Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBlanco-Torres, Argelinaspa
dc.contributor.authorDuré, Marta I.spa
dc.contributor.authorArgenis Bonilla, Maríaspa
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T15:16:57Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T15:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0001-3765spa
dc.identifier.issn1678-2690spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/8716spa
dc.description.abstractStudies on the exploitation of trophic resources allow to establish interactions between predators and predator-prey, and this dynamic can present fl uctuations over time and space. We analysed stomach contents of 19 anuran species from tropical dry forests of Colombia, quantifi ed the overlap between species and identifi ed anuran trophic guilds. Most of the species were generalists in diet (89.5%), some with strong prey dominance and only two species were classifi ed as specialists. Two anurans guilds were identifi ed according to diet structure and habitat use: “ground foraging anurans, consuming Formicidae and Isoptera” and “arboreal ‘sit-and-wait’ predators, primarily consuming arachnids”. A considerable number of species did not clearly group in community trophic structure analysis. The level of taxonomic resolution with that preys are worked affects analysis of trophic niches segregation when analyzing regional and local patterns. Anuran species of tropical dry forest in the Colombian Caribbean display trophic resources partitioning at the level of species and/or morphospecies, as a mechanism of coexistence.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/spa
dc.sourceEcosystemsspa
dc.subjectAmphibiaspa
dc.subjectNeotropical lowlandsspa
dc.subjectTrophic overlapspa
dc.subjectPrey taxonomicspa
dc.subjectResolutionspa
dc.titleAnurans trophic dynamic and guild structure in tropical dry forests of the Caribbean region of Colombiaspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.source.urlhttps://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/fYKysHxjjWxQvTzLgnBnRHD/?lang=enspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120201022spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.relation.referencesADAMS D. 2007. Organization of Plethodon Salamander Communities. Guild-Based Community Assembly. Ecology 88: 1292-1299.spa
dc.relation.referencesALBRECH M & GOTELLI N. 2001. Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecol 126: 134-141.spa
dc.relation.referencesALMEIDA B, SANTOS R, DOS SANTOS T, DE SOUZA M & MENIN M. 2019. Diet of five anuran species in a forest remnant in eastern Acre state, Brazilian Amazonia. Herpetol Notes 12: 945-952.spa
dc.relation.referencesAMARASEKARE P. 2008. Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39: 479-500.spa
dc.relation.referencesANGULO A, RUEDA-ALMONACID J, RODRÍGUEZ-MAHECHA J & LA MARCA E. 2006. Técnicas de Inventario y Monitoreo para los Anfibios de la Región Tropical Andina. Bogotá: Panamericana Formas e Impresos S.A., 299 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesARMBRECHT I & ULLOA-CHACÓN P. 1999. Rareza y Diversidad de Hormigas en Fragmentos de Bosque Seco Colombianos y sus Matrices. Biotropica 3: 646-653.spa
dc.relation.referencesARNAU J. 1996. Métodos y técnicas avanzadas de análisis de datos en ciencias del comportamiento. Barcelona: Editorial Universitat de Barcelona, 366 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBENGTSSON J. 1998. Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 10: 191-199.spa
dc.relation.referencesBENÍTEZ M, MIRAMONTES O & VALIENTE-BANUET A. 2014. Frontiers in Ecology, Evolution and Complexity. Mexico D.F.: EditoraC3, 283 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBIAVATI G, WIEDERHECKER H & COLLI G. 2004. Diet of Epipedobates flavopictus (Anura: Dendrobatidae) in a Neotropical Savanna. J Herpetol 38: 510-518.spa
dc.relation.referencesBLANCO-TORRES A, BARUFFOL M, ACOSTA GALVIS A & NUÑEZ N. 2019. Rasgos funcionales de anfibios de Colombia. Bogotá D. C.: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt- Colciencias, 69 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBLANCO-TORRES A, DURÉ MI, BONILLA MA & CAGNOLO L. 2020. Predator-Prey Interactions in Tropical Dry Forest Anurans of the Colombian Caribbean: A Functional Approach. Biotropica 52: 730-737.spa
dc.relation.referencesBRICEÑO-MÉNDEZ M, NARANJO E, PÉREZ-IRINEO G, CONTRERAS-PERERA Y, SANDOVAL-SERÉS E & HIDALGOMIHART MG. 2017. Richness and trophic guilds of carnivorous mammals in ejido Nuevo Becal, Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. Therya 8: 145-150.spa
dc.relation.referencesBRUSSAARD L. 1998. Soil fauna, guilds, functional groups and ecosystem processes. Appl Soil Ecol 9: 123-135.spa
dc.relation.referencesCAMERO-R E, DÍAZ J, SALINAS A, SALINAS A, TÉLLEZ L & AGUDELO D. 2005. Estudio de la artropofauna asociada a suelos de dos tipos de ecosistemas en la cuenca del río Cauca – Colombia. Acta Biol Colomb 10: 35-44.spa
dc.relation.referencesCERON K, OLIVEIRA-SANTOS LGR, SOUZA CS, MESQUITA DO, CALDAS FL, ARAUJO AC & SANTANA DJ. 2019. Global patterns in anuran-prey networks: structure mediated by latitude. Oikos 128: 1537-1548.spa
dc.relation.referencesCLARKE R. 1974. Food Habits of Toads. Genus Bufo (Amphibia: Bufonidae). Am Midl Nat 91: 140-147.spa
dc.relation.referencesCLAVEL J, JULLIARD R & DEVICTOR V. 2011. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization?. Front Ecol Environ 9: 222-228.spa
dc.relation.referencesCRUMP ML & SCOTT NJ. 1994. Visual encounter surveys. In: Heyer WR et al. (Eds), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Amphibians, Washington DC.: Smithsonian Institution Press, p. 84-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesDUNHAM AE. 1983. Realized niche overlap, resource abundance and intensity of interspecific competition. In: Huey RD et al. (Eds), Lizards Ecology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 261-280.spa
dc.relation.referencesDURÉ M. 1999. Interrelaciones en los nichos tróficos de dos especies sintópicas de la familia hylidae (anura) en un área subtropical de Argentina. Cuadernos Herpetol 13: 11-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesDURÉ M & KEHR A. 1996. Bufo paracnemis (kururu Guazu. Sapo Buey. Sapo Rococo). DIET. Herpetol Rev 27: 138.spa
dc.relation.referencesDURÉ MI, KEHR A & SCHAEFER E. 2009. Niche overlap and resource partitioning among five sympatric bufonids (Anura, Bufonidae) from northeastern Argentina. Phyllomedusa 8: 27-39.spa
dc.relation.referencesENTSMINGER GL. 2012. EcoSim Prefessional: Null modelling software for ecologists. Available from: http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htm » http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htmspa
dc.relation.referencesESCOBAR F. 1997. Estudio de la comunidad de coleópteros coprófagos (Scarabaeidae) en un remanente de bosque seco al norte del Tolima, Colombia. Caldasia 19: 419-430.spa
dc.relation.referencesFEINSINGER P, SPEARS E & POOLE R. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62: 27-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesFERNANDEZ F. 2003. Introducción a las Hormigas de la región Neotropical. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 404 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesFONSECA-PÉREZ KA, MOLINA C & TÁRANO Z. 2017. Diet of Dendropsophus microcephalus and Scarthyla vigilans (Anura: Hylidae) at a locality in north-western Venezuela with notes on microhabitat occupation. Pap Avulsos Zool 57: 93-104.spa
dc.relation.referencesGARCÍA-ROBLEDO C, KUPREWICZ EK, BAER CS, CLIFTON E, HERNÁNDEZ GG & WAGNER DL. 2020. The Erwin equation of biodiversity: From little steps to quantum leaps in the discovery of tropical insect diversity. Biotropica 52: 1-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesGONZÁLEZ-DURAN G, GUTIÉRREZ-CÁRDENAS P & ESCOBAR LASSO S. 2012. Physalaemus pustulosus (Tungara Frog). DIET. Herpetol Rev 43: 124.spa
dc.relation.referencesGOTELLI NJ & ELLISON AM. 2013. EcoSimR, Version 1.00. Available from: http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.html » http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.htmlspa
dc.relation.referencesGOTELLI N & ENTSMINGER G. 2005. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Available from: <http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm>. » http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm>spa
dc.relation.referencesGUISANDE GONZÁLEZ C, VAAMONDE LISTE A & BARREIRO FELPETO A. 2011. Tratamiento de datos con R, Statistica y SPSS. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos, 978 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHAMMER Ø, HARPER D & RYAN P. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesHAWKINS CH & MACMAHON J. 1989. Guilds: The multiple meanings of a concept. Ann Rev Entomol 34: 423-451.spa
dc.relation.referencesHURLBERT S. 1978. The Measurement of Niche Overlap and Some Relatives. Ecology 59: 67-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesISAACS P & HOYOS JM. 2010. Diet of the Cane Toad in Different Vegetation Covers in the Productive Systems of the Colombian Coffee Region. S Am J Herpetol 5: 45-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesISACCH J & BARG M. 2002. Are bufonid toads specialized ant-feeders? A case test from Argentinian flooding pampa. J Nat Hist 36: 2005-2012.spa
dc.relation.referencesJUNKER R, BLÜTHGEN N, BREHM T, BINKENSTEIN J, PAULUS J & SCHAEFER HM. 2013. Specialization on traits as basis for the niche-breadth of flower visitors and as structuring mechanism of ecological networks. Funct Ecol 27: 329-341.spa
dc.relation.referencesLE DT, ROWLEY J, TRAN DTA, VO TN & HOANG HD. 2019. Diet Composition and Overlap in a Montane Frog Community in Vietnam. Herpetol Conserv Biol 13: 205-215.spa
dc.relation.referencesLEVINS R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 132 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesLOPES GN, SOUZA-FILHO MF, GOTELLI NJ, LEMOS L, GODOY W & ZUCCHI R. 2015. Temporal Overlap and Co-Occurrence in a Guild of Sub-Tropical Tephritid Fruit Flies. PLoS ONE 10: e0132124.spa
dc.relation.referencesLÓPEZ J, GHIRARDI R, SCARABOTTI P & MEDRANO M. 2007. Feeding ecology of Elachistocleis bicolor in a riparian locality of the middle Paraná River. Herpetol J 17: 48-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesLUISELLI L & AMORI G. 2016. Diet. In: Dodd CK Jr. (Ed), Reptile Ecology and Conservation a handbook of techniques, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 97-109.spa
dc.relation.referencesMAGURRAN AE. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. London: Blackwell Publishing Company, 215 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesMARTÍNEZ RAMOS M. 2008. Grupos funcionales. In: Soberón J et al. (Eds), Capital natural de México, Vol. I. Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad, Mexico D.F.: Conabio, p. 365-412.spa
dc.relation.referencesMICHELIN G, CERON K & SANTANA DJ. 2020. Prey availability influences the diet of Scinax fuscomarginatus in a Cerrado area, Central Brazil. Anim Biodivers Conserv 43: 169-175.spa
dc.relation.referencesMORIN P. 1983. Predation, Competition, and the Composition of Larval Anuran Guilds. Ecol Monogr 53: 119-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesMUÑOZ-GUERRERO J, SERRANO V & RAMÍREZ-PINILLA M. 2007. Uso de microhábitat, dieta y tiempo de actividad en cuatro especies simpátricas de ranas hílidas neotropicales (Anura: Hylidae). Caldasia 29: 413-425.spa
dc.relation.referencesNARVÁEZ AE & RON SR. 2013. Feeding Habits of Engystomops pustulatus Anura. Leptodactylidae in Western Ecuador. S Am J Herpetol 8: 161-167.spa
dc.relation.referencesPALACIOS-VARGAS J, CASTAÑO-MENESES G, GÓMEZ-ANAYA J, MARTÍNEZ-YRIZAR A, MEJÍA-RECAMIER B & MARTÍNEZ-SÁNCHEZ J. 2007. Litter and soil arthropods diversity and density in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in Western México. Biodivers Conserv 16: 3703-3717.spa
dc.relation.referencesPARKER K, PARKER A & VALE T. 2001. Vertebrate Feeding Guilds in California’s Sierra Nevada. Relations to Environmental Condition and Change in Spatial Scale. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91: 245-262.spa
dc.relation.referencesPARMELEE J. 1999. Trophic ecology of a tropical anuran assemblage. Sci Pap Univ Kansas Nat Hist Mus 11: 1-59.spa
dc.relation.referencesPEREIRA NA, FRIZZAS MR & DE OLIVEIRA CM. 2011. Seasonality in insect abundance in the “Cerrado” of Goiás State, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 55: 79-87.spa
dc.relation.referencesPERRY G & PIANKA E. 1997. Animal foraging. past, present and future. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 360-364.spa
dc.relation.referencesPIANKA E. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4: 53-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesPIATTI L & SOUZA F. 2011. Diet and resource partitioning among anurans in irrigated rice fields in Pantanal, Brazil. Braz J Biol 71: 653-661.spa
dc.relation.referencesPIZANO C & GARCÍA H. 2014. El Bosque Seco Tropical en Colombia. Bogotá D.C: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, 354 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesRANGEL-CH J, LOWY-C P & SANCHEZ-C H. 1995. Región Caribe. In: Rangel-Ch JO (Ed), Colombia Diversidad Biótica I, Bogotá D.C.: Instituto de Ciencias Naturales-Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Inderena, p. 217-232.spa
dc.relation.referencesRANVESTEL AW, LIPS K, PRINGLE C, WHILES M & BIXBY R. 2004. Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshw Biol 49: 274-285.spa
dc.relation.referencesROOT R. 1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr 37: 317-350.spa
dc.relation.referencesSANTANA AS & JUNCÁ F. 2007. Diet of Physalaemus cf. cicada (Leptodactylidae) and Bufo granulosus (Bufonidae) in a semideciduous forest. Braz J Biol 67: 125-131.spa
dc.relation.referencesSILVA FR & ROSSA-FERES DC. 2010. Diet of anurans captured in forest remnants in southeastern Brazil. Rev Esp Herpetol 24: 5-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesSIMBERLOFF D & DAYAN T. 1991. The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22: 115-143.spa
dc.relation.referencesSTUART SN, HOFFMANN M, CHANSON JS, COX NA, BERRIDGE RJ, RAMANI P & YOUNG BE. 2008. Threatened Amphibians of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, Arlington: IUCN, Gland and Conservation International, 776 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesTEIXEIRA R & RÖDDER D. 2007. Diet, foraging strategy and reproduction of Scinax argyreornatus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926) from a mountainous region of the Atlantic rainforest in southeastern Brazil (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetozoa 19: 161-173.spa
dc.relation.referencesTOFT C. 1980a. Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia 45: 131-141.spa
dc.relation.referencesTOFT C. 1980b. Seasonal variation in populations of Panamanian litters frogs and their prey. a comparison of wetter and drier sites. Oecologia 47: 34-38.spa
dc.relation.referencesTOFT C. 1981. Feeding Ecology of Panamanian litter anurans. Patterns in diet and foraging mode. J Herpetol 15: 139-144.spa
dc.relation.referencesTRIPLEHORN C & JOHNSON N. 2005. Borror & DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 881 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesVAN SLUYS M, SCHITTINI GM, MARRA RV, AZEVEDO ARM, VICENTE JJ & VRCIBRADIC D. 2006. Body size, diet and endoparasites of the microhylid frog Chiasmocleis capixaba in an Atlantic Forest areaof southern Bahiastate, Brazil. Braz J Biol 66: 167-173.spa
dc.relation.referencesVARGAS-SALINAS F, MUÑOZ-AVILA JA & MORALES-PUENTES ME. 2019. Biología de los anfibios y reptiles en el bosque seco tropical del norte de Colombia. Tunja: Editorial UPTC, 484 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesVITT L & CALDWELL J. 2009. Herpetology An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 3rd edition. San Diego: Elsevier Inc, 713 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesVITT L & CALDWELL J. 2014. Herpetology An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles, 4th edition. San Diego: Academic Press, 749 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesWELLS KD. 2007. The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 1162 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesWHITFIELD M & DONELLY M. 2006. Ontogenetic and seasonal variation in the diets of a Costa Rican leaf-litter herpetofauna. J Trop Ecol 22: 409-417.spa
dc.relation.referencesWILLIAMS S & HERO J. 1998. Rainforest Frogs of the Australian Wet Tropics. Guild Classification and the Ecological Similarity of Declining Species. Proc Biol Sci 265: 597-602.spa
dc.relation.referencesWINEMILLER KO & PIANKA ER. 1990. Organization in natural assemblages of desert lizards and tropical fishes. Ecol Monogr 60: 27-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesWOLFF M. 2006. Insectos de Colombia. Medellín: Multimpresos Ltda, 460 p.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3154]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC0 1.0 Universal
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC0 1.0 Universal