Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authoralbors-garrigos, josespa
dc.contributor.authorHERVAS-OLIVER, JOSE LUISspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-17T15:52:06Z
dc.date.available2020-01-17T15:52:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-14
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11323/5852spa
dc.description.abstractAcademic literature has often emphasized how firms in regional clusters exploit both place-specific local resources and external, world-class knowledge to strengthen their competitiveness by expanding the influence of regional systems of innovation. Innovation based on more complex and disruptive technologies tends to also be based on more open systems that utilize the clusters’ external networks. However, most of the literature has associated clusters with incremental innovation. This paper will analyze the determinants of disruptive innovation development in traditional (low and medium tech) clusters caused by high-tech entrepreneurs. It will analyze the case of the development of breakthrough innovation, its diffusion in the Spanish ceramic tile cluster, and its consequent diffusion in the industry worldwide. It will examine how market demands, customer orientation, technology diffusion from other industries, industry competitiveness, as well as internal and external networking of clusters can facilitate the development of complex technology within a common set of social capital goals, cognitive schemes, and knowledge. The paper is based on a case study and field work carried out over10 years in the field in the Italian and Spanish tile ceramic clusters. The main contribution of this paper to technology strategy theory will be thorough the utilization of the disruptive technology paradigm in explaining industry changes and sustainability.spa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherApplied Sciencesspa
dc.relation.ispartofhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app9245513spa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/spa
dc.subjectTile ceramic clustersspa
dc.subjectLow and medium tech clustersspa
dc.subjectRadical innovationspa
dc.subjectDisruptive technologyspa
dc.titleDisruptive innovation in traditional clusters: the case of the kerajet ceramic tile cluster in Spainspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.references1. Asheim, B.T.; Coenen, L. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Res. Policy 2005, 34, 1173–1190. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references2. Asheim, B.T.; Smith, H.L.; Oughton, C. Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Reg. Stud. 2011, 45, 875–891. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references3. Asheim, B.T.; Isaksen, A.; Martin, R.; Trippl, M. The role of clusters and public policy in new regional economic path development. In The Life Cycle of Clusters; Forhnal, D., Hassink, R., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: London, UK, 2017; pp. 13–34.spa
dc.relation.references4. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Albors-Garrigos, J. Resources and Innovation in Low-tech Industries: An Empirical Study of Clusters in Spain and Italy; Paul, L., Robertson, P.L., Jacobson, D., Eds.; Edwar Elgar Publishers: London, UK, 2011; pp. 12–145.spa
dc.relation.references5. Lissoni, F. Knowledge codification and the geography of innovation: The case of Brescia mechanical cluster. Res. Policy 2001, 30, 1479–1500. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references6. Belussi, F.; Sedita, S.R. Industrial districts as open learning systems: Combining emergent and deliberate knowledge structures. Reg. Stud. 2012, 46, 165–184. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references7. Asheim, B.T.; Gertler, M.S. Regional innovation systems and the geographical foundations of innovation. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation; Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 291–317. 85.spa
dc.relation.references8. Steinle, C.; Schiele, C. When do industries cluster? A proposal on how to assess an industry’s propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation. Res. Policy 2002, 31, 849–858. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references9. Giulani, E. The wine industry: Persistence of tacit knowledge or increased codification? Some implications for catching-up countries. Int. J. Technol. Glob. 2007, 3, 138–154. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references10. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Albors-Garrigos, J. The role of the firm’s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: When distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation. J. Econ. Geogr. 2009, 9, 263–283. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references11. Grashof, N.; Hesse, K.; Fornahl, D. Radical or not? The role of clusters in the emergence of radical innovations. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 27, 1904–1923. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references12. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed.; Sage: New York, NY, USA, 2009.spa
dc.relation.references13. Dube, L.; Pare, G. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. Mis Quaterly 2003, 27, 597–635. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references14. Creswell, J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2013.spa
dc.relation.references15. Molina-Morales, F.X. Industrial districts and innovation: The case of the Spanish ceramic tiles industry. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2002, 14, 317–335. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references16. ASCER. Estudio Económico del Sector del Azulejo 2018, Castellón (Spanish). Available online: http//www. ascer.es (accessed on 19 September 2019).spa
dc.relation.references17. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Albors-Garrigos, J. Do the cluster’s resources and capabilities matter? An application of resource-based view in clusters. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2007, 19, 113–136. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references18. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Albors-Garrigos, J.; Dalmau, J.I. Externalties and the reduction of knowledge asymmetries among clusters within global value chains: The case of the ceramic tile district of Castellon. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2008, 16, 507–520. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references19. ASSOPIASTRELLE. Assopiastrelle and Asia Observatore, Corporate Information. 2019. Available online: www.assopiastrelle.it (accessed on 10 October 2019).spa
dc.relation.references20. Albors, J. Networking and technology transfer in the Spanish ceramic tiles cluster: Its role in the sector competitiveness. J. Technol. Transf. 2002, 27, 263–273. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references21. Nelson, R.; Winter, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, 5th ed.; The Belknap Press of Harvard University: London, UK, 2013.spa
dc.relation.references22. Belussi, F.; Rita Sedita, S. The symbiotic division of labour between heterogeneous districts in the Dutch and Italian horticultural industry. Urban Stud. 2008, 45, 2715–2734. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references23. Breschi, S.; Malerba, F.; Orsenigo, L. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Econ. J. 2000, 110, 388–410. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references24. Meyer-Stamer, J.; Maggi, C.; Seibel, S. Upgrading in the tile industry of Italy, Spain and Brazil. In Local Enterprises in the Global Economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading; Schmitz, H., Ed.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2004; pp. 210–235.spa
dc.relation.references25. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Davide, M. The case of the European ceramic tile districts in Spain and Italy. In Local Clusters in Global Value Chains: Linking Actors and Territories Through Manufacturing and Innovation; DeMarchi, V., DiMaria, E., Gereffi, G., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 135–147.spa
dc.relation.references26. Iammarino, S.; McCann, P. The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Res. Policy 2006, 35, 1018–1036. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references27. Robertson, P.; Patel, P. New wine in old bottles: Echnological diffusion in developed economies. Res. Policy 2007, 36, 708–721. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references28. Baraldi, L. Italia e Spagna: Un duopolio europeo nelle piastrelle ceramiche. Ceram. World Rev. 2019, 131, 48–51.spa
dc.relation.references29. St. John, S.H.; Pouder, R.W. Technology clusters versus industry clusters: Resources, networks, and regional advantages. Growth Chang. 2006, 37, 141–171. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references30. Mytelka, L.; Farinelli, F. Local Clusters, Innovation Systems and Sustained Competitiveness; Discussion Papers No. 5; United Nations University: New York, NY, USA, 2000.spa
dc.relation.references31. Powell, W.W.; Grodal, S. Networks of innovators. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation; Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 56––85.spa
dc.relation.references32. Beckman, C.M.; Haunschild, P.R. Networklearning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience. Adm. Sci. Q. 2002, 47, 92–124. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references33. Abernathy, W.J.; Utterback, J. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol. Rev. 1978, 80, 40–47.spa
dc.relation.references34. Abernathy, W.J.; Clark, K.B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy 1985, 14, 3–22. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references35. Ettlie, I.F.; Bridges, W.P.; O’Keefe, R. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical vs. incremental Innovation. Manag. Sci. 1984, 6, 682–695. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references36. Tushman, M.L.; Anderson, P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm. Sci. Q. 1986, 31, 439–465. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references37. Freeman, C.; Soete, L. Economics of Industrial Innovation, 5th ed.; Mass MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013.spa
dc.relation.references38. Dewar, R.D.; Dutton, J.E. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Manag. Sci. 1986, 32, 1422–1433. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references39. Urabe, K. Innovation and the Japanese management system. In Innovation and Management: International Comparisons; Urabe, K., Child, J., Kagono, T., Eds.; Walterde Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1988.spa
dc.relation.references40. Dalum, B.; Pedersen, C.R.; Villumsen, G. Technological Life Cycles: Regional Clusters Facing Disruption; DRUID Working Paper No. 02-10; Druid: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002.spa
dc.relation.references41. Green, S.G.; Gavin, M.B.; Aiman-Smith, L. Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. Eng. Manag. IEEE 1995, 42, 203–214. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references42. Bower, J.L.; Christensen, C.M. Disruptive Technologies: Catching the wave. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1995, 73, 43–53.spa
dc.relation.references43. Coccia, M. Radical innovations as drivers of breakthroughs: Characteristics and properties of the management of technology leading to superior organisational performance in the discovery process of R&D labs. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2016, 28, 381–395.spa
dc.relation.references44. Adner, R. When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strateg. Manag. J. 2002, 23, 667–688. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references45. Adner, R.; Kapoor, R. Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strateg. Manag. J. 2016, 37, 625–648. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references46. Christensen, C.M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, 5th ed.; Harvard Business Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013.spa
dc.relation.references47. Danneels, E. Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2004, 21, 246–258. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references48. Markides, C. Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2006, 23, 19–25. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references49. Tellis, G.J. Disruptive technology or visionary leadership? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2006, 23, 34–38. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references50. Von Hippel, E. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Manag. Sci. 1986, 32, 791–805. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references51. Chesbrough, H. Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 354–363. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references52. Schmidt, G.M.; Druehl, C.T. When is a Disruptive Innovation Disruptive? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2008, 25, 347–369. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references53. Isaksen, A. From success to failure, the disappearance of clusters: A study of a Norwegian boat-building cluster. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2018, 11, 241–255. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references54. Glasmeier, A. Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Res. Policy 1991, 20, 469–485. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references55. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Albors-Garrigos, J. Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster lifecycles. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2014, 26, 431–452. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references56. Hervas-Oliver, J.L.; Sempere-Ripoll, F.; Estelles-Miguel, S.; Rojas-Alvarado, R. Radical vs incremental innovation in Marshallian Industrial Districts in the Valencian Region: What prevails? Eur. Plan. Stud. 2019, 27, 1924–1939. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references57. Albors, J.; Hervas-Oliver, J.L. The European tile ceramic industry in the XXI century. Challenges of the present decade. Biol. Soc. Esp. Ceram. 2006, 45, 13–21. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references58. Russo, M. Innovation Dynamics and Industrial Dynamics in A Local Production System; Working Paper 205; Universita di Modena: Modena, Italy, 2000.spa
dc.relation.references59. Forcada, E. El mercado de la decoración digital ceramica. Técnica Cerámica 2012, 349, 1307–1322.spa
dc.relation.references60. Forcada, E. Durst inicia en castellon su nuevo equipo. Técnica Cerámica 2012, 394, 497–498.spa
dc.relation.references61. Utterback, J.M.; Abernathy, W.J. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 1975, 3, 639–656. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references62. Giacomini, P. A Digital future. Ceram. World Rev. 2010, 86, 210–220.spa
dc.relation.references63. Ferrari, A. Digital printing technology. Ceram. World Rev. 2016, 115, 106–107.spa
dc.relation.references64. Assink, M. Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European. J. Innov. Manag. 2006, 2, 215–233. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references65. Munari, F.; Sobrero,M.; Malipiero, A. Absorptive capacity and localized spillovers: Focal firms as technological gatekeepers in industrial districts. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2011, 22, 1–34. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references66. Landry, R.; Amara, N.; Lamari, M. Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2002, 69, 681–701. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references67. Angel, D.P. Inter-firm collaboration and technology development partnerships within US manufacturing industries. Reg. Stud. 2002, 36, 333–344. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references68. Ouimet, M.; Landry, R.; Amara, N. Network positions and radical innovation: A social network analysis of the Quebec optics and photonics. In Proceedings of the DRUID Conference on Industrial Dynamics, Innovation and Development, Elsinore, Denmark, 14–16 June 2004.spa
dc.relation.references69. Reid, N.; Carroll, M.C. The dynamics of cluster formation in accelerated radical innovation: Bridging the inception to implementation gap. In Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, Portland, OR, USA, 5–9 August 2007.spa
dc.relation.references70. Noteboom, B. Inter-Firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An Integrated Approach; Routledge: London, UK, 2004.spa
dc.relation.references71. Chorafakis, G.; Laget, P. Mesoeconomic structure, Innovation and Complexity: The concept of Mesoeconomic Plexus. In Knowledge Matters; Carayannis, E., Formica, P., Eds.; Palgrave Mc Millan: Basingstoke, UK, 2008; pp. 52–86.spa
dc.relation.references72. Tallman, S.; Jenkins, M.; Henry, N.; Pinch, S. Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2004, 29, 258–271. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references73. Cohen, W.; Levinthal, D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1990, 35, 128–152. [CrossRef]spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3154]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC0 1.0 Universal
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC0 1.0 Universal