Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHuéscar Hernández, Elisaspa
dc.contributor.authorLOZANO-JIMÉNEZ, JOSÉ EDUARDOspa
dc.contributor.authorde Roba Noguera, José Miguelspa
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Murcia, Juan Antoniospa
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-13T20:32:21Z
dc.date.available2022-05-13T20:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-14
dc.identifier.citationHernández EH, Lozano-Jiménez JE, de Roba Noguera JM, Moreno-Murcia JA (2022) Relationships among instructor autonomy support, and university students’ learning approaches, perceived professional competence, and life satisfaction. PLoS ONE 17(4): e0266039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266039spa
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9160spa
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine relationships among instructor autonomy support for student learning, and students’ motivational characteristics, learning approaches, perceptions of career competence and life satisfaction. Participated 1048 students from Spanish universities with ages between 18, and 57 years. A Structural equation modeling revealed a relationship between instructor autonomy support for student learning with students’ basic psychological need satisfaction. As a result, students’ basic need satisfaction was related to their intrinsic motivation, and to a deeper learning approach. These educational outcomes contributed to explain students’perceived professional competence, and life satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance of student choice, and decision-making in the learning process as a means to facilitating deeper learning, stronger feelings of professional competence, and enhanced well-being.eng
dc.format.extent12 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencespa
dc.rights© 2022 Hernández et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.spa
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.titleRelationships among instructor autonomy support, and university students’ learning approaches, perceived professional competence, and life satisfactioneng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dcterms.audienceEstudiantes universitariosspa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266039spa
dc.source.urlhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266039spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0266039spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS ONEspa
dc.relation.references1. Moreno R, Morales S. Social-personal competencies for the social-workplace involvement of youth in programs of social education. Rev Esp de Ori y Pedag. 2017; 28(1): 33–50.spa
dc.relation.references2. Sua´rez B. The Spanish university facing the employability of its graduates. Rev Esp de Orien Psicop. 2014; 25(2): 90–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.25.num.2.2014.13522spa
dc.relation.references3. Izquierdo T. Duration of unemployment, and attitudes of individuals older than 45 years in Portugal, and Spain: A comparative study. Rev de Cien Soc. 2015; 21(1): 21–29.spa
dc.relation.references4. Izquierdo T, Farı´as A. Employability, and expectations of success in the workplace among university students. Rev Esp de Orie y Psic. 2018; 29(2): 29–40.spa
dc.relation.references5. Moreno R, Barranco R, Dı´az M. Methods of contact: A proposal of teaching-learning for the acquisition of professional competencies in social education. Sensos. 2015; 9(1): 123–135.spa
dc.relation.references6. Lo´pez J. A Copernican revolution in university instruction: Formation of competencies. Rev de Educ. 2011; 356: 279–301.spa
dc.relation.references7. Salmero´n L. Activities that promote learning transfer: A review of the literatura. Rev de Educ. 2013; nÚmero extraordinario: 34–53.spa
dc.relation.references8. Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press; 2017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7202/1041847arspa
dc.relation.references9. Owen K, Smith J, Lubans D, Ng J, Lonsdale C. Self-determined motivation, and physical activity in children, and adolescents: A systematic review, and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2014; 67: 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.033 PMID: 25073077spa
dc.relation.references10. Kaplan H. Teachers’ autonomy support, autonomy suppression, and conditional negative regard as predictors of optimal learning experience among high-achieving Bedouin students. Soc Psyc of Educ. 2017; 21: 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9405-y.spa
dc.relation.references11. Reeve J. Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In Wang J, Liu W, Ryan R, editors. Building autonomous learners: Perspectives from research, and practice using self-determination theory. 2016. pp. 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7.spa
dc.relation.references12. Cheon S, Reeve J. A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Cont Educ Psyc. 2015: 40: 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004.spa
dc.relation.references13. Herna´ndez P, Ara´n A, Salmero´n H. Learning approaches, and teaching methodologies in the university. Rev Iber de Educ. 2012; 60(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.35362/rie6031299.spa
dc.relation.references14. Jang H, Kim E, Reeve J. Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Lear and Inst. 2016; 43: 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.spa
dc.relation.references15. Nu´ñez J, Ferna´ndez C, Leo´n J, Grijalvo F. The relationship between teacher´s autonomy support, and students´ autonomy, and vitality. Teach and Teach: The and Prac. 2015; 25(3): 191–202. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/13540602.2014.928127.spa
dc.relation.references16. Herna´ndez P, Rosario P, Cuesta Saez J. Impact of a program of self-regulation on learning of university students. Rev de Educ. 2010; 353: 571–588.spa
dc.relation.references17. Gutie´rrez M, Toma´s J. Clima motivacional en clase, motivacio´n y e´xito acade´mico en estudiantes universitarios. Rev de Psic. 2018; 23(2): 77–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.02.001.spa
dc.relation.references18. Tilga H, Hein V, Koka A, Hamilton K, Hagger M. The role of teachers’ controlling behaviour in physical education on adolescents’ healthrelated quality of life: test of a conditional process model. Educ Psyc. 2019; 39(7): 862–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1546830.spa
dc.relation.references19. Deci E, Ryan R. Self-determination theory. In Van Lange P, Kruglanski W, Higgins E, editors. Handbook of theories social psychology. 2012. pp. 416–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21.spa
dc.relation.references20. Vansteenkiste M, Sierens E, Goossens L, Soenens B, Dochy F, Mouratidid A, et al. Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support, and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation, and problem behavior. Learn and Inst. 2012; 22: 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. learninstruc.2012.04.002.spa
dc.relation.references21. Herna´ndez A, Silveira Y, Moreno-Murcia J. Acquisition of professional competence through autonomy support, psychological mediators, and motivation. Bord Rev Pedag. 2015; 67(4): 61–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2015.67406.spa
dc.relation.references22. Cheon S, Reeve J, Song Y. A teacher-focused intervention to decrease PE students’ amotivation by increasing need satisfaction, and decreasing need frustration. J of Sp and Exer Psy. 2016; 38: 217– 235. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0236.spa
dc.relation.references23. Me´rida R. The controversial application of competency development in university instructors. Rev de doc univ. 2013; 11(1): 185–212.spa
dc.relation.references24. Gonza´lez J, Del Rincon B, Delio A. Latent structuren and internal consistency of the R-SPQ-2F: Reinterpreting learning approaches in the EEFS. Rev de Inv Educ. 2011; 29(2): 277–293.spa
dc.relation.references25. Dome´nech F, Go´mez A. Relationship among student psychological needs, learning approaches, and avoidance, and performance strategies. Elec J of Res in Educ Psy. 2011; 9(2); 463–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v9i24.1445.spa
dc.relation.references26. Dart B, Burnett P, Purdie N, Boulton-Lewis G, Campbell J, Smith D. Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. J of Educ Res. 2000; 93(4): 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598715.spa
dc.relation.references27. Bieg S, Backes S, Mittag W. The role of intrinsic motivation for teaching, teachers’ care, and autonomy support in students’ self- determined motivation. J for Educ Res Onl. 2011; 3: 122–140.spa
dc.relation.references28. Gargallo B, Gargafella P, Pe´rez C. Learning approaches, and academic performance in university students. Bord Rev Pedag. 2006; 58(3): 327–344. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/39598.spa
dc.relation.references29. Herrmann K, Bager-Elsborg A, McCune V. Investigating the relationships between approaches to learning, learner identities, and academic achievement in higher education. High Educ. 2016; 74: 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9999-6.spa
dc.relation.references30. Moreno-Murcia J, Ruı´z M, Silveira Garcı´a A.Estimation of deep student learning through a social cognitive model. Profes Rev de currı´ y form del prof. 2017; 21(3): 239–257.spa
dc.relation.references31. Moreno-Murcia J, Silveira Y. Toward a better prediction of workplace competence in university students. Rev de Doc Univ. 2015; 13(1): 277–292.spa
dc.relation.references32. Saldern M von, Littig K. Landau Classroom Social Climate Scales (LASSO 4–13). Beltz; 1987.spa
dc.relation.references33. Leo´n J, Domı´nguez E, Pe´rez A, Nu´ñez J, Martin-Albo J. Translation, and validation of the Spanish versio´n of the Scale of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction. An de Psic. 2011; 28(2): 405–411.spa
dc.relation.references34. Gillet N, Rosnet E, Vallerand R. Development of a scale for the satisfactions of basic needs in the sport context. Can J of Beh Sci 2008; 40: 230–237. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0013201.spa
dc.relation.references35. Vallerand R, Blais R, Briere N Pelletier L. Construction, and validation of the Scale of Motivation in Education. Can J of Beh Sci. 1989; 21: 323–349. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0079855.spa
dc.relation.references36. Nu´ñez J, Martı´n-Albo J, Navarro J. Validation of the Spanish versio´n of the Scale of Motivation in Education. Psicot. 2005; 17(2): 344–349.spa
dc.relation.references37. Recio M, Cabrero J. Learning approaches, academic performance,e and satisfaction of students in virtual learning environments. Pixel-Bit Rev de Med y Educ. 2005; 25: 93–115.spa
dc.relation.references38. Atienza F, Balaguer I, Garcı´a-Merita M. Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Pers and Indiv Diff. 2003; 35: 1255–1260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X.spa
dc.relation.references39. Rodrı´guez M., Ruiz M. (2008). Atenuacio´n de la asimetrı´a y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicolo´gica: Rev. Met. y psic. Exp., 29, 205–227.spa
dc.relation.references40. Hu L., Bentler P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.spa
dc.relation.references41. Leo´n J, Nu´ñez J, Liew J. Self-determination, and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learn and Indiv Diff. 2015; 43: 166–163. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017.spa
dc.relation.references42. Ryan R, Weinstein N. Undermining quality teaching, and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theo and Res in Educ. 2009; 7: 224–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108661362.002.spa
dc.relation.references43. Ortega M. Emerging competencies in teacher facing the demands of the European higher education space. Rev Esp de Educ Comp. 2010; 16: 305–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/reec.16.2010.7534.spa
dc.relation.references44. Ryan R, Deci E. Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In Wentzel K, Wigfield A, editors. Handbook of motivation at school. 2009. pp. 171–195. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203879498.spa
dc.relation.references45. Reeve J, Ryan R, Deci E, Jang H. Understanding, and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A selfdetermination perspective. In Schunk D, Zimmerman B, editors. Motivation, and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. 2008. pp. 223–244. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203831076.spa
dc.relation.references46. Anataramian S, Huebner E, Valois R. Adolescent life satisfaction. App Psyc. 2018; 57: 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00357.x.spa
dc.relation.references47. Bagoien T, Halvari H, Nesheim H. Self-determined motivation physical education, and its links to motivation for leisure-time physical activity, and well-being in general. Perc and Mot Skil. 2010; 111(2): 407–432. https://doi.org/10.2466%2F06.10.11.13.14.PMS.111.5.407-432.spa
dc.relation.references48. Brown T, Fry M. Motivational climate, staff, and members’ behaviors, and members’ psychological wellbeing at a national fitness franchise. Res Quar for Exer and Sp. 2014; 85: 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.893385.spa
dc.relation.references49. Gutie´rrez M, Toma´s J, Calatayud P. Influence of the motivational climate in Physical Education on learning goals, and life satisfaction. Retos. 2017; 31: 157–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i31. 49421.spa
dc.relation.references50. Vallerand R. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic, and extrinsic motivation. Adv in Exp Soc Psyc. 1997; 29: 271–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2.spa
dc.subject.proposalHuman learningeng
dc.subject.proposalInstructorseng
dc.subject.proposalSocial psychologyeng
dc.subject.proposalLanguageeng
dc.subject.proposalDeep learningeng
dc.subject.proposalPsychologyeng
dc.subject.proposalDecision makingeng
dc.subject.proposalTeacherseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationendpage12spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3154]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© 2022 Hernández et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como © 2022 Hernández et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.