Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorZielinski, Sewerynspa
dc.contributor.authorMilanés Batista, Celenespa
dc.contributor.authorCambon, Elenaspa
dc.contributor.authorPÉREZ MONTERO, OFELIAspa
dc.contributor.authorRizo, Lourdesspa
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Andresspa
dc.contributor.authorCuker, Benjaminspa
dc.contributor.authorAnfuso, Giorgiospa
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T20:57:45Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T20:57:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/8210spa
dc.description.abstractHuman activities often drive landscape degradation and the associated loss of value. This paper describes a method that, by integrating multiple factors, characterize landscape value to establish relevant and effective management practices. The new integrated method for landscape assessment (IMLA) is a four-step model that includes: (i) establishment of a general theoretical basis for sustainability relevant metrics; (ii) characterization of the landscape; (iii) landscape valuation; (iv) recommendations for landscape value management. Each step includes different interactive components of analysis. The new IMLA considers the potential range of values associated with each landscape unit and facilitates sustainable landscape management. The method is systematic and includes both inductive and deductive reasoning. Its articulation is represented in the conjunction and overlapping of all factors and variables considered. IMLA was tested in Santiago de Cuba Bay (Cuba) and used to determine five landscape scopes, eight first-order landscape units and 29 s-order units. It proved to be a useful tool to establish landscape values and sound management strategies. Application of IMLA in Cuba will help local authorities institute land-use plans and to establish decision-making processes that include valuation of cultural landscapes.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/spa
dc.sourceSustainabilityspa
dc.subjectLandscape unitsspa
dc.subjectCharacterization value managementspa
dc.subjectSustainabilityspa
dc.subjectScenariosspa
dc.subjectCoastal zonespa
dc.titleAn integrated method for landscape assessment: application to Santiago de Cuba Bay, Cubaspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.source.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4773spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su13094773spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.references1. Western, D.; Mose, V.N.; Maitumo, D.; Mburu, C. Long-term changes in the plant ecology of an African savanna landscape and the implications for ecosystem theory and conservation management. Ecol. Process. 2021, 10, 1–12.spa
dc.relation.references2. NC 93-06-101 SNPMA. Paisaje. Términos y Definiciones. Sistema de Normas para la Protección del Medio Ambiente; Comité Estatal de Normalización: La Habana, Cuba, 1987; p. 15.spa
dc.relation.references3. Quintela., J. El Inventario, el Análisis y el Diagnóstico Geo Ecológico de los Paisajes Mediante el Uso de los SIG. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba, 1995; p. 105.spa
dc.relation.references4. Aguiló, M. Guía para la Elaboración de Estudios del Medio Físico. Contenido y Metodología; Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Madrid, Spain, 1998; p. 484.spa
dc.relation.references5. Salinas, C.E. Análisis y Evaluación de los Paisajes en la Planificación Regional en Cuba. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Geografía, Universidad de La Habana , La Habana, Cuba,1991; p. 187.spa
dc.relation.references6. Salinas, E. Los Paisajes Como Fundamento del Ordenamiento Ambiental. Experiencias y Perspectivas; Convención Trópico: La Habana, Cuba, 2004.spa
dc.relation.references7. Pérez-Chacón, E. Unidades de Paisaje: Aproximación Científica y Aplicaciones, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006; p. 125.spa
dc.relation.references8. Warnock, S.; Griffiths, G. Landscape Characterisation: The Living Landscapes Approach in the UK. Landsc. Res. 2014, 40, 261–278.spa
dc.relation.references9. MMA–IGAC. Zonificación Ecológica de la Región Pacífico Colombiano; Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi: Santa Fé de Bogotá, Colombia, 2000; p. 365.spa
dc.relation.references10. Escribano, B.R. “Propuesta de una Metodología para la Integración de las Actuaciones forestales en el Paisaje”, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006; p. 174.spa
dc.relation.references11. Martínez, J.M.; Cárdenas, O.; Martín, G.; Olivera, J.; García, M. Guía Metodológica para los Estudios Técnicos de Ordenamiento Ambiental en Cuba; Ministerio de Ciencia Tecnología y Medio ambiente e Instituto de Geografía Tropical: La Habana, Cuba, 2009.spa
dc.relation.references12. Ulrich, R.S. Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landsc. Res. 1979, 4, 17–23, doi:10.1080/01426397908705892.spa
dc.relation.references13. Rodríguez, R. El Paisaje Urbano en el Centro Histórico de Santiago de Cuba: Método Gráfico Teórico para su Caracterización Morfotipológica. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Construcciones, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2008.spa
dc.relation.references14. Cambón, F.E.C. El paisaje de la Cuenca Visual de la Bahía de Santiago de Cuba. Procedimiento Metódico para su Caracterización y Valoración. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2001.spa
dc.relation.references15. Schmitz, S.; Vanderheyden, V. Reflexive loops on scaling issues in landscape quality assessment Serge Schmitz, Vincent Vanderheyden. Land Use Policy 2016, 53, 3–7.spa
dc.relation.references16. Steiner, F. The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning, 2nd ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1991.spa
dc.relation.references17. Scott, A. Assessing Public Perception of Landscape: The LANDMAP experience. Landsc. Res. 2002, 27, 271–295, doi:10.1080/01426390220149520.spa
dc.relation.references18. Cambón, F.E.C. Proceso de urbanización y paisaje en la cuenca de la bahía de Santiago de Cuba. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2011, XXXII, 3.spa
dc.relation.references19. Willemen, L.; Verburg, P.H.; Hein, L.; Van Mensvoort, M.E. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 88, 34–43, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.08.004.spa
dc.relation.references20. Mateo, R.J.M. Geoecología de los Paisajes. Apuntes Para un Curso de Postgrado; Universidad de los Andes: Mérida, Venezuela, 1991; p. 222.spa
dc.relation.references21. Mateo, R.J.M. Geografía de los Paisajes; Universitaria de La Habana: Havana, Cuba, 2008; p. 436.spa
dc.relation.references22. Olwig, K.R.; Dalglish, C.; Fairclough, G.; Herring, P.; Herring, P. Introduction to a special issue: The future of landscape characterisation, and the future character of landscape—between space, time, history, place and nature. Landsc. Res. 2016, 41, 1–6, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135321.spa
dc.relation.references23. Rojas, Á.; Ravelo, G. “Identificación de Valores en el Barrio de Colón”, en El Barrio de Colón; Pontón Caribe, S.A., Ed.; Rehabilitación Urbana y Desarrollo Comunitario en La Habana: La Habana, Cuba, 2005; p. 40.spa
dc.relation.references24. Martínez, P.E.; Ortega, C.N. (Eds.) Los Valores del Paisaje; Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2009; p. 322, ISBN 978-84-8344-151-0.spa
dc.relation.references25. Muñoz, M.D.; Pérez, L.; Sanhueza, R.; Rovira, A.; Urrutia, R. Los paisajes del agua en la cuenca del río Baker: Bases conceptuales para su valoracion integral. Rev. Geogr. Norte Grande 2006, 36, 31–48.spa
dc.relation.references26. Nogué, J.; Sala, P. “El Paisaje en la Ordenación del Territorio. Los Catálogos de Paisaje de Cataluña”, en Cuadernos Geográficos; University of Granada: Granada, Spain 2008; pp. 69–98.spa
dc.relation.references27. Mateu, J.F. “La Valoración Científica del Paisaje: Luis Pardo y los Lagos de España”. en Los valores del Paisaje; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2009; pp. 155–161.spa
dc.relation.references28. Recharte, J. “La categoría de Reserva Paisajística como Estrategia de Conservación en el Contexto de Los Andes: Naturaleza y Cultura en la cordillera de Huayhuash, Perú”, en Paisajes Culturales en Los Andes; Reunión de Expertos, UNESCO: Lima, Perú, 1998; pp. 131–140.spa
dc.relation.references29. Pizano, O.; Cortés, R. “Paisajes Culturales, Territorio y Cultura en la Cordillera de Los Andes”, en Paisajes Culturales en Los Andes, Reunión de Expertos, UNESCO: Lima, Perú, 1998; pp. 59–68.spa
dc.relation.references30. Pinto-Correia, T.; Machado, C.; Barroso, F.; Picchi, P.; Turpin, N.; Bousset, J.-P.; Chabab, N.; Michelin, Y. How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 32, 37–47, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.01.016.spa
dc.relation.references31. Brandt, J.; Tress, B.; Tress, G. (Eds.) Conference Material for the Conference on “Multifunctional Landscapes”; Centre for Landscape Research, University of Roskilde: Roskilde, Denmark, 2000.spa
dc.relation.references32. Palmer, J.F.; Hoffman, R.E. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 149–161, doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00133-5.spa
dc.relation.references33. Tveit, M.; Ode, Å.; Fry, G. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 229–255, doi:10.1080/01426390600783269.spa
dc.relation.references34. Carvalho-Ribeiro, S.; Loupa Ramos, I.; Madeira, L.; Barroso, F.; Menezes, H.; Pinto Correia, T. Is land cover an important asset for addressing the subjective landscape dimension. Land Use Policy 2013, 35, 50–60.spa
dc.relation.references35. Fairclough, G.J. Historic Landscape Characterisation: The State of the Art; English Heritage: London, UK, 1999.spa
dc.relation.references36. Turner, S. Historic Landscape Characterization: A landscape archaeology for research, management and planning. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 385–398.spa
dc.relation.references37. Zube, E.H. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landsc. Ecol. 1987, 1, 37–45, doi:10.1007/bf02275264.spa
dc.relation.references38. Mücher, C.A.; Klijn, J.A.; Wascher, D.M.; Schaminée, J.H. A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10, 87–103, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018.spa
dc.relation.references39. Atik, M.; Işıklı, R.C.; Ortaçeşme, V.; Yıldırım, E. Exploring a combination of objective and subjective assessment in landscape classification: Side case from Turkey. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 83, 130–140.spa
dc.relation.references40. Allain, S.; Plumecocq, G.; Leenhardt, D. How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 136, 282–295, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.011.spa
dc.relation.references41. Brabyn, L. Classifying Landscape Character. Landsc. Res. 2009, 34, 299–321, doi:10.1080/01426390802371202.spa
dc.relation.references42. Venegas, C.; Rodríguez, J. “Valoración de los Paisajes Monumentales. Una Propuesta Metodológica para la Integración Paisajística de los Conjuntos Históricos”, en Paisaje y Ordenación del Territorio; Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes: Sevilla, Spain, 2006.spa
dc.relation.references43. Daniel, T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 267–281, doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00141-4.spa
dc.relation.references44. Mooser, A.; Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.T.; Molina, R.; Aucelli, P.P.C. An Innovative Approach to Determine Coastal Scenic Beauty and Sensitivity in a Scenario of Increasing Human Pressure and Natural Impacts Due to Climate Change. Water 2020, 13, 49, doi:10.3390/w13010049.spa
dc.relation.references45. Butler, A. Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: The hidden dominance of the objective outsider. Landsc. Res. 2016, 41, 239–252, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135315.spa
dc.relation.references46. Rafael Calduch Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación Internacional. Madrid, 1998 (Revised and Updated version. Madrid, 2014. Available online: https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/835-2018-03-01-Metodos%20y%20Tecnicas%20de%20Investigacion%20Internacional%20v2.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2020).spa
dc.relation.references47. Salomón, B.R.D. Metodología de la Investigación; McGraw-Hill Interamericana: NewYork, NY, USA: 2014; p. 92, ISBN 978-1-4562-2396-0 ISBN: 978-607-15-0291-9spa
dc.relation.references48. Stephenson, J. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 84, 127–139, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003.spa
dc.relation.references49. Birnbaum, C. Protecting Cultural Landscapes. Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes; National Parks Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; Preservation Brief 36.spa
dc.relation.references50. Martorell Carreño, Alberto: “Paisajes e Itinerarios Culturales: Conceptos Independientes que Enriquecen la Práctica de la Conservación Cultural”. Available online: http://www.esicomos.org/Nueva_carpeta/TCSM/ponencia_AMARTORELL.htm (accessed on 10 April 2010).spa
dc.relation.references51. Pintó i Fosalba, J. El Paisaje de la Viña. Valor Cultural y Ambiental”, en Revista de Enología. 2015. Available online: http://www.acenologia.com/ciencia95_1.htm (accessed on12 July 2020).spa
dc.relation.references52. Cantasano, N.; Caloiero, T.; Pellicone, G.; Aristodemo, F.; De Marco, A.; Tagarelli, G. Can ICZM Contribute to the Mitigation of Erosion and of Human Activities Threatening the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Coastal Landscape of Calabria? Sustainability 2021, 13, 1122, doi:10.3390/su13031122.spa
dc.relation.references53. Guirado Romero, José: “El Parque Natural Marítimo- Terrestre de Cabo de Gata-Níjar, un Espacio Excepcional”. Available online: http://ww.juntadeandalucia.es/cultura/iaph/infopha/05textose/boletin37.html (accessed on10 June 2020).spa
dc.relation.references54. Karrasch, L.; Maier, M.; Kleyer, M.; Klenke, T. Collaborative Landscape Planning: Co-Design of Ecosystem-Based Land Management Scenarios. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1668, doi:10.3390/su9091668.spa
dc.relation.references55. ICOMOS. Viena Memorandun on “World Heritege and Contemporary Architecture—Managing the Historic Urban Landscape”; ICOMOS: Vienna, Austria 2005.spa
dc.relation.references56. UNESCO. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. 2005. Available online: http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines (accessed on 10 May 2020).spa
dc.relation.references57. Mata, O.R.; Sanz, H.C. Atlas de los Paisajes de España; Ministerio de Medio Ambiente: Ambiente, Spain, 2003.spa
dc.relation.references58. Ostle, B. Statistics in Research: Basic Concepts and Techniques for Research Workers; Literary Licensing: New York, NY, USA. 2012; p. 500, ISBN-10: 1258401649, ISBN-13: 978-1258401641.spa
dc.relation.references59. Campos, G.C.; Lule, M.N. La observación, un método para el estudio de la realidad. Rev. Xihmai 2012, VII, 45–60.spa
dc.relation.references60. Milanés, B.C.; Pacheco, A. Asentamientos costeros en la bahía de Santiago de Cuba: Estudio de su vulnerabilidad urbana. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2011, XXXII, 18–26. Available online: http://es.scribd.com/doc/86054921/Revista-Arquitectura-y-Urbanismo-3-2011 (accessed on 10 April 2020).spa
dc.relation.references61. Milanés, B.C. Método Integrado Para Demarcar y Delimitar las Zonas Costeras (DOMIZC): Estudio del Caso de Santiago de Cuba. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2014; p. 300, doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1800.4086.spa
dc.relation.references62. Botero, C. M.; Arrizabalaga, M.; Milanés, C. & Vivas, O. Indicadores de gobernabilidad para la gestión del riesgo costero en Colombia. Rev. Luna Azul, 2017. 45, 227-251. doi: 10.17151/luaz.2017.45.12spa
dc.relation.references63. DPPF. Conjunto de Bases Cartográficas de la Provincia Santiago de Cuba; DPPF: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba 2010; p. 78.spa
dc.relation.references64. Cambón, F.E.C. Las múltiples miradas de la relación paisajística de Santiago con su bahía. Rev. Arquit. Urban. 2008, XXIX, 1.spa
dc.relation.references65. Milanés, B.C. Unidades costeras ambientales para el manejo en Santiago de Cuba: Delimitación y prioridades de actuación. Rev. Arquitect. Urban. 2012, XXXIII, 83–97.spa
dc.relation.references66. Batista, CM.; Suárez, A.; Saltarén, C.M.B. Novel method to delimitate and demarcate coastal zone boundaries. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 144, 105–119, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.04.021.spa
dc.relation.references67. Countryside Commission. Assessment and Conservation of Landscape Character: The Warwickshire Landscapes Project Approach; Countryside Commission: Cheltenham, UK, 1991.spa
dc.relation.references68. Ministerio de Cultura. Ley No 2 de Monumentos de la República de Cuba. Protección del Patrimonio Cultural; Compilación de textos legislativos, Ed.; Consejo Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Ministerio de Cultura: La Habana, Cuba 2002; p. 31.spa
dc.relation.references69. Ministerio de Cultura. Decreto No. 55. Reglamento Para la Ejecución de la Ley de los Monumentos Nacionales y Locales; Compilación de textos legislativos, Ed.; Consejo Nacional de Patrimonio Cultural, Ministerio de Cultura: La Habana, Cuba 2002; p. 67.spa
dc.relation.references70. Milanes, C.B; Pereira, C.I.; Botero, C.M. Improving a decree law about coastal zone management in a small island developing state: The case of Cuba. Mar. Policy 2019, 101, 93–107, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.030.spa
dc.relation.references71. Pereira, C.I.; Carvajal, A.F.; Milanés, B.C.; Botero, C.M. Regulating human interventions in Colombian coastal areas: Implications for the environmental licensing procedure in middle-income countries. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2019, 79, 106284, doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106284.spa
dc.relation.references72. Milanes, B.C.M.; Planas, J.A.; Pelot, R.; Núñez, J.R. A new methodology incorporating public participation within Cuba’s ICZM program. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 186, 105101, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105101.spa
dc.relation.references73. DPPF. Plan General de Ordenamiento Urbano de la ciudad de Santiago de Cuba; DPPF: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba. 2015; 134p.spa
dc.relation.references74. Pérez, M.O.; Milanes, B.C. Social perception of coastal risk in the face of hurricanes in the southeastern region of Cuba. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2020, 184, 105010, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105010.spa
dc.relation.references75. Marcos, L.S.O.; Tutikian, B.; Milanes, C.; Silva, F.O. Atmospheric contaminations and bad conservation effects in Roman mosaics and mortars of Italica. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119250, doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119250.spa
dc.relation.references76. Silva, L.F.O.; Milanés, C.; Pinto, D.; Ramirez, O.; Lima, B.D. Multiple hazardous elements in nanoparticulate matter from a Caribbean industrialized atmosphere. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124776, doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124776.spa
dc.relation.references77. Chris, D.; Alan, L. A question of what matters: Landscape characterisation as a process of situated, problem-orientated public discourse. Landsc. Res. 2016, doi:10.1080/01426397.2015.1135319.spa
dc.relation.references78. Milder, J.C., L.E. Buck, F.A.J DeClerck, and S.J. Scherr. Landscape approaches to achieving food production, natural resource conservation, and the millennium development goals. Integr. Ecol. Poverty Reduct. , 2012. 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4419-0633-5_5spa
dc.relation.references79. Council of Europe. European Landscape Convention. 2000. Available online: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/176.htm (accessed on 21 December 2014).spa
dc.relation.references80. Cosgrove, D. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape; Croom Helm: London, UK, 1984.spa
dc.relation.references81. Cosgrove, D. The Palladian Landscape: Geographical Change and its Cultural Representations in Sixteenth-Century; The Pennsylvania State University Press: Elkins Park, PA, USA, 1993.spa
dc.relation.references82. Martín, B.; Ortega, E.O.; Arce, R.M. Landscape character assessment with GIS using map-based indicators and photographs in the relationship between landscape and roads. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 180, 324–34, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.044.spa
dc.relation.references83. Brown, G.; Brabyn, L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107, 317–331, doi10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.007.spa
dc.relation.references84. Meeus, J.H.A.; Wijermans, M.P.; Vroom, M.J. Agricultural landscapes in Europe and their transformation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1990, 18, 289–352, doi.:10.1016/0169-2046(90)90016-U.spa
dc.relation.references85. Alessa, L.; Kliskey, A.; Brown, G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled socialecological space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 85, 27–39, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.spa
dc.relation.references86. Juntti, M.; Lundy, L. A mixed methods approach to urban ecosystem services: Experienced environmental quality and its role in ecosystem assessment within an inner-city estate. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017, 161, 10–21, doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.002.spa
dc.relation.references87. Bastian, O.; Krönert, R.; Lipský, Z. Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—A challenge for landscape planning. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21, 359–374.spa
dc.relation.references88. Termorshuizen, J.W.; Opdam, P.; Van den Brink, A. Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79, 374–384.spa
dc.relation.references89. Koschke, L.; Fürst, C.; Frank, S.; Makeschin, F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21, 54–66.spa
dc.relation.references90. Mann, C.; Garcia-Martin, M.; Raymond, C.M.; Shaw, B.J.; Plieninger, T. The potential for integrated landscape management to fulfil Europe’s commitments to the Sustainable Development Goals. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2018, 177, 75–82.spa
dc.relation.references91. Jones, K.B.; Zurlini, G.; Kienast, F.; Petrosillo, I.; Edwards, T.; Wade, T.G.; Zaccarelli, N. Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 1175–1192.spa
dc.relation.references92. Turner, M.G.; Crow, T.R.; Liu, J.; Rabe, D.; Rabeni, C.F.; Soranno, P.A.; Taylor, W.W.; Vogt, K.A.; Wiens, J.A. Bridging the gap between landscape ecology and nature resource management. In Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management; Liu, J., Taylor, W.W., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 433–460.spa
dc.relation.references93. Milanés, C.B.; Pérez, M.O.; Szlafsztein, C.F.; Pimentel, M.A.S. Climate change and spatial justice in coastal planning inCuba and Brazil. Ambiente Soc. 2020, 23, e01841, doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190184r1vu2020l6td.spa
dc.relation.references94. Kalinauskas, M.; Mikša, K.; Inácio, M.; Gomes, E.; Pereira, P. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 286, 112239.spa
dc.relation.references95. Hermes, J.; Albert, C.; Von Haaren, C. Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 296– 307, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015.spa
dc.relation.references96. Hermes, J.; Van Berkel, D.; Burkhard, B.; Plieninger, T.; Fagerholm, N.; Von Haaren, C.; Albert, C. Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2018, 31, 289–295, doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011.spa
dc.relation.references97. Durán, R.; Farizo, B.A.; Rodríguez, M.X. Conservation of maritime cultural heritahe: A discrete choice experiment in European Atlantic Region. Mar. Policy 2015, 51, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.023.spa
dc.relation.references98. Bauer, N.; Wallner, A.; Hunziker, M. The change of European landscapes: Humannature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2910–2920.spa
dc.relation.references99. Batista, M.C. Coastal flood hazard mapping. In Encyclopedia of Coastal Science, 2nd ed.; Finkl, C.W., Makowski, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 471–479, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48657-4_356-1.spa
dc.relation.references100. Batista, M.C. Coastal risk. In Encyclopedia of Coastal Science, 2nd ed.; Finkl, C.W., Makowski, C., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 524–534. Available online: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319- 48657-4_408-1 (accessed on 28 April 2020).spa
dc.relation.references101. Botero, C.M.; Pereira, C.I.; Milanes, C.B.; Pranzini, E. Dataset of human interventions as anthropogenic perturbations on the Caribbean coast of Colombia. Data Brief 2020, 31, 105847, doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105847.spa
dc.relation.references102. Kalivoda, O.; Vojar, J.; Skřivanová, Z.; Zahradník, D. Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 36–44, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009.spa
dc.relation.references103. Bürgi, M.; Ali, P.; Chowdhury, A.; Heinimann, A.; Hett, C.; Kienast, F.; Mondal, M.K.; Upreti, B.R.; Verburg, P.H. Integrated Landscape Approach: Closing the Gap between Theory and Application. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1371, doi:10.3390/su9081371.spa
dc.relation.references104. Rodella, I.; Madau, F.A.; Carboni, D. The Willingness to Pay for Beach Scenery and Its Preservation in Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1604, doi:10.3390/su12041604.spa
dc.relation.references105. UNESCO. Cultural Heritage Protection Act. 1999. Available online: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/slov_cultural_heritage_protection_act_engtof.pdf (accessed on25 June 2020).spa
dc.relation.references106. Blanco, B.R. El sitio histórico Castillo del Morro San Pedro de La Roca en Santiago de Cuba: Exponente de la arquitectura hispánica. Batey Rev. Cubana Antropol. Sociocult. 2013, 5, 184–196; ISSN 2225-529X.spa
dc.relation.references107. Márquez, G.A.; Ortiz, P.B. Proyecto de Rehabilitación Integral de cayo Granma y su Entorno Ciencia en su PC, núm. 2; Centro de Información y Gestión Tecnológica de Santiago de Cuba: Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, 2005; ISSN 1027-2887.spa
dc.relation.references108. Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.; Hernández, J.C.; Pranzini, E. Coastal scenic assessment and tourism management in western Cuba. Tour. Manag. 2014, 42, 307–320, doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.001.spa
dc.relation.references109. Anfuso, G.; Williams, A.T.; Casas, G.M.; Botero, C.M. ; Cabrera , J.A.; Pranzini, E. Evaluation of the scenic value of 100 beaches in Cuba: Implications for coastal tourism management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2017, 142, 173–185, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.029.spa
dc.relation.references110. Danielle, K. Enfoque del Paisaje Sostenible. Guía de Implementación. Paisajes Sostenibles, División de Finanzas Conservación Internacional. 2018. p. 25. Available online: https://www.conservation.org/docs/default-source/publication-pdfs/ci_lafsustainable-landscape-approach-implementation-guidebook-spanish.pdf?Status=Master&sfvrsn=56da1801_2 (accessed on 19 April 2021).spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3156]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC0 1.0 Universal
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC0 1.0 Universal