Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorClemente-Suárez, Vicente Javierspa
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Jiménez, Eduardospa
dc.contributor.authorRuisoto, Pablospa
dc.contributor.authorDalamitros, Athanasiosspa
dc.contributor.authorBeltrán Velasco, Ana Isabelspa
dc.contributor.authorHormeno-Holgado, Alberto Joaquinspa
dc.contributor.authorLaborde Cardenas, Carmen Ceciliaspa
dc.contributor.authorTornero Aguilera, José Franciscospa
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-24T14:42:35Z
dc.date.available2021-06-24T14:42:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-14
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601spa
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/8407spa
dc.description.abstractThe actual coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to the limit of emergency systems worldwide, leading to the collapse of health systems, police, first responders, as well as other areas. Various ways of dealing with this world crisis have been proposed from many aspects, with fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis being a method that can be applied to a wide range of emergency systems and professional groups, aiming to confront several associated issues and challenges. The purpose of this critical review was to discuss the basic principles, present current applications during the first pandemic wave, and propose future implications of this methodology. For this purpose, both primary sources, such as scientific articles, and secondary ones, such as bibliographic indexes, web pages, and databases, were used. The main search engines were PubMed, SciELO, and Google Scholar. The method was a systematic literature review of the available literature regarding the performance of the fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis of emergency systems in the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study highlight the importance of the fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis method as a beneficial tool for healthcare workers and first responders’ emergency professionals to face this pandemic as well as to manage the created uncertainty and its related risks.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/spa
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthspa
dc.subjectFuzzy decision analysisspa
dc.subjectDecision makingspa
dc.subjectUncertaintyspa
dc.subjectMulti-criteriaspa
dc.subjectEmergencyspa
dc.subjectCOVID-19spa
dc.titlePerformance of fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis of emergency system in COVID-19 pandemic. An extensive narrative reviewspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.source.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5208/htmspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105208spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.references1. Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Dalamitros, A.A.; Beltran-Velasco, A.I.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Social and psychophysiological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic: An extensive literature review. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 580225. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references2. Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Hormeño-Holgado, A.; Jiménez, M.; Benitez-Agudelo, J.C.; Navarro-Jiménez, E.; Perez-Palencia, N.; Maestre-Serrano, R.; Laborde-Cárdenas, C.C.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Dynamics of population immunity due to the herd effect in the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines 2020, 8, 236. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references3. Solis, J.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Henao-Martínez, A.F.; Krsak, M.; Zimmer, S.M. Structural vulnerability in the US revealed in three waves of COVID-19. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hig. 2020, 103, 25–27. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references4. Conti, P.; Caraffa, A.; Gallenga, C.E.; Kritas, S.K.; Frydas, I.; Younes, A.; Di Emidio, P.; Tetè, G.; Pregliasco, F.; Ronconi, G. The British variant of the new coronavirus-19 (Sars-Cov-2) should not create a vaccine problem. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2021, 35, 1–4.spa
dc.relation.references5. Siu, G.K.-H.; Lee, L.-K.; Leung, K.S.-S.; Leung, J.S.-L.; Ng, T.T.-L.; Chan, C.T.-M.; Tam, K.K.-G.; Lao, H.-Y.; Wu, A.K.-L.; Yau, M.C.-Y.; et al. Will a new clade of SARS-CoV-2 imported into the community spark a fourth wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong? Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 2497–2500. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.references6. Tsang, H.F.; Chan, L.W.C.; Cho, W.C.S.; Yu, A.C.S.; Yim, A.K.Y.; Chan, A.K.C.; Wong, S.C.C. An Update on COVID-19 Pandemic: The Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment Strategies. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2021, 29, 1–12. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references7. Pamuˇcar, D.; Žižovi´c, M.; Marinkovi´c, D.; Doljanica, D.; Jovanovi´c, S.V.; Brzakovi´c, P. Development of a multi-criteria model for sustainable reorganization of a healthcare system in an emergency situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7504. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references8. Yildirim, F.S.; Sayan, M.; Sanlidag, T.; Uzun, B.; Ozsahin, D.U.; Ozsahin, I. Comparative evaluation of the treatment of COVID-19 with multicriteria decision-making techniques. J. Healthc. Eng. 2021, 2021, 8864522. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references9. Abdullah, L. Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making and its Applications: A Brief Review of Category. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 97, 131–136. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references10. Carlsson, C.; Fullér, R. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments. Fuzzy Set Syst. 1996, 78, 139–153. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references11. Vakaramoko Diaby, V.; Goeree, R. How to use multi-criteria decision analysis methods for reimbursement decision-making in healthcare: A step-by-step guide. Expert Rev. Pharm. Outcomes Res. 2014, 14, 81–99.spa
dc.relation.references12. Saaty, R.W. The Analytic Hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Math. Model. 1987, 9, 161–176. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references13. Rezaei, J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 2015, 53, 49–57. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references14. Rezaei, J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega 2016, 64, 126–130. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references15. Liang, F.; Brunelli, M.; Rezaei, J. Consistency issues in the Best Worst Method: Measurements and thresholds. Omega 2020, 96, 102175. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references16. Faizi, S.; Sałabun, W.; Nawaz, S. Best-Worst method and Hamacher aggregation operations for intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 115088, in press. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references17. Hosseini, S.M.; Bahadori, M.; Raadabadi, M.; Ravangard, R. Ranking hospitals based on the disasters preparedness using the TOPSIS technique in western Iran. Hosp. Top. 2019, 97, 23–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.references18. Ortiz-Barrios, M.A.; Aleman-Romero, B.A.; Rebolledo-Rudas, J.; Maldonado-Mestre, H.; Montes-Villa, L.; De Felice, F.; Petrillo, A. The analytic decision-making preference model to evaluate the disaster readiness in emergency departments: The ADT model. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 2017, 24, 204–226. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references19. Sarkar, S. COVID-19 Susceptibility Mapping Using Multicriteria Evaluation. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2020, 14, 521–537. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references20. Sangiorgio, V.; Parisi, P. A multicriteria approach for risk assessment of Covid-19 in urban district lockdown. Saf. Sci. 2020, 130, 104862. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references21. Dijkman, J.G.; van Haeringen, H.; de Lange, S.J. Fuzzy numbers. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1983, 92, 301–341. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references22. Kiker, G.A.; Bridges, T.S.; Varghese, A.; Seager, T.P.; Linkov, I. Application of multicriteria decision anal-ysis in environmental decision making. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. Int. J. 2005, 1, 95–108. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references23. Singh, H.; Gupta, M.M.; Meitzler, T.; Hou, Z.-G.; Garg, K.K.; Solo, A.M.G.; Zadeh, L.A. Real-Life Applications of Fuzzy Logic. Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 2013, 581879, 1–3. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references24. Kahraman, C. (Ed.) Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; Volume 16.spa
dc.relation.references25. Guo, S.; Zhao, H. Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl. Based Syst. 2017, 121, 23–31. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references26. Tischler, G.L. Decision-making process in the emergency room. Archives Gen. Psychiatry 1966, 14, 69–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.references27. Sharma, M.K.; Dhiman, N.; Mishra, V.N. Mediative fuzzy logic mathematical model: A contradictory management prediction in COVID-19 pandemic. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 105, 107285. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references28. Dhiman, N.; Sharma, M.K. Mediative Sugeno’s-TSK fuzzy logic based screening analysis to diagnosis of heart disease. Appl. Math. 2019, 10, 448–467. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references29. Shaban, W.M.; Rabie, A.H.; Saleh, A.I.; Abo-Elsoud, M.A. Detecting COVID-19 patients based on fuzzy inference engine and Deep Neural Network. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 99, 106906. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references30. Ozturk, T.; Talo, M.; Yildirim, E.A.; Baloglu, U.B.; Yildirim, O.; Rajendra Acharya, U. Automated detection of COVID-19 cases using deep neural networks with X-ray images. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020, 121, 103792. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.references31. Pirouz, B.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Shaffiee Haghshenas, S.; Piro, P. Investigating a serious challenge in the sustainable development process: Analysis of confirmed cases of COVID-19 (new type of Coronavirus) through a binary classification using artificial intelligence and regression analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2427. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references32. Sethy, P.K.; Behera, S.K. Detection of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Based on Deep Features. Preprints 2020, 2020030300. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references33. Xu, X.; Jiang, X.; Ma, C.; Du, P.; Li, X.; Lv, S.; Li, L. A deep learning system to screen novel Coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia. Eng. Beijing China 2020, 6, 1122–1129. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references34. Wang, J.-J.; Jing, Y.-Y.; Zhang, C.-F.; Zhao, J.-H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decisionmaking. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 2263–2278. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references35. Batur Sir, G.D.; Sir, E. Pain Treatment Evaluation in COVID-19 Patients with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multicriteria DecisionMaking. J. Healthc. Eng. 2021, 8831114, 1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.references36. Fu, Y.-L.; Liang, K.-C. Fuzzy logic programming and adaptable design of medical products for the COVID-19 anti-epidemic normalization. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 197, 105762. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references37. Palouj, M.; Lavaei Adaryani, R.; Alambeigi, A.; Movarej, M.; Safi Sis, Y. Surveying the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the poultry supply chain: A mixed methods study. Food Control 2021, 126, 108084. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.references38. Oliveira, J.F.; Jorge, D.C.; Veiga, R.V.; Rodrigues, M.S.; Torquato, M.F.; Silva, N.B.; Andrade, R.F. Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 in 14. 8 million individuals in Bahia, Brazil. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–13. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references39. Caetano, M.A.L. Can Catastrophe Theory Explain Expansion and Contagious of Covid-19? medRxiv 2021. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references40. Crítica y Unidades Coronarias; Semicyuc.org Website. Recomendaciones Éticas Para La Toma De Decisiones En La Situación Excepcional De Crisis Por Pandemia Covid-19 En Las Unidades De Cuidados Intensivos. (SEMICYUC). Semicyuc.org Website. Available online: https://semicyuc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/%C3%89tica_SEMICYUC-COVID-19.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2021).spa
dc.relation.references41. Madrid’s New COVID-19 Hospital Faces Backlash. Cgtn.com Website. Available online: https://newseu.cgtn.com/news/2020-1 2-03/Madrid-s-new-COVID-19-hospital-faces-backlash-VU85oyZLxe/index.html (accessed on 20 April 2021).spa
dc.relation.references42. Alzamora, B.; Barros, R.T.V. Analysis and financial sustainability of MSW management in Belo Horizonte (Brazil). Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag. 2022, in press. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references43. Depuydt, P.; Guidet, B. Triage policy of severe Covid-19 patients: What to do now? Ann. Intensive Care 2021, 11, 18. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references44. Vujanovic, A.A.; Lebeaut, A.; Leonard, S. Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of first responders. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 2021, 1–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]spa
dc.relation.references45. Zolnikov, T.R.; Furio, F. Stigma on first responders during COVID-19. Stigma Health 2020, 5, 375–379. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references46. De Kock, J.H.; Latham, H.A.; Leslie, S.J.; Grindle, M.; Munoz, S.-A.; Ellis, L.; O’Malley, C.M. A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: Implications for supporting psychological well-being. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 104. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references47. Xiong, J.; Lipsitz, O.; Nasri, F.; Lui, L.M.W.; Gill, H.; Phan, L.; McIntyre, R.S. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 277, 55–64. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references48. Lebrasseur, A.; Fortin-Bédard, N.; Lettre, J.; Bussières, E.-L.; Best, K.; Boucher, N.; Routhier, F. Impact of COVID-19 on people with physical disabilities: A rapid review. Disabil. Health J. 2021, 14, 101014. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references49. Li, W.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.-H.; Zhao, Y.-J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, Y.-T. Progression of mental health services during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1732–1738. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references50. Taquet, M.; Luciano, S.; Geddes, J.R.; Harrison, P.J. Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: Retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry 2021, 8, 130–140. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references51. Giorgi, G.; Lecca, L.I.; Alessio, F.; Finstad, G.L.; Bondanini, G.; Lulli, L.G.; Mucci, N. COVID-19-related mental health effects in the workplace: A narrative review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7857. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references52. McKnight-Eily, L.R.; Okoro, C.A.; Strine, T.W.; Verlenden, J.; Hollis, N.D.; Njai, R.; Thomas, C. Racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of stress and worry, mental health conditions, and increased substance use among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, April and May 2020. Mmwr. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 162–166. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references53. Alcover, C.-M.; Salgado, S.; Nazar, G.; Ramírez-Vielma, R.; González-Suhr, C. Job Insecurity, Financial Threat and Mental Health in the COVID-19 Context: The Buffer Role of Perceived Social Support. MedRxiv 2020. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references54. Cengiz, K.; Onar, S.C.; Oztaysi, B. Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: A literature review. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2015, 8, 637–666.spa
dc.relation.references55. Matarazzo, G.; Fernandes, A.; Alcadipani, R. Police institutions in the face of the pandemic: Sensemaking, leadership, and discretion. Rev. Adm. Pública 2020, 54, 898–908.spa
dc.relation.references56. Kofman, Y.B.; Garfin, D.R. Home is not always a haven: The domestic violence crisis amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 2020, 12, S199–S201. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references57. Jennings, W.G.; Perez, N.M. The immediate impact of COVID-19 on law enforcement in the United States. Am. J. Crim. Justice Ajcj 2020, 45, 1–12. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references58. Bonkiewicz, L.; Ruback, R.B. The role of the police in evacuations: Responding to the social impact of a disaster. Police Q. 2012, 15, 137–156. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references59. Shortland, N.; Thompson, L.; Alison, L. Police perfection: Examining the effect of trait maximization on police decision-making. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1817. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references60. Sánchez-Lozano, J.M.; Serna, J.; Dolón-Payán, A. Evaluating military training aircrafts through the combination of multi-criteria decision-making processes with fuzzy logic. A case study in the Spanish Air Force Academy. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2015, 42, 58–65. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references61. Yilmaz, B.Ö.; Tozan, H.; Karadayi, M.A. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Applications in Military Healthcare Field. J. Health Syst. Policies 2020, 2, 149–181.spa
dc.relation.references62. Karadayi, M.A.; Ekinci, Y.; Tozan, H. A fuzzy MCDM framework for weapon systems selection. In Operations Research for Military Organizations; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 185–204.spa
dc.relation.references63. Pearce, A.P.; Naumann, D.N.; O’Reilly, D. Mission command: Applying principles of military leadership to the SARSCov-2 (covid-19) crisis. BMJ Mil Health 2021, 167, 3–4. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references64. Karsak, E.E.; Ethem Tolga, E. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2001, 69, 49–64. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references65. Dalalah, D.; Hayajneh, M.; Batieha, F. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 8384–8391. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references66. Chang, T.; Wang, T. Using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management. Inf. Sci. 2009, 179, 355–370. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references67. Chou, T.-Y.; Chou, S.-C.T.; Tzeng, G.-H. Evaluating IT/IS investments: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 173, 1026–1046. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references68. Wang, C.-N.; Yang, C.-Y.; Cheng, H.-C. A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model for sustainable supplier evaluation and selection based on triple bottom line approaches in the garment industry. Processes 2019, 7, 400. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references69. Kaya, ˙I.; Çolak, M.; Terzi, F. A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019, 24, 207–228. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references70. Khemiri, R.; Elbedoui-Maktouf, K.; Grabot, B.; Zouari, B. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement–production planning. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 5305–5329. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references71. Soto-Baño, M.A.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J. Psicología de emergencias en España: Delimitación conceptual, ámbitos de actuación y propuesta de un sistema asistencial. Papeles del Psicól 2021, 42, 56–66.spa
dc.relation.references72. Soto-Baño, M.A.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J. Psicología de emergencias en España: Análisis actual, normativa y proposición reguladora. Papeles del Psicól 2021, 42, 46–55.spa
dc.relation.references73. Yao, S. Fuzzy-based multi-criteria decision analysis of environmental regulation and green economic efficiency in a post-COVID-19 scenario: The case of China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 1–27. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references74. Majumder, P.; Biswas, P.; Majumder, S. Application of new TOPSIS approach to identify the most significant risk factor and continuous monitoring of death of COVID-19. Electron. J. Gen. Med. 2020, 17, em234. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references75. Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Navarro-Jiménez, E.; Jimenez, M.; Hormeño-Holgado, A.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.B.; Benitez-Agudelo, J.C.; Perez-Palencia, N.; Laborde-Cárdenas, C.C.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic in Public Mental Health: An Extensive Narrative Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3221. [CrossRef]spa
dc.relation.references76. Rodriguez-Besteiro, S.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F.; Fernández-Lucas, J.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J. Gender Differences in the COVID-19 Pandemic Risk Perception, Psychology, and Behaviors of Spanish University Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3908. [CrossRef]spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3154]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC0 1.0 Universal
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC0 1.0 Universal