Show simple item record

dc.creatorCoronado-Hernandez, Jairo R.
dc.creatorRios-Angulo, Wilson A.
dc.creatorSegovia, Camilo
dc.creatorUrrego-Rubio, Diana C.
dc.creatorRomero-Conrado, Alfonso R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T17:20:30Z
dc.date.available2021-03-18T17:20:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.issn03029743
dc.identifier.issn16113349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/8046
dc.description.abstractBy 2025 the Republic of Colombia aims to be an advisory member of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) and the installation of a scientific station is necessary to upscale the scientific capabilities. The aim of this paper is showing the results of the implementation of a Fuzzy TOPSIS algorithm for site selection of the Colombian Antarctic Scientific Station. A three-phase methodology was AQ1 proposed, and the obtained results allowed to identify the optimum location for the station, considering key success factors and regulatory constraints.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.sourceLecture Notes in Computer Sciencespa
dc.subjectSite selectionspa
dc.subjectFuzzy TOPSISspa
dc.subjectAntarctic stationspa
dc.titleSite selection of the Colombian antarctic research station based on fuzzy-topsis algorithmspa
dc.typearticlespa
dcterms.references1. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)spa
dcterms.references2. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer, Heidelberg (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9spa
dcterms.references3. Sindhu, S., Nehra, V., Luthra, S.: Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: case study of India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 73, 496–511 (2017)spa
dcterms.references4. Perera, A.T.D., Nik, V.M., Mauree, D., Scartezzini, J.-L.: An integrated approach to design site specific distributed electrical hubs combining optimization, multi-criterion assessment and decision making. Energy 134, 103–120 (2017)spa
dcterms.references5. Zamri, N., Ahmad, F., Rose, A.N.M., Makhtar, M.: A fuzzy TOPSIS with Z-numbers approach for evaluation on accident at the construction site. In: Herawan, T., Ghazali, R., Nawi, N.M., Deris, M.M. (eds.) SCDM 2016. AISC, vol. 549, pp. 41–50. Springer, Cham (2017). https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51281-5_5spa
dcterms.references6. Bostanci, B., Bakir, N.Y., Doˇgan, U., Göngör, M.K.: Research on GIS-aided housing satisfaction using fuzzy decision-making techniques—Bulanik karar verme teknikleri ile CBS destekli konut memnuniyeti ara¸stirmasi. J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ. 32, 1193–1207 (2017)spa
dcterms.references7. Pahari, S., Ghosh, D., Pal, A.: An online review-based hotel selection process using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. In: Pattnaik, P.K., Rautaray, S.S., Das, H., Nayak, J. (eds.) Progress in Computing, Analytics and Networking. AISC, vol. 710, pp. 203–214. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7871-2_20spa
dcterms.references8. Wang, C.-N., Nguyen, V.T., Thai, H.T.N., Duong, D.H.: Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Viet Nam. Energies 11, 1504 (2018)spa
dcterms.references9. Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., Agouti, T.: An application of OLAP/GIS-Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS methodology for decision making: location selection for landfill of industrial wastes as a case study. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21, 2074–2084 (2017)spa
dcterms.references10. Polat, G., Eray, E., Bingol, B.N.: An integrated fuzzy MCGDM approach for supplier selection problem. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 23, 926–942 (2017)spa
dcterms.references11. Deveci, M., Canıtez, F., Göka¸sar, I.: WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station. Sustain. Cities Soc. 41, 777–791 (2018)spa
dcterms.references12. Trivedi, A., Singh, A.: Prioritizing emergency shelter areas using hybrid multi-criteria decision approach: a case study. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 24, 133–145 (2017)spa
dcterms.references13. Daneshvar Rouyendegh, B., Yildizbasi, A., Arikan, Ü.Z.B.: Using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS in site selection of wind power plants in Turkey. Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 14 (2018)spa
dcterms.references14. Darani, S.K., Eslami, A.A., Jabbari, M., Asefi, H.: Parking lot site selection using a fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework in Tuyserkan, Iran. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 144 (2018)spa
dcterms.references15. Noori, A., Bonakdari, H., Morovati, K., Gharabaghi, B.: The optimal dam site selection using a group decision-making method through fuzzy TOPSIS model. Environ. Syst. Decis. 38, 471–488 (2018)spa
dcterms.references16. Kutlu Gündoˇgdu, F., Kahraman, C.: A novel VIKOR method using spherical fuzzy sets and its application to warehouse site selection. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 37, 1197–1211 (2019)spa
dcterms.references17. Erba¸s, M., Kabak, M., Özceylan, E., Çetinkaya, C.: Optimal siting of electric vehicle charging stations: a GIS-based fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Energy 163, 1017–1031 (2018)spa
dcterms.references18. Wang, C.-N., Huang, Y.-F., Chai, Y.-C., Nguyen, V.T.: A Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for renewable energy plants location selection in Vietnam under a fuzzy environment. Appl. Sci. 8, 2069 (2018)spa
dcterms.references19. Mayaki, E.A., Adedipe, O., Lawal, S.A.: Multi-criteria evaluation of the appropriate offshore wind farm location in Nigeria. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2018)spa
dcterms.references20. Drakaki, M., Gören, H.G., Tzionas, P.: Comparison of fuzzy multi criteria decision making approaches in an intelligent multi-agent system for refugee siting. In: Swi˛ ´ atek, J., Borzemski, L., Wilimowska, Z. (eds.) ISAT 2018. AISC, vol. 853, pp. 361–370. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99996-8_33spa
dcterms.references21. Bakhtavar, E., Yousefi, S., Jafarpour, A.: Evaluation of shaft locations in underground mines: Fuzzy multiobjective optimization by ratio analysis with fuzzy cognitive map weights. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 119, 855–864 (2019)spa
dcterms.references22. Seker, S., Aydin, N.: Hydrogen production facility location selection for Black Sea using entropy based TOPSIS under IVPF environment. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 15855–15868 (2020)spa
dcterms.references23. Liang, X., Zhang, R., Liu, C.: Location analysis of regional disaster relief material reserve center: a case study in Sichuan Province, China. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 1588–1592 (2019)spa
dcterms.references24. Mohsin, M., Zhang, J., Saidur, R., Sun, H., Sait, S.M.: Economic assessment and ranking of wind power potential using fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 22494– 22511 (2019)spa
dcterms.references25. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C.: Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. J. Clean. Prod. 233, 13–22 (2019)spa
dcterms.references26. Yildiz, A., Ayyildiz, E., Taskin Gumus, A., Ozkan, C.: A modified balanced scorecard based hybrid pythagorean fuzzy AHP-topsis methodology for ATM site selection problem. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 19, 365–384 (2020)spa
dcterms.references27. Erdin, C., Akba¸s, H.E.: A comparative analysis of fuzzy TOPSIS and geographic information systems (GIS) for the location selection of shopping malls: a case study from Turkey. Sustainability 11, 3837 (2019)spa
dcterms.references28. Ortiz-Barrios, M., Nugent, C., Cleland, I., Donnelly, M., Verikas, A.: Selecting the most suitable classification algorithm for supporting assistive technology adoption for people with dementia: a multicriteria framework. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 27, 20–38 (2019)spa
dcterms.references29. León, O.P.: Logística Urbana desde la perspectiva del Agente Generador de Viajes. INGE CUC 15, 45–62 (2019)spa
dcterms.references30. Restrepo, J.E., Neira Rodado, D., Viloria Silva, A.: Multicriteria strategic approach for the selection of concrete suppliers in a construction company in Colombia. In: Saeed, K., Dvorský, J. (eds.) CISIM 2020. LNCS, vol. 12133, pp. 184–194. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-47679-3_16spa
dcterms.references31. Yava¸so˘glu, H.H., et al.: Site selection of the turkish antarctic research station using analytic hierarchy process. Polar Sci. 22, 1–12 (2019)spa
dcterms.references32. Pang, X., Liu, H., Zhao, X.: Selecting suitable sites for an Antarctic research station: a case for a new Chinese research station. Antarct. Sci. 26, 479–490 (2014)spa
dcterms.references33. Correa, M.: ¿A qué volvemos a la Antártida?. https://www.elcolombiano.com/colombia/exp edicion-a-la-antartida-que-es-LK7862836spa
dc.source.urlhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-53956-6_60spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53956-6_60
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal