Show simple item record


dc.creatorAndreevich Pisenko, Kirill
dc.creatorLvovich Botvinnik, Stanislav
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-28T18:30:41Z
dc.date.available2020-08-28T18:30:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-02
dc.identifier.citationPisenko, K., & Botvinnik, S. (2020). Protección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. JURÍDICAS CUC, 16(1), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10spa
dc.identifier.issn2389-7716
dc.identifier.issn1692-3030
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/7037
dc.description.abstractLegal issues of counteracting the imposition of unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party raise a number of theoretical and practical problems. The authors of the article try to determine the legal nature of imposition and develop methods of comprehensive counteraction to this violation in order to ensure the balance of convenience. From the philosophical perspective and a certain world- view, the study is based on the balance of convenience regarded as the objective foundation of legal regulation. The main philosophical and scientific methods used in this article include the dialectic method, the formal-legal method, the method of legal hermeneutics, as well as the comparative-legal and empirical methods. The theoretical basis is represented by scientific works in the field of civil, administrative, entrepreneurial and procedural branches of law. The legal nature of imposition as a type of violation should be determined with due regard to the general logic of antitrust regulation. The parallel use of both public and private law necessitates the development of procedural legal means ensuring uniform law enforcement and the balance of convenience. First of all, the unity of approaches regarding legal tools of public and civil law should be concerned with the definition of features and the essence of elements compiling the imposition itself. The authors also propose approaches to the formation of an appropriate procedural model.spa
dc.description.abstractLos problemas legales de contrarrestar la imposición de términos desfavorables del contrato por dominante forman un complejo de problemas teóricos y prácticos. Los autores de este artículo intentan determinar la naturaleza legal de la “imposición”, así como desarrollar enfoques para resolver los problemas de la resistencia integral a esta violación para garantizar un equilibrio de intereses. La base filosófica y concepcional es, en primer lugar, la idea de un equilibrio de intereses, como la base objetiva de la regulación legal. Entre los principales métodos filosóficos y científicos utilizados en el trabajo, en particular, son dialéctico, legal formal, hermenéutica legal, legal comparado, empírico. La base teórica es el trabajo en el derecho civil, administrativo, empresarial y procesal. La naturaleza legal de la imposición como la violación debe determinarse por la lógica general de la regulación antimonopolio. La posibilidad del uso paralelo de los recursos de derecho público y privado requiere el desarrollo de medios legales procesales para garantizar una práctica uniforme de aplicación de la ley, un equilibrio de intereses. En primer lugar, la unidad de los enfoques en el marco del derecho público y los recursos del derecho civil deben relacionarse con la determinación de los signos y el contenido de los elementos de la imposición. También se proponen los enfoques para la formación de un modelo procesal apropiado.spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.sourceJURÍDICAS CUCspa
dc.subjectAgreementspa
dc.subjectAntitrust lawspa
dc.subjectBalance of conveniencespa
dc.subjectImpositionspa
dc.subjectPublic lawspa
dc.subjectTortspa
dc.subjectAcuerdospa
dc.subjectDerecho antimonopoliospa
dc.subjectEquilibrio de interesesspa
dc.subjectImposiciónspa
dc.subjectDerecho públicospa
dc.subjectPleitospa
dc.titleProtection against imposing unfavorable contract terms by the dominant party in the russian legislation: issues of ensuring the balance of conveniencespa
dc.title.alternativeProtección contra la imposición de cláusulas abusivas por parte de la posición dominante en la legislación rusa: aspectos para garantizar un equilibrio de interesesspa
dc.typearticlespa
dcterms.referencesBashlakov-Nikolaev, I. V. (2013). Civil liability in the sphere of competition protection. The system of private prosecutions and classaction lawsuits. Russian Law: experience, analysis, practice, 7, 75–82. Available from http://bukvoved.ru/ anno/arhiv-2013.htmlspa
dcterms.referencesDrozdova, T. Yu. (2005). Fairness in the Russian civil law. [Thesis degree]. Baikal State University, Irkutsk. Available from http://www.dslib.net/civil-pravo/dobrosovestnost-v-rossijs- kom-grazhdanskom-prave.htmlspa
dcterms.referencesEgorova, M. A. (2018). The abuse of one’s dominant position as a common form of right abuse. Lex russica, 4(137), 70–80. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zlou- potreblenie-dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-kak-chastnyy- sluchay-zloupotrebleniya-pravomspa
dcterms.referencesKuznetsova, O. A. (2006). Rules and principles of the Russian civil law. Moscow: Statut.spa
dcterms.referencesKvanina, V. V. (2014). Legal remedies used to protect personal rights and interests in antitrust law. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 6(1), 60–64. Available from http://base. garant.ru/57573552/spa
dcterms.referencesMikheeva, N. (2008). Fight against oppressive contracts. EJ Question-answer. Available from https://www.eg-online. ru/product/vo/year/2008/spa
dcterms.referencesPetrov, D. A. (2010). The imposition of contract terms as a form of abusing one’s dominant position. Yurist, 11(1), 32–38. Availbable from http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2010/ju- rist/11/spa
dcterms.referencesPopova, A. O. (2016). The abuse of one’s dominant position through imposing contract terms. National case law, 6(8). Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zloupotreblenie- dominiruyuschim-polozheniem-v-forme-navyazyvaniya-us- loviy-dogovora/viewerspa
dcterms.referencesPyankova, A. F. (2015). The balance of convenience as a principle of civil law. Legal Concept, 1(26), 123–128. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/balans-interesov-kak- printsip-grazhdanskogo-pravaspa
dcterms.referencesRF. FAS. (September 5, 2013). Application of the provisions of the Federal Law on the Basics of State Regulation of Trade Activities in the RF. [N AC/34872/13]. Available from https:// ppt.ru/docs/pismo/fas/n-ats-34872-13-34753spa
dcterms.referencesRF. FAS. (March 15, 2011). N A40-30589/10-134-224 [Resolution N KG-A40/502-11].spa
dcterms.referencesRF. Supreme Court. (June 23, 2015). Application of some provi- sions of the Section I of part one of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation by courts. [Resolution N 25]. Available from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_ LAW_181602/spa
dcterms.referencesRF. State Duma. (July 27, 2006). Protection of Competition. [Federal Law No. 135-FZ]. RU077. Available from https://www. wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru077en.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesRF. State Duma. (November 13, 1994). The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. [Part One N 51-FZ]. RU083. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/ru/ru083en.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesRF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (March 14, 2014). Freedom of contract and its limits. [Resolution N 16]. Newsletter of the Higher Arbitration Court, 5, 85–91. Available from http:// www.szrf.ru/szrf/doc.phtml?nb=107&issid=107201400500 0&docid=12spa
dcterms.referencesRF. Supreme Arbitration Court. (June 30, 2008). Issues caused by the application of antitrust law by courts. [Resolution N 30]. RU072. Available from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lex- docs/laws/en/ru/ru072en.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesRyzhenkov, A. Y. (2013). The principle of fairness in the new civil law. Gaps in Russian law. Law journal, (3), 68–71. Available from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-do- brosovestnosti-v-obnovlennom-grazhdanskom-zakonoda- telstvespa
dcterms.referencesVolkov, A. V. (2013). The correlation between the principle of fairness and inadmissible abuse of right in modern civil law. Legal Concept, 3(20), 44–50. Available from https://cyber- leninka.ru/article/n/sootnoshenie-printsipa-dobrosovest- nosti-i-printsipa-nedopustimosti-zloupotrebleniya-pravom- v-sovremennom-grazhdanskom-prave/viewerspa
dcterms.referencesYarmonova, E. N. (2019). Legal customs as the source of law. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2(2), 180–182. Available from http://intjournal.ru/wp-con- tent/uploads/2019/03/Mezhdunarodnyj-ZHurnal-2-2-1.pdfspa
dcterms.referencesZelentsov, A. B. and Yastrebov, O. A. (2017). Administrative and judicial proceedings. Moscow: RUDN.spa
dc.source.urlhttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/2789/2764spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.10


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Revistas Científicas
    Artículos de investigación publicados en revistas pertenecientes a la Editorial EDUCOSTA.

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal