Show simple item record

dc.creatorWang, Weifang
dc.creatorvan Noorloos, Femke
dc.creatorSpit, Tejo
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-22T23:50:49Z
dc.date.available2021-01-22T23:50:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/7759
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding stakeholder power relations—such as between land sellers, land buyers, and local governments—is crucial to understanding Land Value Capture (LVC). While scholars have focused on stakeholder relationships through approaches such as stakeholder salience, stakeholder interaction, stakeholder value network, and stakeholder multiplicity, much research either places insufficient focus on power or only stresses partial attributes of power. As a result, the role of power relations among key stakeholders in LVC remains insufficiently explored. Our contribution is a new analytical framework for stakeholder power dynamics surrounding LVC. This provides an empirical analysis by comparing the public (China) and the private (U.S.) dominant regimes, through the perspectives of power direction, strength, and mechanism. To conceptualize the three perspectives of power in LVC, we constructed an analytical matrix and then categorized data in terms of stakeholder, space, and time perspectives. Based on empirical findings, four emerging dilemmas shed light on consequences for LVC policy making as well as areas in need of further researchspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceland use policyspa
dc.subjectLand Value Capturespa
dc.subjectpower relationspa
dc.subjectstakeholderspa
dc.subjectpublic propertyspa
dc.subjectprivate propertyspa
dc.titleStakeholder power relations in Land Value Capture: comparing public (China) and private (U.S.) dominant regimesspa
dc.typearticlespa
dcterms.referencesLand-property markets and planning: A special case Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 533-540spa
dcterms.referencesA theory of the urban land market Papers in Regional Science, 6 (1960), pp. 149-157spa
dcterms.referencesLand use regulations and property values: The’Windfalls Capture’idea revisited (2012), pp. 755-786spa
dcterms.referencesTaxing land for urban containment: Reflections on a Dutch debate Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 233-241spa
dcterms.referencesFactors Influencing the Value of Urban Land: Evidence from Halifax‐Dartmouth, Canada Real Estate Economics, 13 (1985), pp. 361-377spa
dcterms.referencesThe causal structure of land price determinants Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 54 (2006), pp. 227-245spa
dcterms.referencesPerformance-based planning: perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25 (2006), pp. 396-409spa
dcterms.referencesConspicuous consumption behavior of land-lost farmers: A perspective of social identity Cities, 66 (2017), pp. 81-90spa
dcterms.referencesBao and Peng, 2016 H. Bao, Y. Peng Effect of land expropriation on land-lost farmers’ entrepreneurial action: A case study of Zhejiang Province Habitat International, 53 (2016), pp. 342-349spa
dcterms.referencesBatt, 2001 H.W. Batt Value Capture as a Policy Tool in Transportation Economics: An Exploration in Public Finance in the Tradition of Henry George American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60 (2001), pp. 195-228spa
dcterms.referencesBeaton, 1991 W.P. Beaton The impact of regional land-use controls on property values: the case of the New Jersey Pinelands Land Economics, 67 (1991), pp. 172-194spa
dcterms.referencesBeritelli and Laesser, 2011 P. Beritelli, C. Laesser Power dimensions and influence reputation in tourist destinations: Empirical evidence from a network of actors and stakeholders Tourism Management, 32 (2011), pp. 1299-1309spa
dcterms.referencesBorras, 2003 S.M. Borras Questioning market‐led agrarian reform: Experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa Journal of agrarian change, 3 (2003), pp. 367-394spa
dcterms.referencesBoucher et al., 2005 S.R. Boucher, B.L. Barham, M.R. Carter The Impact of “Market-Friendly” Reforms on Credit and Land Markets in Honduras and Nicaragua World Development, 33 (2005), pp. 107-128spa
dcterms.referencesBowman and Ambrosini, 2000 C. Bowman, V. Ambrosini Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy British journal of management, 11 (2000), pp. 1-15spa
dcterms.referencesBoyd, 2011 D. Boyd Land Value Taxation: Theory, Evidence, and Practice F. Richard (Ed.), Dye and Richard W, Wiley Online Library, England (2011)spa
dcterms.referencesCai, 2017 M. Cai Revenue, time horizon, and land allocation in China Land Use Policy, 62 (2017), pp. 101-112spa
dcterms.referencesCameron et al., 2011 B.G. Cameron, E.F. Crawley, W. Feng, M. Lin Strategic decisions in complex stakeholder environments: a theory of generalized exchange Engineering Management Journal, 23 (2011), pp. 37-45spa
dcterms.referencesCao et al., 2008 G. Cao, C. Feng, R. Tao Local “land finance” in China’s urban expansion: challenges and solutions China & World Economy, 16 (2008), pp. 19-30spa
dcterms.referencesCapozza et al., 2002 D.R. Capozza, P.H. Hendershott, C. Mack, C.J. Mayer Determinants of real house price dynamics National Bureau of Economic Research. (2002)spa
dcterms.referencesChapman, 2017 J. Chapman Value Capture Taxation as an Infrastructure Funding Technique Public Works Management & Policy, 22 (2017), pp. 31-37spa
dcterms.referencesChen and Kung, 2016 T. Chen, J.K.S. Kung Do land revenue windfalls create a political resource curse? Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 123 (2016), pp. 86-106spa
dcterms.referencesCheshire and Sheppard, 1995 P. Cheshire, S. Sheppard On the price of land and the value of amenities Economica (1995), pp. 247-267spa
dcterms.referencesCheshire, 2013 P.C. Cheshire Land market regulation: market versus policy failures Journal of property research, 30 (2013), pp. 170-188spa
dcterms.referencesChi-Man Hui et al., 2004 E. Chi-Man Hui, V. Sze-Mun Ho, D. Kim-Hin Ho Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100spa
dcterms.referencesChoumert and Phélinas, 2015 J. Choumert, P. Phélinas Determinants of agricultural land values in Argentina Ecological Economics, 110 (2015), pp. 134-140spa
dcterms.referencesCigdem and Wood, 2012 M. Cigdem, G. Wood Choice and government intervention in housing markets International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (2012), pp. 137-143spa
dcterms.referencesColeman and Grimes, 2010 A. Coleman, A. Grimes Betterment taxes, capital gains and benefit cost ratios Economics Letters, 109 (2010), pp. 54-56spa
dcterms.referencesColwell and Munneke, 1997 P.F. Colwell, H.J. Munneke The structure of urban land prices Journal of Urban Economics, 41 (1997), pp. 321-336spa
dcterms.referencesConnolly and Wall, 2016 C. Connolly, A. Wall Value capture: A valid means of funding PPPs? Financial Accountability & Management, 32 (2016), pp. 157-178spa
dcterms.referencesCzyżewski and Matuszczak, 2016 B. Czyżewski, A. Matuszczak A new land rent theory for sustainable agriculture Land Use Policy, 55 (2016), pp. 222-229spa
dcterms.referencesCzyżewski et al., 2017 B. Czyżewski, G. Przekota, A. Poczta-Wajda The incidence of agricultural policy on the land market in Poland: Two-dimensional and multilevel analysis Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 174-185spa
dcterms.referencesDavis and Heathcote, 2007 M.A. Davis, J. Heathcote The price and quantity of residential land in the United States Journal of Monetary Economics, 54 (2007), pp. 2595-2620spa
dcterms.referencesDavis and Palumbo, 2008 M.A. Davis, M.G. Palumbo The price of residential land in large US cities Journal of Urban Economics, 63 (2008), pp. 352-384spa
dcterms.referencesde Bussy and Kelly, 2010 N.M. de Bussy, L. Kelly Stakeholders, politics and power: Towards an understanding of stakeholder identification and salience in government Journal of Communication Management, 14 (2010), pp. 289-305spa
dcterms.referencesDiamond, 1985 N. Diamond Rural Collectivization and Decollectivization in China—A Review Article The Journal of Asian Studies, 44 (1985), pp. 785-792spa
dcterms.referencesDing, 2003 C. Ding Land policy reform in China: assessment and prospects Land use policy, 20 (2003), pp. 109-120spa
dcterms.referencesDing, 2007 C. Ding Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China Land use policy, 24 (2007), pp. 1-13spa
dcterms.referencesDing and Zhao, 2014 C. Ding, X. Zhao Land market, land development and urban spatial structure in Beijing Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 83-90spa
dcterms.referencesDu et al., 2015 J. Du, Y. Lu, Z. Tao Government expropriation and Chinese-style firm diversification Journal of Comparative Economics, 43 (2015), pp. 155-169spa
dcterms.referencesDu et al., 2014 J. Du, J.-C. Thill, R.B. Peiser, C. Feng Urban land market and land-use changes in post-reform China: A case study of Beijing Landscape and Urban Planning, 124 (2014), pp. 118-128spa
dcterms.referencesEddie et al., 2004 C.M.H. Eddie, S.M.H. Vivian, K.H.H. David Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore: A comparative analysis Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22 (2004), pp. 76-100spa
dcterms.referencesEidelman, 2016 G. Eidelman Rethinking public land ownership and urban development: A Canadian perspective Cities, 55 (2016), pp. 122-126spa
dcterms.referencesEmerson, 1962 R.M. Emerson Power-dependence relations American sociological review (1962), pp. 31-41spa
dcterms.referencesEvans, 1983 A.W. Evans The determination of the price of land Urban Studies, 20 (1983), pp. 119-129spa
dcterms.referencesEvans, 1999 A.W. Evans The land market and government intervention Handbook of regional and urban economics, 3 (1999), pp. 1637-1669spa
dcterms.referencesFeng et al., 2014 L. Feng, H.X.H. Bao, Y. Jiang Land reallocation reform in rural China: A behavioral economics perspective Land Use Policy, 41 (2014), pp. 246-259spa
dcterms.referencesFeng, 2013 W. Feng Strategic management for large engineering projects: the stakeholder value network approach Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2013)spa
dcterms.referencesFloetotto et al., 2016 M. Floetotto, M. Kirker, J. Stroebel Government intervention in the housing market: Who wins, who loses? Journal of Monetary Economics, 80 (2016), pp. 106-123spa
dcterms.referencesFord and Johnson, 1998 R. Ford, C. Johnson The perception of power: Dependence and legitimacy in conflict Social Psychology Quarterly (1998), pp. 16-32spa
dcterms.referencesFoucault, 1991 M. Foucault The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality University of Chicago Press (1991)spa
dcterms.referencesFoucault, 1998 M. Foucault J. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 2 (1998)spa
dcterms.referencesFriis and Nielsen, 2016 C. Friis, J.Ø. Nielsen Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 117-129spa
dcterms.referencesFrooman, 1999 J. Frooman Stakeholder influence strategies Academy of management review, 24 (1999), pp. 191-205spa
dcterms.referencesGao et al., 2017 J. Gao, W. Chen, F. Yuan Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: I. Theoretical considerations Land Use Policy, 68 (2017), pp. 604-613spa
dcterms.referencesGarza and Lizieri, 2016 N. Garza, C. Lizieri A spatial-temporal assessment of the Land Value Development Tax Land Use Policy, 50 (2016), pp. 449-460spa
dcterms.referencesGaventa, 2003 J. Gaventa Power after Lukes: an overview of theories of power since Lukes and their application to development Participation Group, Institute of Development Studies., Brighton (2003)spa
dcterms.referencesGhatak and Mookherjee, 2014 M. Ghatak, D. Mookherjee Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers Journal of Development Economics, 110 (2014), pp. 303-312spa
dcterms.referencesGleeson, 1994 B. Gleeson Reforming planning legislation: a New Zealand perspective (1994)spa
dcterms.referencesGuo et al., 2015 S. Guo, L. Liu, Y. Zhao The business cycle implications of land financing in China Economic Modelling, 46 (2015), pp. 225-237spa
dcterms.referencesHan and Kung, 2015 L. Han, J.K.-S. Kung Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: Evidence from China Journal of Development Economics, 116 (2015), pp. 89-104spa
dcterms.referencesHankinson, 2009 G. Hankinson Managing destination brands: establishing a theoretical foundation Journal of Marketing Management, 25 (2009), pp. 97-115spa
dcterms.referencesHaque and Asami, 2014 A. Haque, Y. Asami Optimizing urban land use allocation for planners and real estate developers Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 46 (2014), pp. 57-69spa
dcterms.referencesHein et al., 2017 A.M. Hein, M. Jankovic, W. Feng, R. Farel, J.H. Yune, B. Yannou Stakeholder power in industrial symbioses: A stakeholder value network approach Journal of Cleaner Production, 148 (2017), pp. 923-933spa
dcterms.referencesHu and Qian, 2017 F.Z.Y. Hu, J. Qian Land-based finance, fiscal autonomy and land supply for affordable housing in urban China: A prefecture-level analysis Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 454-460spa
dcterms.referencesHuang et al., 2017 X. Huang, X. Huang, Y. He, X. Yang Assessment of livelihood vulnerability of land-lost farmers in urban fringes: A case study of Xi’an, China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 1-9spa
dcterms.referencesHuang and Du, 2017 Z. Huang, X. Du Government intervention and land misallocation: Evidence from China Cities, 60 (2017), pp. 323-332spa
dcterms.referencesHui et al., 2013 E.C.M. Hui, H.J. Bao, X.L. Zhang The policy and praxis of compensation for land expropriations in China: An appraisal from the perspective of social exclusion Land Use Policy, 32 (2013), pp. 309-316spa
dcterms.referencesIngram and Hong, 2012 G.K. Ingram, Y.-h. Hong Value capture and land policies Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2012)spa
dcterms.referencesIto et al., 2016 J. Ito, M. Nishikori, M. Toyoshi, H.N. Feuer The contribution of land exchange institutions and markets in countering farmland abandonment in Japan Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 582-593spa
dcterms.referencesJaeger, 2013 W.K. Jaeger Determinants of urban land market outcomes: Evidence from California Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 966-973spa
dcterms.referencesJäger, 2009 J. Jäger Land rent theory (2009)spa
dcterms.referencesJones, 2014 C. Jones Land use planning policies and market forces: Utopian aspirations thwarted? Land Use Policy, 38 (2014), pp. 573-579spa
dcterms.referencesLarsen et al., 2009 I.K. Larsen, M. Småstuen, T.B. Johannesen, F. Langmark, D.M. Parkin, F. Bray, B.J.E.j.o.c Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness European Journal of Cancer, 45 (2009), pp. 1218-1231spa
dcterms.referencesLeeper et al., 2010 E.M. Leeper, T.B. Walker, S.-C.S. Yang Government investment and fiscal stimulus Journal of monetary Economics, 57 (2010), pp. 1000-1012spa
dcterms.referencesLepak et al., 2007 D.P. Lepak, K.G. Smith, M.S. Taylor Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective Academy of management review, 32 (2007), pp. 180-194spa
dcterms.referencesLerman and Shagaida, 2007 Z. Lerman, N. Shagaida Land policies and agricultural land markets in Russia Land Use Policy, 24 (2007), pp. 14-23spa
dcterms.referencesLichtenberg and Ding, 2009 E. Lichtenberg, C. Ding Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China Journal of Urban Economics, 66 (2009), pp. 57-64spa
dcterms.referencesLin and Zhu, 2014 R. Lin, D. Zhu A spatial and temporal analysis on land incremental values coupled with land rights in China Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 168-176spa
dcterms.referencesLiu et al., 2016 T. Liu, G. Cao, Y. Yan, R.Y. Wang Urban land marketization in China: Central policy, local initiative, and market mechanism Land Use Policy, 57 (2016), pp. 265-276spa
dcterms.referencesLiu et al., 2014 Y. Liu, F. Fang, Y. Li Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 6-12spa
dcterms.referencesLong, 2014 H. Long Land use policy in China: Introduction Land Use Policy, 40 (2014), pp. 1-5spa
dcterms.referencesMathur, 2013 S. Mathur Use of land pooling and reconstitution for urban development: Experiences from Gujarat, India Habitat International, 38 (2013), pp. 199-206spa
dcterms.referencesMedda, 2012 F. Medda Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: a review Journal of Transport Geography, 25 (2012), pp. 154-161spa
dcterms.referencesMeehan and Wright, 2011 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright Power priorities: A buyer–seller comparison of areas of influence Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17 (2011), pp. 32-41spa
dcterms.referencesMeehan and Wright, 2012 J. Meehan, G.H. Wright The origins of power in buyer–seller relationships Industrial Marketing Management, 41 (2012), pp. 669-679spa
dcterms.referencesMerinero-Rodríguez and Pulido-Fernández, 2016 R. Merinero-Rodríguez, J.I. Pulido-Fernández Analysing relationships in tourism: A review Tourism Management, 54 (2016), pp. 122-135spa
dcterms.referencesMill, 1884 J.S. Mill Principles of political economy D. Appleton (1884)spa
dcterms.referencesMills, 1969 E.S. Mills The value of urban land (1969)spa
dcterms.referencesMiraftab, 2004 F. Miraftab Public-private partnerships: The Trojan horse of neoliberal development? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24 (2004), pp. 89-101spa
dcterms.referencesMitchell et al., 1997 R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts Academy of management review, 22 (1997), pp. 853-886spa
dcterms.referencesMittal, 2014 J. Mittal Self-financing land and urban development via land readjustment and value capture Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 314-323spa
dcterms.referencesMoroni, 2010 S. Moroni Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy Planning Theory, 9 (2010), pp. 137-155spa
dcterms.referencesNeedham, 1992 B. Needham A theory of land prices when land is supplied publicly: the case of the Netherlands Urban Studies, 29 (1992), pp. 669-686spa
dcterms.referencesNeville and Menguc, 2006 B.A. Neville, B. Menguc Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders Journal of Business Ethics, 66 (2006), pp. 377-391spa
dcterms.referencesObeng-Odoom, 2012 F. Obeng-Odoom Land reforms in Africa: Theory, practice, and outcome Habitat International, 36 (2012), pp. 161-170spa
dcterms.referencesOliver, 1991 C. Oliver Strategic responses to institutional processes Academy of management review, 16 (1991), pp. 145-179spa
dcterms.referencesPaik, 2014 W. Paik Land Developers, States, and Collusive Clientelism in Marketizing China Pacific Focus, 29 (2014), pp. 68-91spa
dcterms.referencesPan et al., 2017 F. Pan, F. Zhang, S. Zhu, D. Wójcik Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China Urban Studies, 54 (2017), pp. 897-916spa
dcterms.referencesPan et al., 2015 J.-N. Pan, J.-T. Huang, T.-F. Chiang Empirical study of the local government deficit, land finance and real estate markets in China China Economic Review, 32 (2015), pp. 57-67spa
dcterms.referencesPhuc et al., 2014 N.Q. Phuc, A. Van Westen, A. Zoomers Agricultural land for urban development: The process of land conversion in Central Vietnam Habitat International, 41 (2014), pp. 1-7spa
dcterms.referencesPils, 2016 E. Pils Assessing evictions and expropriations in China: Efficiency, credibility and rights Land Use Policy, 58 (2016), pp. 437-444spa
dcterms.referencesQian, 2015 Z. Qian Land acquisition compensation in post-reform China: Evolution, structure and challenges in Hangzhou Land Use Policy, 46 (2015), pp. 250-257spa
dcterms.referencesQun et al., 2015 W. Qun, L. Yongle, Y. Siqi The incentives of China’s urban land finance Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 432-442spa
dcterms.referencesRabinow, 1991 P. Rabinow The Foulcault reader: an introduction to Foulcault’s thought Penguin, London (1991)spa
dcterms.referencesRebelo, 2017 E.M. Rebelo Land betterment capture revisited: A methodology for territorial plans Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 392-407spa
dcterms.referencesRowley, 1997 T.J. Rowley Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences Academy of management Review, 22 (1997), pp. 887-910spa
dcterms.referencesSaito and Ruhanen, 2017 H. Saito, L. Ruhanen Power in tourism stakeholder collaborations: Power types and power holders Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31 (2017), pp. 189-196spa
dcterms.referencesScoones, 1998 I. Scoones Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis (1998)spa
dcterms.referencesShan et al., 2017 L. Shan, A.T.W. Yu, Y. Wu Strategies for risk management in urban–rural conflict: Two case studies of land acquisition in urbanising China Habitat International, 59 (2017), pp. 90-100spa
dcterms.referencesShaw and Williams, 1994 G. Shaw, A.M. Williams Critical issues in tourism: a geographical perspective Blackwell Publishers (1994)spa
dcterms.referencesSheehan and Ritchie, 2005 L.R. Sheehan, J.B. Ritchie Destination stakeholders exploring identity and salience Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (2005), pp. 711-734spa
dcterms.referencesSikor and Müller, 2009 T. Sikor, D. Müller The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction World Development, 37 (2009), pp. 1307-1316spa
dcterms.referencesSlegtenhorst, 2013 I. Slegtenhorst From value creation to value capture: Instruments of indirect value capture to fund investments in road infrastructure projects (2013)spa
dcterms.referencesSmall, 2007 L.-A. Small The sustainable rural livelihoods approach: a critical review Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement, 28 (2007), pp. 27-38spa
dcterms.referencesSmith and Gihring, 2006 J.J. Smith, T.A. Gihring Financing transit systems through value capture American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65 (2006), pp. 751-786spa
dcterms.referencesSmolka, 2013 M.O. Smolka Implementing value capture in Latin America: Policies and tools for urban development Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2013)spa
dcterms.referencesSuhardiman et al., 2015 D. Suhardiman, M. Giordano, O. Keovilignavong, T. Sotoukee Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss Land Use Policy, 49 (2015), pp. 195-202spa
dcterms.referencesSun et al., 2017 J. Sun, T. Chen, Z. Cheng, C.C. Wang, X. Ning A financing mode of Urban Rail transit based on land value capture: A case study in Wuhan City Transport Policy, 57 (2017), pp. 59-67spa
dcterms.referencesSuzuki et al., 2015 H. Suzuki, J. Murakami, Y.-H. Hong, B. Tamayose Financing transit-oriented development with land values: Adapting land value capture in developing countries World Bank Publications (2015)spa
dcterms.referencesTao et al., 2010 R. Tao, F. Su, M. Liu, G. Cao Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities Urban Studies, 47 (2010), pp. 2217-2236spa
dcterms.referencesTian and Ma, 2009 L. Tian, W. Ma Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply Land Use Policy, 26 (2009), pp. 599-609spa
dcterms.referencesTimur and Getz, 2008 S. Timur, D. Getz A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20 (2008), pp. 445-461spa
dcterms.referencesTu et al., 2014 F. Tu, X. Yu, J. Ruan Industrial land use efficiency under government intervention: Evidence from Hangzhou, China Habitat International, 43 (2014), pp. 1-10spa
dcterms.referencesTura, 2018 H.A. Tura Land rights and land grabbing in Oromia, Ethiopia Land Use Policy, 70 (2018), pp. 247-255spa
dcterms.referencesVan der Krabben and Jacobs, 2013 E. Van der Krabben, H.M. Jacobs Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience Land Use Policy, 30 (2013), pp. 774-783spa
dcterms.referencesVenkatraman, 1989 N. Venkatraman The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence Academy of management review, 14 (1989), pp. 423-444spa
dcterms.referencesWalters, 2013 L.C. Walters Land value capture in policy and practice Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration, 10 (2013), p. 5spa
dcterms.referencesWang and Ye, 2016 W. Wang, F. Ye The political economy of land finance in China Public Budgeting & Finance, 36 (2016), pp. 91-110spa
dcterms.referencesWang and Hui, 2017 Y. Wang, E.C.-m. Hui Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China China Economic Review, 43 (2017), pp. 196-215spa
dcterms.referencesWang et al., 2015 Y. Wang, D. Potoglou, S. Orford, Y. Gong Bus stop, property price and land value tax: A multilevel hedonic analysis with quantile calibration Land Use Policy, 42 (2015), pp. 381-391spa
dcterms.referencesWeersink et al., 1999 A. Weersink, S. Clark, C.G. Turvey, R. Sarker The effect of agricultural policy on farmland values Land Economics (1999), pp. 425-439spa
dcterms.referencesWeixin and Dongsong, 1990 L. Weixin, Y. Dongsong China’s land use policy under change Land use policy, 7 (1990), pp. 198-201spa
dcterms.referencesWendt, 1957 P.F. Wendt Theory of urban land values Land economics, 33 (1957), pp. 228-240spa
dcterms.referencesWenner, 2016 F. Wenner Sustainable urban development and land value taxation: The case of Estonia Land Use Policy. (2016)spa
dcterms.referencesWilcox, 2016 R.K. Wilcox An introduction to basic mechanics Orthopaedics and Trauma, 30 (2016), pp. 169-175spa
dcterms.referencesWineman and Liverpool-Tasie, 2017 A. Wineman, L.S. Liverpool-Tasie Land markets and the distribution of land in northwestern Tanzania Land Use Policy, 69 (2017), pp. 550-563spa
dcterms.referencesWrong, 2017 D. Wrong Power: Its forms, bases and uses Routledge (2017)spa
dcterms.referencesXiaoyan and Xiaoshu, 2014 H. Xiaoyan, C. Xiaoshu Mode and Mechanism of Urban Land Redevelopment Journal of Landscape Research, 6 (2014), p. 22spa
dcterms.referencesYan et al., 2014 S. Yan, X.J. Ge, Q. Wu Government intervention in land market and its impacts on land supply and new housing supply: Evidence from major Chinese markets Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 517-527spa
dcterms.referencesYe and Wang, 2013 F. Ye, W. Wang Determinants of land finance in China: a study based on provincial-level panel data (2013)spa
dcterms.referencesZhang and Xu, 2017 W. Zhang, H. Xu Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: A panel data analysis for Chinese provinces Land Use Policy, 63 (2017), pp. 493-500spa
dcterms.referencesZhang et al., 2017 X. Zhang, Y. Lin, Y. Wu, M. Skitmore Industrial land price between China’s Pearl River Delta and Southeast Asian regions: Competition or Coopetition? Land Use Policy, 61 (2017), pp. 575-586spa
dcterms.referencesZhang, 1997 X.Q. Zhang Urban land reform in China Land use policy, 14 (1997), pp. 187-199spa
dcterms.referencesZheng et al., 2014 H. Zheng, X. Wang, S. Cao The land finance model jeopardizes China’s sustainable development Habitat International, 44 (2014), pp. 130-136spa
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.source.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718317940#!spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104357


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International