Show simple item record

dc.creatorTariq, Muhammad Imran
dc.creatorDiaz-Martinez, Jorge
dc.creatoraziz, shariq
dc.creatorJavaid, Muhammad Adeel
dc.creatorDe-La-Hoz-Franco, Emiro
dc.creatorMihaela Dicu, Anca
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T18:26:07Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T18:26:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2194-5357
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/7957
dc.description.abstractThe utilization of games and its components in software building training isn’t new. In reality, their usage in Software development training is found to look into papers for numerous decades. Be that as it may, there is little data about the real reception of these methodologies in games designing and development training in terms of software building. Consequently, the objective of this paper is to research the utilization of game’s components in programming designing instruction, in the viewpoint of teachers. To accomplish this objective, this examination proposes and breaks down the aftereffects of a study replied by numerous product designing teachers. We test the members by welcoming multiple instructors from settled colleges and instructive organizations of various districts. The first objective of the review is to gather data relates to the utilization of important games and rich gamification in the student classrooms, and the second objective is to comprehend information territories and the pre-owned game-related techniques. The outcomes show that the more significant part of the educators knows about these instructive methodologies, the games were embraced by various members. Games that are generally played to cover “Programming Process” & “Task Management.” The utmost utilized game apparatuses are Points scoring, Quizzes solving, and meet challenges. The outcomes additionally reveal that the fundamental explanations behind not embracing the assets are the absence of information, lack of data about essential games for encouraging programming designing, and the absence of time to design and remember these methodologies for the classes At long last, results show a definite propensity towards the future appropriation of these game-related methodologies by the product developing teachers.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computingspa
dc.subjectGames designspa
dc.subjectGame developmentspa
dc.subjectSoftware engineeringspa
dc.subjectGames-based learningspa
dc.titleA learners experience with the games education in software engineeringspa
dc.typearticlespa
dcterms.referencesArdis, M., Budgen, D., Hislop, G.W., Offutt, J., Sebern, M., Visser, W.: SE 2014: curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in software engineering. Computer 11, 106–109 (2015)spa
dcterms.referencesPedreira, O., García, F., Brisaboa, N., Piattini, M.: Gamification in software engineering–a systematic mapping. Inf. Softw. Technol. 57, 157–168 (2015)spa
dcterms.referencesAkola, B.S., Slany, W.: Enhancing software engineering student team engagement in a high-intensity extreme programming course using gamification. In: 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), pp. 149–153. IEEE (2014)spa
dcterms.referencesAlbayrak, O.: Instructor’s acceptance of games utilization in undergraduate software engineering education: a pilot study in Turkey. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering, pp. 43–49. IEEE (2015)spa
dcterms.referencesBaker, A., Navarro, E.O., Van Der Hoek, A.: Problems and programmers: an educational software engineering card game. In: 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings, pp. 614–619. IEEE (2003)spa
dcterms.referencesCaulfield, C., Xia, J.C., Veal, D., Maj, S.: A systematic survey of games used for software engineering education. Modern Appl. Sci. 5(6), 28–43 (2011)spa
dcterms.referencesDeterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., Dixon, D.: Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In: CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2425–2428 (2011)spa
dcterms.referencesEasterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.A., Damian, D.: Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In: Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 285–311. Springer, London (2008)spa
dcterms.referencesFernandes, E., Oliveira, J., Figueiredo, E.: Investigating how features of online learning support software process education. In: proceedings of the 46th Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Erie (2016)spa
dcterms.referencesFigueiredo, E., Pereira, J., Garcia, L., Lourdes, L.: On the evaluation of an open software engineering course. In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Madrid, Spain (2014)spa
dcterms.referencesLattes Platform. http://lattes.cnpq.br/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017spa
dcterms.referencesSnijders, R., Dalpiaz, F., Brinkkemper, S., Hosseini, M., Ali, R., Ozum, A.: REfine: a gamified platform for participatory requirements engineering. In: 2015 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Crowd-Based Requirements Engineering (CrowdRE), pp. 1–6. IEEE, August, 2015spa
dcterms.referencesMarques, M.R., Quispe, A., Ochoa, F.S.: A systematic mapping study on practical approaches to teaching software engineering. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (2014)spa
dcterms.referencesNavarro, E., Van Der Hoek, A.: Multi-site evaluation of SimSE. In: ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 1 (2009)spa
dcterms.referencesOliveira, C., Cintra, M., Neto, F.M.: Learning risk management in software projects with a serious game based on intelligent agents and fuzzy systems. In: 8th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT) (2013)spa
dcterms.referencesPfleeger, S., Kitchenham, B.: Principles of survey research: part 1: turning lemons into lemonade. In: SIGSOFT Software. Engineering Notes, vol. 26, no. 6, 16–18, November 2001spa
dcterms.referencesRevilla, M.A., Manzoor, S., Liu, R.: Competitive learning in informatics: the UVa online judge experience. Olympiads Informat. 2, 131–148 (2008)spa
dcterms.referencesTariq, M.I.: Towards information security metrics framework for cloud computing. Int. J. Cloud Comput. Serv. Sci. 1(4), 209 (2012)spa
dcterms.referencesSouza, M., Veado, L., Moreira, R., Figueiredo, E., Xavier, H.: Games for learning: bridging game-related education methods to software engineering knowledge areas. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Software Engineering Education and Training track, Buenos Aires, pp. 170–179, (2017)spa
dcterms.referencesSouza, M., Constantino, K., Veado, L., Figueiredo, E.: Gamification in software engineering education: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Savannah, US, pp. 276–284 (2017)spa
dcterms.referencesButt, S.A.: Study of agile methodology with the cloud. Pacific Sci. Rev. B: Human. Soc. Sci. 2(1), 22–28 (2016)spa
dcterms.referencesUskov, V., Sekar, B.: Gamification of software engineering curriculum. In: Frontiers In Education Conference (FIE) (2014)spa
dcterms.referencesVerdu, E., Regueras, L.M., Verdu, M.J., Leal, J.P., Castro, J.P., Queiros, R.: A distributed system for learning programming on-line. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 1–10 (2012)spa
dcterms.referencesWangenheim, C.G.V., Shull, F.: To game or not to game? IEEE Softw. 26(2), 92–94 (2009)spa
dcterms.referencesTariq, M.I., Tayyaba, S., Ashraf, M.W., Rasheed, H., Khan, F.: Analysis of NIST SP 800–53 Rev. 3 Controls Effectiveness for Cloud Computing. Computing, vol. 3, no. 4 (2016)spa
dcterms.referencesTariq, M.I.: SLA based information security metrics in cloud computing: a complete guide to measure information security of cloud computing. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing (2014)spa
dcterms.referencesButt, S.A., Abbas, S.A., Ahsan, M.: Software development life cycle & software quality measuring types. Asian J. Math. Comput. Res. 11(2), 112–122 (2016)spa
dcterms.referencesButt, S.A.: Analysis of unfair means cases in computer-based examination systems. Pacific Sci. Rev. B Human. Soc. Sci. 2(2), 75–79 (2016)spa
dcterms.referencesTariq, M.I.: Providing assurance to cloud computing through ISO 27001 certification: how much cloud is secured after implementing information security standards (2015)spa
dcterms.referencesButt, S.A., Jamal, T.: Frequent change request from user to handle cost on project in agile model. Proc. Asia Pacific J. Multi. Res. 5(2), 26–42 (2017)spa
dc.source.urlhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-52190-5_27spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52190-5_27
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International