Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCalvillo, Cristóbalspa
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Fuentes, María del Marspa
dc.contributor.authorParrón Carreño, Tesifónspa
dc.contributor.authorSierra, Juan Carlosspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T21:57:44Z
dc.date.available2020-11-04T21:57:44Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-12
dc.identifier.issn1135-3848spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/7218spa
dc.description.abstractAbstract Attachment includes two dimensions (anxiety by abandonment and avoidance of intimacy). For its evaluation, the validation of the brief version of the Experiences in Close Relationship (ECR-S) scale was carried out in adults with a same-sex partner. Construct validity, factorial invariance, differential item functioning, reliability of internal consistency and concurrent validity were examined. A sample of 815 homosexuals and 815 heterosexuals (half men and half women) were used, all of them in a couple relationship. The bifactorial structure of the ECR-S is confirmed, being invariant by sexual orientation and sex. Its two dimensions have an adequate internal consistency and their measurements show evidence of validity. The ECR-S constitutes an excellent tool for assessing attachment in homosexual adults with a samesex partner.spa
dc.description.abstractEl apego incluye dos dimensiones (ansiedad por abandono y evitación de la intimidad). Para su evaluación se llevó a cabo la validación de la versión breve de la escala Experiences in Close Relationship (ECR-S) en adultos con pareja del mismo sexo. Se examinó la validez de constructo, la invarianza factorial, el funcionamiento diferencia del ítem, la fiabilidad de consistencia interna y la validez concurrente. Se empleó una muestra de 815 homosexuales y 815 heterosexuales (mitad hombres y mitad mujeres), todos ellos en una relación de pareja. Se confirma la estructura bifactorial de la ECR-S, siendo invariante por orientación sexual y sexo. Sus dos dimensiones presentan una consistencia interna adecuada y sus medidas manifiestan evidencias de validez. La ECR-S constituye una excelente herramienta para evaluar el apego en adultos homosexuales con pareja del mismo sexo.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/spa
dc.sourceRevista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologicaspa
dc.subjectApegospa
dc.subjectParejas del mismo sexospa
dc.subjectAnsiedadspa
dc.subjectEvitaciónspa
dc.subjectPropiedades psicométricasspa
dc.subjectAttachmentspa
dc.subjectSame-sex relationshipspa
dc.subjectAnxietyspa
dc.subjectAvoidancespa
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesspa
dc.titleValidación de la versión breve de la Experiences in Close Relationship en adultos con pareja del mismo sexospa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.source.urlhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/340496668_Validacion_de_la_Version_Breve_de_la_Experiences_in_Close_Relationship_en_Adultos_con_Pareja_del_mismo_Sexospa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP55.2.08spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.referencesAlksnis, C., Desmarais, S., & Wood, E. (1996). Gender differences in scripts for different types of dates. Sex Roles, 34(5-6), 321-336. doi:10.1007/BF01547805spa
dc.relation.referencesAlonso-Arbiol, I., Balluerka, N., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). A Spanish version of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) adult attachment questionnaire. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 45-63. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00141.xspa
dc.relation.referencesAntičević, V., Britvić, D., & Jokić-Begić, N. (2018). Attachment styles and sexuality: The contribution of gender, age and relationship status. Socijalna Psihijatrija, 46(2), 125-141. doi:10.24869/spsih.2018.125spa
dc.relation.referencesArcos-Romero, A. I., & Sierra, J. C. (2019). Factorial invariance, differential item functioning, and norms of the Orgasm Rating Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 19(1), 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.11.001spa
dc.relation.referencesBalsam, K. F., Rothblum, E. D., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2005). Victimization over the life span: A comparison of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual siblings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 477-487. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.477spa
dc.relation.referencesBartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226spa
dc.relation.referencesBartholomew, K., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Methods of assessing adult attachment: Do they converge? En J.A. Simpson & W.S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 25-45). Nueva York, NY: Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238spa
dc.relation.referencesBowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss. Separation: Anxiety and anger (Vol. 2). Nueva York, NY: Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesBowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss (2ª ed., Vol. 1). Nueva York, NY: Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. En J. A. Simpson y W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). Nueva York, NY: Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesCalvillo, C., Sánchez-Fuentes, M. M., & Sierra, J. C. (2018). Revisión sistemática sobre la satisfacción sexual en parejas del mismo sexo. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 9(2), 115-136. doi:10.23923/j.rips.2018.02.018spa
dc.relation.referencesCarretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(3), 521551.spa
dc.relation.referencesCheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5spa
dc.relation.referencesCollins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644spa
dc.relation.referencesCraft, S. M., Serovich, J. M., McKenry, P. C., & Lim, J.-Y. (2008). Stress, attachment style, and partner violence among same-sex couples. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 4(1), 57-73. doi:10.1080/15504280802084456spa
dc.relation.referencesD’Augelli, A. R., Pilkington, N. W., & Hershberger, S. L. (2002). Incidence and mental health impact of sexual orientation victimization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths in high school. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(2), 148-167. doi:10.1521/scpq.17.2.148.20854spa
dc.relation.referencesDel Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 193-214. doi:10.1177/0146167210392789spa
dc.relation.referencesDel Giudice, M. (2019). Sex differences in attachment styles. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 1-5. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.004spa
dc.relation.referencesDomingue, R., & Mollen, D. (2009). Attachment and conflict communication in adult romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(5), 678-696. doi:10.1177/0265407509347932spa
dc.relation.referencesDorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. En P. W. Holland y H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.spa
dc.relation.referencesDunkel, C. S., Lukaszewski, A. W., & Chua, K. (2016). The relationship between sex, life history strategy, and adult romantic attachment style. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 176-178. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.040spa
dc.relation.referencesFarr, R. H., Forssell, S. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2010). Gay, lesbian, and heterosexual adoptive parents: Couple and relationship issues. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 6(2), 199-213. doi:10.1080/15504281003705436spa
dc.relation.referencesFraley, R. C., & Waller, N. G. (1998). Adult attachment patterns: A test of the typological model. En J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 77-114). Nueva York, NY: Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Zapiain, J. (2009). Apego y sexualidad. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Zapiain, J., Ortiz, M. J., & Gómez-Lope, J. (2012). Capacidad para aportar y solicitar apoyo emocional en las relaciones de pareja en relación con los perfiles de apego. Anales de Psicología, 28(1), 302-312.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonsiorek, J. C. (1995). Gay male identities: Concepts and issues. En A. R. D’Augelli & C. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 24-47). Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, A., Padilla, J. L., Hidalgo, M. D., Gómez-Benito, J., & Benítez, I. (2011). EASY-DIF: Software for analyzing differential item functioning using the Mantel- Haenszel and standardization procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(6), 483-484. doi:10.1177/0146621610381489spa
dc.relation.referencesGriffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. En K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: Attachment processes in adulthood (Vol. 5, pp. 17-52). Londres: Jessica Kingsley.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuzmán-González, M., Barrientos, J., Cárdenas, M., Espinoza, M. F., Quijada, P., Rivera, C., …Tapia, P. (2016). Romantic attachment and life satisfaction in a sample of gay men and lesbians in Chile. International Journal of Sexual Health, 28(2), 141-150. doi:10.1080/19317611.2016.1153014spa
dc.relation.referencesGuzman, J., Rovella, A., & Rivarola, M. (2012). La relación de apego y bienestar psicológico en adultos. Revista Diálogos, 3(2), 87-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesHazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511spa
dc.relation.referencesHocking, E. C., Simons, R. M., Simons, J. S., & Freeman, H. (2018). Adult attachment and drinking context as predictors of alcohol problems and relationship satisfaction in college students. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 44(3), 339-347. doi:10.1080/00952990.2017.1344682spa
dc.relation.referencesHu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118spa
dc.relation.referencesJellison, W. A., & McConnell, A. R. (2004). The mediating effects of attitudes toward homosexuality between secure attachment and disclosure outcomes among gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 46(1-2), 159-177. doi:10.1300/j082v46n01_05spa
dc.relation.referencesKatz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2015). (Hetero)sexual compliance with unwanted casual sex: Associations with feelings about first sex and sexual self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 72(9-10), 451-461. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0467-zspa
dc.relation.referencesKelley, K. (2018). MBESS: The MBESS R Package. R package versión 4.4.3. Recuperado de https://CRAN.R- project.org/package=MBESSspa
dc.relation.referencesKinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1998). Sexual behavior in the human male. Indiana: Indiana University Press (Orig. 1948).spa
dc.relation.referencesLafontaine, M. F., Brassard, A., Lussier, Y., Valois, P., Shaver, P. R., & Johnson, S. M. (2016). Selecting the best items for a shortform of the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 140-154. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000243spa
dc.relation.referencesLi, T., & Chan, D. K. S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A metaanalytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 406-419. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1842spa
dc.relation.referencesMcDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacIntosh, H., Reissing, E. D., & Andruff, H. (2010). Same-sex marriage in Canada: The impact of legal marriage on the first cohort of gay and lesbian Canadians to wed. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 19(3), 79-90.spa
dc.relation.referencesMantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the MantelHaenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(303), 690-700. doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500879spa
dc.relation.referencesMark, K. P., Vowels, L. M., & Murray, S. H. (2018). The impact of attachment style on sexual satisfaction and sexual desire in a sexually diverse sample. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(5), 450-458. doi:10.1080/0092623x.2017.1405310spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, C., & Santelices, M. P. (2005). Evaluación del apego en el adulto: Una revisión. Psykhe, 14(1), 181-191. doi:10.4067/S0718-222820050001000280spa
dc.relation.referencesMcLaren, S. (2015). Gender, age, and place of residence as moderators of the internalized homophobia-depressive symptoms relation among Australian gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(4), 463-480. doi:10.1080/00918369.2014.983376spa
dc.relation.referencesMikulincer, M. (2006). Attachment, caregiving, and sex within romantic relationships: A behavioral systems perspective. En M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp. 23-44). Nueva York, NY: Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2ª ed.). Nueva York, NY: Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesMilfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111-121. doi:10.21500/20112084.857spa
dc.relation.referencesMohr, J. J., & Fassinger, R. E. (2003). Selfacceptance and self-disclosure of sexual orientation in lesbian, gay and bisexual adults: An attachment perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 482-495. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.482spa
dc.relation.referencesPepping, C. A., & Halford, W. K. (2012). Attachment and relationship satisfaction in expectant first-time parents: The mediating role of relationship enhancing behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 770-774. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.08.005spa
dc.relation.referencesPeters, G. (2018). Userfriendlyscience: Quantitative analysis made accessible. R package versión 0.7.2. Recuperado de http://userfriendlyscience.comspa
dc.relation.referencesR Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Programa informático]. Viena: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Recuperado de https://www.R-project.org/spa
dc.relation.referencesRidge, S. R. & Feeney, J. A. (1998). Relationship history and relationship attitudes in gay males and lesbians: Attachment style and gender differences. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 32(6), 848-859. doi:10.3109/00048679809073875spa
dc.relation.referencesRiggs, S. A., Cusimano, A. M., & Benson, K. M. (2011). Childhood emotional abuse and attachment processes in the dyadic adjustment of dating couples. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 126-138. doi:10.1037/a0021319spa
dc.relation.referencesRomán, M., Hodges, J., Palacios, J., Moreno, C., & Hillman, S. (2018). Evaluación de las representaciones mentales de apego a través de las historias incompletas: Aplicación Española de Story Stem Assessment Profile (SSAP). Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 1(46), 5-19. doi:10.21865/RIDEP46.1.01spa
dc.relation.referencesRStudio Team. (2018). RStudio: Integrated Development for R [Programa informático]. Boston, MA: RStudio Inc. Recuperado de http://www.rstudio.com/spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Moyano, N., Granados, R., & Sierra, J. C. (2019). Validation of the Spanish version of the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) using self-reported and psychophysiological measures. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 10(1), 1-14. doi:10.23923/j.rips.2018.02.021spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Fuentes, M. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., Byers, E. S., & Sierra, J. C. (2015). Validation of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(9), 1028-1041. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.989307spa
dc.relation.referencesSantos-Iglesias, P., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2009). Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico en muestras españolas. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9(3), 501-517.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships, 11(2), 179-195. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00077.xspa
dc.relation.referencesScharfe, E. (2017). Sex differences in attachment. En T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp 1-5). Nueva York, NY: Springer International.spa
dc.relation.referencesSevilla Rodríguez, A. J., Aparicio García, M. E., & Limiñana Gras, R. M. (2019). La salud de adolescentes y adultos transgénero: Revisión sistemática desde la perspectiva de género. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 1(50), 5-20. doi:10.21865/RIDEP50.1.01spa
dc.relation.referencesSherry, A. (2007). Internalized homophobia and adult attachment: Implications for clinical practice. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(2), 219-225. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.44.2.219spa
dc.relation.referencesSibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2004). Short-term temporal stability and factor structure of the revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) measure of adult attachment. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 969-975. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00165-Xspa
dc.relation.referencesSierra, J. C., Moyano, N., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Gómez-Berrocal, C. (2018). An abridged Spanish version of Sexual Double Standard Scale: Factorial structure, reliability and validity evidence. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18(1), 69-80. doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesSimon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97-120. doi: 10.1007/BF01542219spa
dc.relation.referencesSperling, M. B., & Berman, W. H. (Eds.) (1994). Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives. Nueva York, NY: Guilford Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesStarks, T. J., & Parsons, J. T. (2014). Adult attachment among partnered gay men: Patterns and associations with sexual relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(1), 107-117. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0224-8spa
dc.relation.referencesVentura-León, J. (2018). Intervalos de confianza para coeficientes omega: propuesta para el cálculo. Adicciones, 30(1), 77-78. doi:10.20882/adicciones.962spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, C-C. D. C., Schale, C. L., & Broz, K. K. (2010). Adult attachment; lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity; and sexual attitudes of nonheterosexual individuals. Journal of College Counseling, 13(1), 31-49. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2010.tb00046.xspa
dc.relation.referencesWang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Chichester: Higher Education Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-Short Form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187-204. doi:10.1080/00223890701268041spa
dc.relation.referencesYárnoz-Yaben, S., & Comino, P. (2011). Evaluación del apego adulto: Análisis de la convergencia entre diferentes instrumentos. Acción Psicológica, 8(2), 67-85. doi:10.5944/ap.8.2.191spa
dc.relation.referencesZinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., & Yovel, I. (2007). Estimating ωh for structures containing two group factors: Perils and prospects. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31(2), 135-157. doi:10.1177/0146621606291558spa
dc.relation.referencesZumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21- 29. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1177992180spa
dc.relation.referencesZwick, R., Donoghue, J., & Grima, A. (1993). Assessment of differential item functioning for performance tasks. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(3), 233-251. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00425.xspa
dc.title.translatedValidation of the short version of the experiences in close relationship in adults with a same sex partnerspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3120]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC0 1.0 Universal
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC0 1.0 Universal