Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGómez Martín, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorClemente-Suárez, Vicente Javier
dc.contributor.authorRamos Campo, Domingo Jesús
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of block (BP) and a reverse training periodization (RP) in the hematological and running performance of amateur trained athletes. Modifications in hematological, aerobic, and anaerobic running performance and countermovement jump before and after twelve weeks of BP vs. RP training programs were analyzed in 16 trained athletes (eight males: 40.0 ± 6.2 years; 179.2 ± 12.8 cm; 73.8 ± 12.2 kg; and eight females: 34.2 ± 4.1 years; 163.4 ± 9.6 cm; 57.0 ± 11.0 kg). A significant decrease in heart rate (HR) at ventilatory threshold (VT1) (p = 0.031; ES = 1.40) was observed in RP without changes in BP. In addition, RP increased significantly VO2max (p = 0.004; ES = 0.47), speed at VO2max (p = 0.001; ES = 1.07), HR at VT2 (p < 0.001; ES = 1.32) and VT1 (p = 0.046; ES = 0.57), while BP improved VO2max (p = 0.004; ES = 0.51), speed at VO 2 max (p = 0.016; ES = 0.92), and HR at VT2 (p = 0.023; ES = 0.78). In addition, only RP increased anaerobic performance in a running-based anaerobic sprint test (RAST) (mean sprint: p = 0.009; ES = 0.40, best sprint: p = 0.019; ES = 0.30 and total time: p = 0.009; ES = 0.40). Moreover, both types of training periodization proposed in this study maintained hematological values and efficiently improved jump performance (p = 0.044; ES = 0.6) in RP and p = 0.001; ES = 0.75 in BP). Therefore, twelve weeks of either RP or BP is an effective strategy to increase jump and aerobic running performance maintaining hematological values, but only RP increases anaerobic running
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthspa
dc.titleHematological and running performance modification of trained athletes after reverse vs. block training periodizationspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dcterms.referencesEffectiveness of Reverse vs. Traditional Linear Training Periodization in Triathlonspa
dcterms.referencesValidity and Reliability of a 10 Hz GPS for Assessing Variable and Mean Running Speedspa
dcterms.referencesAutonomic Adaption to Clinical Simulation in Psychology Students: Teaching Applicationsspa
dcterms.referencesDo traditional and reverse swimming training periodizations lead to similar aerobic performance improvements?spa
dcterms.referencesAmateur endurance triathletes’ performance is improved independently of volume or intensity based trainingspa
dcterms.referencesThe Use of Autonomic Modulation Device to Control Training Performance after High-Intensity Interval Training Programspa
dcterms.referencesEffect of α-tocopherol megadoses on hematologic parameters and antioxidant capacity of rats in an ultraendurance probespa
dcterms.referencesEffectiveness of an applied high intensity interval training as a specific operative trainingspa
dcterms.referencesDo traditional and reverse swimming training periodizations lead to similar aerobic performance improvements?spa
dcterms.referencesPeriodized training archive better autonomic modulation and aerobic performance than non periodized trainingspa

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Artículos científicos [2634]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International