Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorArellana, Julianspa
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Stephaniespa
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Miguelspa
dc.contributor.authorCantillo, Víctorspa
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-16T21:00:27Z
dc.date.available2024
dc.date.available2022-03-16T21:00:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9080spa
dc.description.abstractConsidering the high crash rates involving pedestrians on urban roads, it is highly relevant to understanding pedestrian crossing behavior. This paper is the first to combine stated preference (SP) and revealed preference (RP) data to evaluate the impact that individual attributes, trip characteristics, built environment, strategies to prevent unauthorized crossing, and traffic flows have on pedestrians crossing decisions in an urban context. SP and RP surveys were designed and collected in Barranquilla (Colombia) near pedestrian bridges or signalized intersections where direct crossings and a high concentration of pedestrian fatalities related to traffic accidents exist. A logit model was estimated using the data enrichment paradigm. Results show that pedestrians weigh risks and costs when choosing how to cross the road. The trajectories observed in the RP component suggest that people prefer direct crossings; nevertheless, pedestrian bridges and signalized intersections can be attractive alternatives if their location matches the origin or destination of the crossing, and no detour is needed to use them. Waiting time; safety; the fine imposed for jaywalking; personal security, and previous decisions are also variables that influence pedestrian behavior when crossing urban roads. These results can be helpful to urban planners and decision-makers interested in proposing appropriate pedestrian infrastructure. The data pooling technique and the inclusion of a cost-related variable (i.e., fine) allowed computing the willingness to pay and marginal substitution rates for attributes of the built environment and other characteristics associated with the crossing decision. Also, the inclusion of several crossing alternatives and situations allowed assessing pedestrian crossing preferences under different scenarios.eng
dc.format.extent17 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevierspa
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.titleAnalyzing pedestrian behavior when crossing urban roads by combining RP and SP dataeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.01.012spa
dc.source.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847822000183spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trf.2022.01.012spa
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalScience of the Total Environmentspa
dc.relation.referencesAnciaes and Jones, 2018 P.R. Anciaes, P. Jones Estimating preferences for different types of pedestrian crossing facilities Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 52 (2018), pp. 222-237, 10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.025spa
dc.relation.referencesArellana et al., 2021 J. Arellana, V. Alvarez, D. Oviedo, L.A. Guzman Walk this way: Pedestrian accessibility and equity in Barranquilla and Soledad Colombia. Research in Transportation Economics, 86 (2021), p. 2020, 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101024spa
dc.relation.referencesArellana et al., 2012 J. Arellana, A. Daly, S. Hess, J. de Dios Ortúzar, L.I. Rizzi Development of Surveys for Study of Departure Time Choice: Two-Stage Approach to Efficient Design Transportation Research Record, 2303 (1) (2012), pp. 9-18, 10.3141/2303-02spa
dc.relation.referencesArellana et al., 2020 J. Arellana, L. Garzón, J. Estrada, V. Cantillo On the use of virtual immersive reality for discrete choice experiments to modelling pedestrian behaviour Journal of Choice Modelling, 37 (March) (2020), pp. 1-18, 10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100251spa
dc.relation.referencesArellana et al., 2020 J. Arellana, M. Saltarín, A.M. Larrañaga, V. Alvarez, C.A. Henao Urban walkability considering pedestrians' perceptions of the built environment: A 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America Transport Reviews, 40 (2) (2020), pp. 183-203spa
dc.relation.referencesBendak et al., 2021 S. Bendak, A.M. Alnaqbi, M.Y. Alzarooni, S.M. Aljanaahi, S.J. Alsuwaidi Factors affecting pedestrian behaviors at signalized crosswalks: An empirical study Journal of Safety Research (2021), 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.019spa
dc.relation.referencesBertulis and Dulaski, 2014 T. Bertulis, D.M. Dulaski Driver Approach Speed and Its Impact on Driver Yielding to Pedestrian Behavior at Unsignalized Crosswalks Transportation Research Record, 2464 (1) (2014), pp. 46-51, 10.3141/2464-06spa
dc.relation.referencesCantillo-García et al., 2019 Cantillo-García, V., Guzman, L. A., & Arellana, J. (2019). Socioeconomic strata as proxy variable for household income in transportation research. Evaluation for Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and Barranquilla. DYNA (Colombia), 86(211), 258–267. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821.spa
dc.relation.referencesCantillo et al., 2015 V. Cantillo, J. Arellana, M. Rolong Modelling pedestrian crossing behaviour in urban roads: A latent variable approach Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32 (2015), pp. 56-67, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.008spa
dc.relation.referencesCantillo et al., 2020 V. Cantillo, L. Márquez, C.J. Díaz An exploratory analysis of factors associated with traffic crashes severity in Cartagena Colombia. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 146 (September) (2020), 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105749spa
dc.relation.referencesCantillo et al., 2007 Cantillo, V., Ortúzar, JdD, J., & Williams, H. C. W. L. (2007). Modeling discrete choices in the presence of inertia and serial correlation. Transportation Science, 41(2), 195–205. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1060.0178.spa
dc.relation.referencesDada et al., 2019 M. Dada, M. Zuidgeest, S. Hess Modelling pedestrian crossing choice on Cape Town's freeways: Caught between a rock and a hard place? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60 (2019), pp. 245-261, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.005spa
dc.relation.referencesDane, 2018 DANE. (2018). Resultados censo nacional de población y viviendas. Retrieved from https://www.dane.gov.co/files/censo2018/informacion-tecnica/presentaciones-territorio/180719-CNPV-presentacion-Atlantico.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesDemiroz et al., 2015 Y.I. Demiroz, P. Onelcin, Y. Alver Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use Accident Analysis and Prevention, 80 (2015), pp. 220-228, 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.018spa
dc.relation.referencesGuzman et al., 2021 Guzman, L. A., Arellana, J., & Camargo, J. P. (2021). A hybrid discrete choice model to understand the effect of public policy on fare evasion discouragement in Bogotá's Bus Rapid Transit. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 151(November 2020), 140–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.07.009.spa
dc.relation.referencesHan and Chang, 2021 S. Han, J.S. Chang Identifying Priority Crosswalk Locations in Urban Road Networks Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147 (2) (2021), p. 04021014, 10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000679spa
dc.relation.referencesHasan and Napiah, 2018 R. Hasan, M. Napiah The perception of Malaysian pedestrians toward the use of footbridges Traffic Injury Prevention, 19 (3) (2018), pp. 29 2-297, 10.1080/15389588.2017.1373768spa
dc.relation.referencesHasan et al., 2020 R. Hasan, O. Oviedo-Trespalacios, M. Napiah An intercept study of footbridge users and non-users in Malaysia Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73 (2020), pp. 66-79, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.011spa
dc.relation.referencesHensher et al., 2011 Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., Ortúzar, J. de D., & Rizzi, L. I. (2011). Estimating the Value of Risk Reduction for Pedestrians in the Road Environment: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling, 4(2), 70–94. doi: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70058-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesHensher et al., 1998 D. Hensher, J. Louviere, J. Swait Combining sources of preference data Journal of Econometrics, 89 (1–2) (1998), pp. 197-221, 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00061-Xspa
dc.relation.referencesHolland and Hill, 2007 C. Holland, R. Hill The effect of age, gender and driver status on pedestrians' intentions to cross the road in risky situations Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39 (2) (2007), pp. 224-237, 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.003spa
dc.relation.referencesNacional and de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses, , 2020 Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses. (2020). Forensis. Retrieved from https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/cifras-estadisticas/forensis.spa
dc.relation.referencesJha et al., 2017 A. Jha, G. Tiwari, D. Mohan, S. Mukherjee, S. Banerjee Analysis of pedestrian movement on Delhi roads by using naturalistic observation techniques Transportation Research Record, 2634 (2634) (2017), pp. 95-100, 10.3141/2634-14spa
dc.relation.referencesLam and Xie, 2002 S.H. Lam, F. Xie Transit path-choice models that use revealed preference and stated preference data Transportation Research Record, 1799 (2002), pp. 58-65, 10.3141/1799-08spa
dc.relation.referencesLarranaga et al., 2019 Larranaga, A. M., Arellana, J., Rizzi, L. I., Strambi, O., & Cybis, H. B. B. (2019). Using best–worst scaling to identify barriers to walkability: a study of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Transportation (Vol. 46). Springer US. doi: 10.1007/s11116-018-9944-x.spa
dc.relation.referencesLarrañaga et al., 2016 A.M. Larrañaga, L.I. Rizzi, J. Arellana, O. Strambi, H.B.B. Cybis The influence of built environment and travel attitudes on walking: A case study of Porto Alegre Brazil. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10 (4) (2016), pp. 332-342, 10.1080/15568318.2014.933986spa
dc.relation.referencesLee et al., 2021 Y.M. Lee, R. Madigan, O. Giles, L. Garach-Morcillo, G. Markkula, C. Fox, N. Merat Road users rarely use explicit communication when interacting in today's traffic: Implications for automated vehicles Cognition, Technology and Work, 23 (2) (2021), pp. 367-380, 10.1007/s10111-020-00635-yspa
dc.relation.referencesLi et al., 2009 Li, A., Peng, Q., Zhang, L., & Huang, J. (2009). The Determinant of Pedestrian's Unsafe Behaviors in Urban Traffic System — An Empirical Analysis Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). In International Conference on Transportation Engineering. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849873-6.00001-7%0Ahttp://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_venes/article/view/1112%0Ahttps://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2018/05/18/1337/persentase-panjang-jalan-tol-yang-beroperasi-menurut-operatornya-2014.html.spa
dc.relation.referencesLouviere et al., 2000 J.J. Louviere, D.A. Hensher, J.D. Swait Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications Cambridge Press (2000)spa
dc.relation.referencesLucchesi et al., 2021 Lucchesi, S., Larranaga, A. M., Bettella Cybis, H. B., Abreu e Silva, J. A. de, & Arellana, J. A. (2021). Are people willing to pay more to live in a walking environment? A multigroup analysis of the impact of walkability on real estate values and their moderation effects in two Global South cities. Research in Transportation Economics, 86(May 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100976.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucchesi et al., 2020 S.T. Lucchesi, A.M. Larranaga, J.A.A. Ochoa, A.A.B. Samios, H.B.B. Cybis The role of security and walkability in subjective wellbeing: A multigroup analysis among different age cohorts Research in Transportation Business and Management (2020), p. 100559, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100559spa
dc.relation.referencesMartinez et al., 2019 Martinez, S., Sanchez, R., & Yañez-Pagans, P. (2019). Road safety: challenges and opportunities in Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin American Economic Review 2019 28:1, 28(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1186/S40503-019-0078-0.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcfadden, 1981 Mcfadden, D. (1981). Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, (198272). Retrieved from https://elsa.berkeley.edu/∼mcfadden/discrete/ch5.pdf.spa
dc.relation.referencesMfinanga, 2014 D.A. Mfinanga Implication of pedestrians stated preference of certain attributes of crosswalks Transport Policy, 32 (2014), pp. 156-164, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.011spa
dc.relation.referencesObeng-atuah et al., 2017 Obeng-Atuah, D., Poku-Boansi, & M., Cobbinah, P. B. (2017). Pedestrian crossing in urban Ghana: Safety implications. Journal of Transport & Health, 5, 55-69.spa
dc.relation.referencesObservatorio nacional de seguridad vial, 2020 Observatorio nacional de seguridad vial. (2020). Boletín estadistico Barranquilla. Retrieved from https://ansv.gov.co/observatorio/.spa
dc.relation.referencesOviedo-Trespalacios and Haworth, 2015 O. Oviedo-Trespalacios, N. Haworth Developing a new index for comparing road safety maturity: Case study of the ASEAN Community Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety, 26 (4) (2015), pp. 45-53spa
dc.relation.referencesOviedo-Trespalacios and Scott-Parker, 2017 Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., & Scott-Parker, B. (2017). Footbridge usage in high-traffic flow highways: The intersection of safety and security in pedestrian decision-making. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 49, 177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.010.spa
dc.relation.referencesPapadimitriou, 2012 E. Papadimitriou Theory and models of pedestrian crossing behaviour along urban trips Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15 (1) (2012), pp. 75-94, 10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.007spa
dc.relation.referencesPapadimitriou et al., 2016 E. Papadimitriou, S. Lassarre, G. Yannis Pedestrian Risk Taking While Road Crossing: A Comparison of Observed and Declared Behaviour Transportation Research Procedia, 14 (2016), pp. 4354-4363, 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.357spa
dc.relation.referencesPapadimitriou et al., 2012 E. Papadimitriou, G. Yannis, J. Golias Analysis of Pedestrian Exposure to Risk in Relation to Crossing Behavior Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2299 (1) (2012), pp. 79-90, 10.3141/2299-09spa
dc.relation.referencesPatra et al., 2020 M. Patra, V. Perumal, K.V.K. Rao Modelling the effects of risk factor and time savings on pedestrians' choice of crossing facilities at signalized intersections Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8 (2) (2020), pp. 460-470, 10.1016/j.cstp.2019.10.010spa
dc.relation.referencesPoó et al., 2018 F.M. Poó, R.D. Ledesma, R. Trujillo Pedestrian crossing behavior, an observational study in the city of Ushuaia Argentina. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19 (3) (2018), pp. 305-310, 10.1080/15389588.2017.1391380spa
dc.relation.referencesPursula and Weurlander, 1999 M. Pursula, M. Weurlander Modeling level-of-service factors in public transportation route choice Transport Research Record, 1669 (1) (1999), pp. 30-37spa
dc.relation.referencesQuistberg et al., 2014 D.A. Quistberg, T.D. Koepsell, L.N. Boyle, J.J. Miranda, B.D. Johnston, B.E. Ebel Pedestrian signalization and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in Lima, Peru Accident Analysis & Prevention, 70 (2014), pp. 273-281, 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.012spa
dc.relation.referencesRankavat and Tiwari, 2016 S. Rankavat, G. Tiwari Pedestrians perceptions for utilization of pedestrian facilities – Delhi, India Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42 (2016), pp. 495-499, 10.1016/j.trf.2016.02.005spa
dc.relation.referencesRäsänen et al., 2007 M. Räsänen, T. Lajunen, F. Alticafarbay, C. Aydin Pedestrian self-reports of factors influencing the use of pedestrian bridges Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39 (5) (2007), pp. 969-973, 10.1016/j.aap.2007.01.004spa
dc.relation.referencesSinclair and Zuidgeest, 2016 M. Sinclair, M. Zuidgeest Investigations into pedestrian crossing choices on Cape Town freeways Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42 (2016), pp. 479-494, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.006spa
dc.relation.referencesSisiopiku and Akin, 2003 V.P. Sisiopiku, D. Akin Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: An examination based on observation and survey data Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6 (4) (2003), pp. 249-274, 10.1016/j.trf.2003.06.001spa
dc.relation.referencesSoathong et al., 2021 Soathong, A., Chowdhury, S., Wilson, D., & Ranjitkar, P. (2021). Investigating the motivation for pedestrians' risky crossing behaviour at urban mid-block road sections. Travel Behaviour and Society, 22(May 2020), 155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.09.005.spa
dc.relation.referencesTao et al., 2009 W. Tao, S. Mehndiratta, E. Deakin Compulsory Convenience ? How large arterials and land use affect midblock crossing in Fushun, China Journal of Transport and Land Use. (2009)spa
dc.relation.referencesUttley and Fotios, 2017 J. Uttley, S. Fotios The effect of ambient light condition on road traffic collisions involving pedestrians on pedestrian crossings Accident Analysis and Prevention, 108 (September) (2017), pp. 189-200, 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.005spa
dc.relation.referencesVallejo-Borda et al., 2020 J.A. Vallejo-Borda, V. Cantillo, A. Rodriguez-Valencia A perception-based cognitive map of the pedestrian perceived quality of service on urban sidewalks Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73 (2020), pp. 107-118, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.013spa
dc.relation.referencesVictoria and Galvis, 2014 I.C. Victoria, O. Galvis Road Safety Conditions and Estimated Economic Cost of Traffic Fatalities in Medium-Size Colombian Cities Transportation Research Record, 2465 (1) (2014), pp. 40-47, 10.3141/2465-06spa
dc.relation.referencesVillaveces et al., 2012 A. Villaveces, L.A. Nieto, D. Ortega, J.F. Ríos, J.J. Medina, M.I. Gutiérrez, D. Rodríguez Pedestrians’ perceptions of walkability and safety in relation to the built environment in Cali, Colombia, 2009–10 Injury Prevention, 18 (5) (2012), pp. 291-297, 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040223spa
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization, 2019 World Health Organization. (2019). Global status report on road safety 2018. WHO. Zareharofteh et al., 2021 F. Zareharofteh, A. Hidarnia, M.A. Morowatisharifabad, M. Eslami Unsafe behaviours in Iranian adult pedestrians Journal of Transport and Health, 21 (March) (2021), 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101058spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang et al., 2019 Zhang, C., Chen, F., & Wei, Y. (2019). Evaluation of pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks with different numbers of lanes in China. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 123(December 2018), 263–273. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.002.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang et al., 2018 C. Zhang, B. Zhou, T.Z. Qiu, S. Liu Pedestrian crossing behaviors at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in developing world Journal of Safety Research, 64 (2018), pp. 145-154, 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.12.018spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang et al., 2016 W. Zhang, K. Wang, L. Wang, Z. Feng, Y. Du Exploring factors affecting pedestrians' red-light running behaviors at intersections in China Accident Analysis and Prevention, 96 (2016), pp. 71-78, 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.038spa
dc.relation.referencesZhu and Sze, 2021 Zhu, D., & Sze, N. N. (2021). Propensities of red light running of pedestrians at the two-stage crossings with split pedestrian signal phases. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 151(September 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105958.spa
dc.subject.proposalVulnerable road userseng
dc.subject.proposalPedestrian crossing behavioreng
dc.subject.proposalChoice modelseng
dc.subject.proposalRP-SP dataeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationendpage275spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage259spa
dc.relation.citationvolume85spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3156]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.