La ciudad no es un reloj: consideraciones sobre la muerte de la planificación y el propósito de lo 99% invisible
The city is not a clock. Considerations about the death of planning and purpose of the invisible 99%
Date
2013-07-01
2013-07-01
Metadata
Show full item record
Show full item record
Compartir:
Citar con el siguiente link: http://hdl.handle.net/11323/2649
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/moduloarquitecturacuc/article/view/38
Citar con el siguiente link: http://hdl.handle.net/11323/2649
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/moduloarquitecturacuc/article/view/38
Abstract
Este artículo argumenta en contra del reduccionismo pseudocientífico propuesto por la planificación urbana contemporánea. Establece los parámetros para una nueva práctica de diseño urbano, y plantea un método de intervención similar a las tácticas de abajo hacia arriba propuestas por los artistas conceptuales y por los geógrafos de espacio y lugar.
Referencias:
Amoss, M. (2007). Challenging the Commons: a yearlong experiment tests a new breed of urban public space in San Francisco. The Next American City, 16 (Fall), 11-12. Da Empoli, G. (2013). Contro gli specialisti: la rivincita dell’umanesimo. Venezia: Marsilio Editori. Debord, G. (1969). The society of the spectacle. Sussex: Soul Bay Press, Ltd. Highmore, B. (2002). Everyday life and cultural theory. New York: Routledge. Hubbard, P. A. (2011). Introduction. In P. A. Hubbard, Key thinkers on space and place (pp. 1-17). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Knabb, K. (2006). Situationist International anthology. Berkeley, California: Bureau of Public Secrets. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell. Merker, B. (2010). Rebar’s absurd tactics in generous urbanism. In J. Hou, Insurgent Public Space: guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities (p. 46). New York: Routledge. Taylor, F. (2011). Principles of scientific management. CreateSpace Independent Publishin Platform. Weinberger, D. (2012). Too big to know: rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren’t the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room. New York: Basic Books.
Amoss, M. (2007). Challenging the Commons: a yearlong experiment tests a new breed of urban public space in San Francisco. The Next American City, 16 (Fall), 11-12. Da Empoli, G. (2013). Contro gli specialisti: la rivincita dell’umanesimo. Venezia: Marsilio Editori. Debord, G. (1969). The society of the spectacle. Sussex: Soul Bay Press, Ltd. Highmore, B. (2002). Everyday life and cultural theory. New York: Routledge. Hubbard, P. A. (2011). Introduction. In P. A. Hubbard, Key thinkers on space and place (pp. 1-17). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Knabb, K. (2006). Situationist International anthology. Berkeley, California: Bureau of Public Secrets. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell. Merker, B. (2010). Rebar’s absurd tactics in generous urbanism. In J. Hou, Insurgent Public Space: guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities (p. 46). New York: Routledge. Taylor, F. (2011). Principles of scientific management. CreateSpace Independent Publishin Platform. Weinberger, D. (2012). Too big to know: rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren’t the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room. New York: Basic Books.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11323/2649
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/moduloarquitecturacuc/article/view/38
https://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/moduloarquitecturacuc/article/view/38
Collections