue, Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pp. 1123-1127, October. Fritsch, M. & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33, 245–255. García-Quevedo, J. (2004). Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta analy- 51 Evaluación de impactos vs. subsidios en innovación y desarrollo en la empresa privada sis of the econometric evidence, Kyklos, 57, 87-102. Görg, H., Hanley, A. & Strobl, E. (2007). Productivity Effects of International Outsourcing: Evidence from Plant Level Data, CEPR Discussion Papers 6361, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. González, X. & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D activities?, Research Policy, 37(3), pp. 371-389. Hall, Bronwyn H. (1993). R&D Tax Policy During the 1980s: Success or Failure? Tax Policy and The Economy, Vol 7, pp 1-36. Hall, B. & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29, 449-469. Heijs, J. & Herrera, L. (2007). Difusión y adicionalidad de las ayudas públicas a la innovación. Revista de Economía Aplicada, XV (44), 177-197. Herrera, L. & Nieto, M. (2008). The national innovation policy effect according to firm location. Technovation (2008), doi:10.1016/ j.technovation.2008.02.009. Hussler, C. & Ronde, P. (2005). Innovation in regions: What does really matter?, Research Policy, 34, 8, 1150-1172. Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79, 957-970. Klette, T. J., Moen, J. & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy 29, 471-495. Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 4, 369-390. OECD (2006). Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour. Measuring Behavioural additionality. González, X., Jaumandreu, J. & Pazó, C. (2005). Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness.The Rand Journal of Economics 36, No. 4, 930-950. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 77-90. Sakakibara, M. (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: An empirical examination of motives, Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 143-164. Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untreated interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies 2, 191-221. Tödtling, F. & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation systems in regions of Europe—a comparative perspective. European Planning Studies 7, 699-717. Tödtling, F. & Kaufmann, A. (2001). European Urban and Regional Studies, 8, 3, 203-215. Veugelers, R. & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities, some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 355-379
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11323/2577
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/economicascuc/article/view/575
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/economicascuc/article/view/575
Collections