Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAnatolyevna Kirillova, Elenaspa
dc.contributor.authorBlinkov, Olegspa
dc.contributor.authorЗульфугарзаде, Теймурspa
dc.contributor.authorVladimirovich Bocharov, Aleksandrspa
dc.contributor.authorYashevich Avdalyan, Arturspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-01T00:34:15Z
dc.date.available2020-09-01T00:34:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-17
dc.identifier.citationKirillova, E. Blinkov, O., Zulfugarzade, T., Bocharov, A. & Avdalyan, A. (2020). El estado legal de los tokens y su herencia. Jurídicas CUC, 16(1), 287–302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.12spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/7042spa
dc.description.abstractThis article considers the legal status of tokens, their specifics and distinctive features, as well as the possibility of inheriting this digital asset. The study aims at analyzing the legal nature and classification of tokens, as well as the specifics of their inheritance. While conducting this research, it has been used the methods of collecting and studying singularities, generalization, scientific abstrac- tion, cognition of objective laws, objectivity, specificity and pluralism. It has been concluded that a token is an entry in the transaction block registry (blockchain) or other distributed information systems, which certifies that the token owner is entitled to civil law protections and/or is a cryptocurrency. It has been proved that tokens by their legal nature are digital units of accounting in the participating interest shares of entrepreneurial projects and authorized capitals of any company, digital price analogues of uncertificated securities and other objects of civil law. It has been developed a classification of tokens and emphasized the need to create an electronic data warehouse that contains access codes for these digital assets. After the testator’s death, these codes can be given to the heir by testament or by law in case the testator did not draw up the corresponding testament during their life. These conclusions and suggestions will allow to legally qualify tokens and resolve inheritance issues in this area.eng
dc.description.abstractEste artículo analiza el estado legal de los tokens, sus características específicas y distintivas, así como la posibilidad de herencia de este activo digital. El objetivo del estudio es analizar la naturaleza legal y la clasificación de los tokens, así como las especialidades de herencia. En esta investigación, se han utilizado los métodos de recopilación y estudio de sin- gularidades, generalización, abstracción científica, cognición de leyes objetivas, objetividad, especificidad y pluralismo. En el estudio se ha concluido que el token es una entrada en el registro de bloques de transacciones (blockchain), otro sistema de información distribuida que verifica que el propietario del token tiene derechos sobre objetos de derechos civiles y (o) es una criptomoneda. Se ha demostrado que los tokens, por su naturaleza legal, son unidad del precio digital en las acciones de individuos en proyectos empresariales, así como en el capital autorizado de la empresa: un análogo del precio digital de valores no certificados; análogo del precio digital de otros objetos de derechos civiles. Se ha propuesto una clasificación de tokens y se ha argumentado la necesidad de crear un repositorio electrónico contenido códigos del acceso para activos digitales, después de la muerte del testador, estos códigos pueden presentarse a los herederos por testamento o ley, si el testador no ha hecho las disposiciones testamentarias correspondientes durante su vida. Estas conclusiones y sugerencias ayudarán a resolver en la práctica los problemas de calificación legal del token y resolver problemas de herencia en esta área.spa
dc.format.extent16 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJURÍDICAS CUC; Vol. 16, Núm. 1 (2020)spa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/spa
dc.sourceJURÍDICAS CUCspa
dc.titleThe legal status of tokens and their inheritancespa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.12spa
dc.source.urlhttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/juridicascuc/article/view/2880spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.17981/juridcuc.16.1.2020.12spa
dc.identifier.eissn2389-7716spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.pissn1692-3030spa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJURÍDICAS CUCspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJURÍDICAS CUCspa
dc.relation.referencesBollen, R. A. (2013). The Legal Status of Online Currencies: Are Bitcoins the Future? Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice. 1–38. Available from https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2285247spa
dc.relation.referencesBryans, D. (2014). Bitcoin and money laundering: mining for an effective solution. Indiana Law Journal, 89(1), 441–472. Available from https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/ vol89/iss1/13/spa
dc.relation.referencesCiaian, P. and Rajcaniova, M. (2018). Virtual relationships: short- and longterm evidence from BitCoin and altcoin markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 52(1), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.in- tfin.2017.11.001spa
dc.relation.referencesCorbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A. and Yarovaya, L. (2019). Cryp- tocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 62(C), 182– 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson, L. and Block, W. (2015). Bitcoin, the regression theo- rem, and the emergence of a new medium of exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 18(3), 311–338. Available from https://mises.org/library/bit- coin-regression-theorem-and-emergence-new-medium- exchangespa
dc.relation.referencesDe Graaf, T. J. (2019). From old to new: From internet to smart contracts and from people to smart contracts. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(5), 105322. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1887/80378spa
dc.relation.referencesGrinberg, R. (2011). Bitcoin: an innovative alternative digital currency. Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, 4(1), 159–208. Available from https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_science_technology_law_journal/vol4/ iss1/3/spa
dc.relation.referencesGürkaynak, G., Yılmaz, İ., Yeşilaltay, B. and Bengi, B. (2018). Intellectual property law and practice in the blockchain realm. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 847–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.027spa
dc.relation.referencesJanssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U. & Ira- ni, Z. (2020). A framework for analyzing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International Journal of Information Management, 50(1), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2019.08.012spa
dc.relation.referencesKirillova, E. A., Pavlyuk, A. V., Zulfugarzade, T. & Mikhailova, I. A. (2018). Bitcoin, lifecoin, namecoin: the legal nature of virtual currency. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.14505// jarle.v9.1(31).16spa
dc.relation.referencesKotlyarov, S. B. (2018). Correlation of the notions of "law" and "legal procedure". Law and Education, (2), 44–49. Available from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32382027spa
dc.relation.referencesLorne, F., Daram, S., Frantz, R., Kumar, N., Mohammed, A. and Muley, A. (2018). Blockchain Economics and Marketing. Journal of Computer and Communications, 6(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2018.612011spa
dc.relation.referencesLow, K. F. K. and Teo, E. (2018). Chapter 10: Legal Risks of Own- ing Cryptocurrencies. In, D. Lee & R. Deng (eds.), Hand- book of Blockchain, Digital Finance, and Inclusion, Vol. 1, (pp. 225–247). London: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-810441-5.00010-5spa
dc.relation.referencesMazzorana-Kremer, F. (2019). Blockchain-Based Equity and STOs: Towards a Liquid Market for SME Financing? Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(5), 1534–1552. https:// doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.95099spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKinney, R. E., Shao, L. P., Rosenlieb, D. C. and Shao, D. H. (2015). Chapter 8 - Counterfeiting in Cryptocurrency: An Emerging Problem. In, D. Lee (ed.), Handbook of Digital Currency, (pp. 173–187). San Diego: Elsevier. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802117-0.00008-4spa
dc.relation.referencesNofer, M., Gomber, P., Hinz, O. & Schiereck, D. (2017). Blockchain. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(3), 183– 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0467-3spa
dc.relation.referencesSavelyev, A. (2018). Some risks of tokenization and block- chainizaition of private law. Computer Law & Secu- rity Review, 34(4), 863–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clsr.2018.05.010spa
dc.relation.referencesShanaev, S., Sharma, S., Ghimire, B. and Shuraeva, A. (2020). Taming the blockchain beast? Regulatory implications for the cryptocurrency Market. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ribaf.2019.101080spa
dc.relation.referencesSullivan, C. (2018). Digital identity – From emergent legal concept to new reality. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.015spa
dc.relation.referencesVandezande, N. (2017). Virtual currencies under EU antimoney laundering law. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.011spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, Y., Liu, Q., Guan, B. and Sui, X. (2015). The New Open Economy Macroeconomics of Working Habits. Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.4236/ tel.2015.51017spa
dc.relation.referencesZachariadis, M., Hileman, G. and Scott, S. V. (2019). Governance and control in distributed ledgers: Understanding the chal-lenges facing blockchain technology in financial services. Information and Organization, 29(2), 105–117. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.03.001spa
dc.relation.referencesZharova, A. and Ian, L. (2018). An examination of the experience of cryptocurrency use in Russia. In search of better practice. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(6), 1300–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.09.004spa
dc.subject.proposalCriptomonedaspa
dc.subject.proposalEstado legalspa
dc.subject.proposalHerederospa
dc.subject.proposalTecnología de blockchainspa
dc.subject.proposalTecnología digitalspa
dc.subject.proposalTokeneng
dc.subject.proposalBlockchain technologyeng
dc.subject.proposalCryptocurrencyeng
dc.subject.proposalDigital technologieseng
dc.subject.proposalHeireng
dc.subject.proposalLegal statuseng
dc.title.translatedEl estado legal de los tokens y su herenciaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationendpage302spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage287spa
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume16spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalabbrevJurídicasspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Revistas Científicas [1682]
    Artículos de investigación publicados en revistas pertenecientes a la Editorial EDUCOSTA.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC0 1.0 Universal
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC0 1.0 Universal