dc.creator | Chrem Mendez, Patricio | |
dc.creator | Surace, Ezequiel | |
dc.creator | Bérgamo, Yanina | |
dc.creator | Calandri, Ismael | |
dc.creator | Vázquez, Silvia | |
dc.creator | Sevlever, Gustavo | |
dc.creator | Allegri, Ricardo Francisco | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-19T19:44:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-19T19:44:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11323/7372 | |
dc.description.abstract | Biomarcadores de enfermedad de Alzheimer. Dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos. La enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) es uno de los mayores flagelos aún no resueltos que acompañan al
aumento de la expectativa de vida. El gran cambio de paradigma en los últimos años fue consecuencia de descubrir que el depósito amiloideo se presenta hasta 20 años antes, y la degeneración neurofibrilar hasta 10 años
antes, de que aparezca la sintomatología clínica típica de pérdida de memoria. La aparición de los biomarcadores
permitió reestructurar el concepto de la EA, intentándose llegar a una definición molecular de la misma casi
prescindiendo de la emblemática clínica. Existen distintos tipos de biomarcadores de EA disponibles en nuestro
país. Cada uno nos habla de un proceso y un momento distinto de la enfermedad. Aunque su uso clínico aún
se encuentra restringido por cuestiones de costos, existen escenarios particulares en donde sí se justifica, casi
siempre en relación a presentaciones clínicas atípicas o de comienzo muy temprano. Sin embargo, hoy en día ya
nadie discute que son imprescindibles en investigaciones clínicas sobre EA. La incorporación de biomarcadores
en la práctica médica ha generado cambios significativos en la intervención terapéutica de los pacientes, incluso
en un contexto en el que todavía no hay medicamentos modificadores de la enfermedad. | spa |
dc.description.abstract | Alzheimer disease (AD) is one of the major unresolved health burdens accompanying the increase
in life expectancy. The great paradigm shift for this disease has resulted from finding amyloid deposition and neurobrillary degeneration 20 years and 10 years, respectively, prior to onset of the typical clinical
memory loss symptoms. The advent of AD biomarkers has enabled a molecular definition of AD, making the
clinical definition almost dispensable. Various types of AD biomarkers are available in our country. Each biomarker
reflects a particular process and stage of the disease. Although costs restrict their use, the biomarker analysis
may be justified in certain clinical scenarios, such as an early onset or an atypical presentation of the disease.
Today, the usefulness of biomarkers in AD clinical research is beyond question. Furthermore, the introduction of
biomarkers into medical practice has led to significant changes in therapeutic interventions, even in the absence
of disease-modifying drugs. | spa |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | spa |
dc.language.iso | spa | spa |
dc.publisher | Corporación Universidad de la Costa | spa |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | MEDICINA (Buenos Aires) | spa |
dc.subject | biomarcadores de la enfermedad de Alzheimer | spa |
dc.subject | etapas preclínicas | spa |
dc.subject | neuroimágenes | spa |
dc.subject | diagnóstico molecular | spa |
dc.title | Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Where we stand and where we are headed | spa |
dc.title.alternative | Biomarcadores de enfermedad de Alzheimer. Dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos | spa |
dc.type | article | spa |
dcterms.references | 1. World Health Organization and Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia: a public health priority. In: https://
www.who.int/mental_health/publications/dementia_report_2012/en/; accessed March 2019. | spa |
dcterms.references | 2. Allegri RF, Vázquez S, Sevlever G. Enfermedad de Alzheimer: Nuevos paradigmas, 2da. ed. Buenos Aires:
Editorial Polemos, 2018. | spa |
dcterms.references | 3. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, et al. Clinical and
biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s
disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 795-804. | spa |
dcterms.references | 4. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price
D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease:
report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services
Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34:
939-44. | spa |
dcterms.references | 5. Jack CR Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction
to the recommendations from the National Institute on
Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic
guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement
2011; 7: 257-62. | spa |
dcterms.references | 6. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis
of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease:
recommendations from the National Institute on AgingAlzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011;
7: 270-9. | spa |
dcterms.references | 7. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s
Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for
Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 263-9. | spa |
dcterms.references | 8. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining
the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s
Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for
Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7: 280-92. | spa |
dcterms.references | 9. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14: 535-62. | spa |
dcterms.references | 10. Hansson O, Zetterberg H, Buchhave P, Londos E, Blennow
K, Minthon L. Association between CSF biomarkers and
incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol 2006;
5: 228-34. | spa |
dcterms.references | 11. Niikado M, Chrem-Méndez P, Itzcovich T, et al. Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain as a
routine biomarker in a memory clinic. J Gerontol A Biol
Sci Med Sci 2019; 74: 442-5. | spa |
dcterms.references | 12. Hampel H, O’Bryant SE, Molinuevo JL, et al. Blood-based
biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: mapping the road to
the clinic. Nat Rev Neurol 2018; 14: 639-52. | spa |
dcterms.references | 13. Hampel H, Vergallo A, Perry G, Lista S. The Alzheimer
Precision Medicine Initiative. Alzheimer Precision
Medicine Initiative (APMI). J Alzheimers Dis 2019;
68: 1-24. | spa |
dcterms.references | 14. Preische O, Schultz SA, Apel A, et al. Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical
progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Nat
Med 2019; 25: 277-83. | spa |
dcterms.references | 15. Veitcha DP, Weiner MW, Aiseng PS, et al. Understanding
disease progression and improving Alzheimer’s disease
clinical trials: Recent highlights from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Alzheimers Dement 2019;
15: 106-52. | spa |
dcterms.references | 16. Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain´s
default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to
disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008; 1124: 1-38. | spa |
dcterms.references | 17. Allegri RF, Pertierra L, Cohen G, et al. A biological classification for Alzheimer’s disease - Amyloid, Tau and
Neurodegeneration (A/T/N): results from the ArgentineAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Int Psychogeriatr 2019; 12: 1-2. | spa |
dcterms.references | 18. Parra MA, Baez S, Allegri R, et al. Dementia in Latin
America: Assessing the present and envisioning the
future. Neurology 2018; 90: 222-31. | spa |
dcterms.references | 19. Chrem Méndez P, Cohen G, Russo MJ, et al. Concordance
between 11C-PIB-PET and clinical diagnosis in a memory
clinic. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2015; 30: 599-
606. | spa |
dcterms.references | 20. Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C, et al. Association of
amyloid positron emission tomography with subsequent
change in clinical management among medicare beneficiaries with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. JAMA
2019; 321: 1286-94. | spa |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | spa |
dc.source.url | http://www.medicinabuenosaires.com/PMID/31864224.pdf | spa |
dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | spa |