Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)spa
dc.contributor.authorHERVAS-OLIVER, JOSE LUIS
dc.contributor.authorBelso-Martinez, José A.
dc.contributor.authorDíez-Vial, Isabel
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T12:37:01Z
dc.date.available2023-04-04
dc.date.available2022-09-28T12:37:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-04
dc.identifier.citationJose-Luis Hervas-Oliver, Jose Antonio Belso-Martínez & Isabel Díez-Vial (2022) Multinationals’ recruiting in industrial districts, Regional Studies, 56:8, 1320-1332, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1967921spa
dc.identifier.issn0034-3404spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9533
dc.description.abstractThis paper explains how multinationals source specific tacit and sticky technical knowledge in industrial districts through recruiting. Focusing on the location of the textile-dedicated company ZARA in a footwear-dedicated Marshallian industrial district, we study its recruiting strategy using mixed methods. ZARA recruits district footwear expertise by seeking primarily local workers with strong relational ties and intensive tacit knowledge originating from the best footwear-dedicated local firms that master knowledge on operations and expertise on managing local networks of subcontractors. Good local firms involuntarily benefit newcomer multinationals. The net effect on the district is the result of the tension between poaching and embeddedness and anchoring effects.eng
dc.format.extent1 páginaspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherRoutledgespa
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Informa UK Limitedeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343404.2021.1967921?journalCode=cres20spa
dc.titleMultinationals’ recruiting in industrial districtseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00343404.2021.1967921
dc.identifier.eissn1360-0591spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRegional Studiesspa
dc.relation.referencesAgndal, H., Chetty, S. K., & Wilson, H. (2008). Social capital dynamics and foreign market entry. International Business Review, 17(6), 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.09.006spa
dc.relation.referencesAlmeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905spa
dc.relation.referencesAlmeida, R. (2007). The labor market effects of foreign owned firms. Journal of International Economics, 72(3), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.10.001spa
dc.relation.referencesAngeli, F., Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2014). Directions and paths of knowledge flows through labour mobility: A social capital perspective. Regional Studies, 48(11), 1896–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.756579spa
dc.relation.referencesBecattini, G. (1979). Dal settore industriale al distretto industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull'unità d'indagine dell'economia industriale. Rivista di economia e politica industriale, 5(1), 7–21.spa
dc.relation.referencesBecattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial districts and local economic regeneration (pp. 37–51). International Institute for Labor Studies.spa
dc.relation.referencesBecattini, G. (1991). Industrial districts: Problems and perspectives. International Studies of Management & Organization, 21(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1991.11656551spa
dc.relation.referencesBellandi, M. (1989). The industrial district in Marshall. In E. Goodman, J. Bamford, & P. Saynor (Eds.), Small firms and industrial districts in Italy (pp. 136–152). Routledge Library Editions.spa
dc.relation.referencesBellandi, M. (2001). Local development and embedded large firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 13(3), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620110051103spa
dc.relation.referencesBellandi, M., & De Propris, L. (2015). Three generations of industrial districts. Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research, 32, 75–87.spa
dc.relation.referencesBellandi, M., De Propris, L., & Santini, E. (2019). An evolutionary analysis of industrial districts: The changing multiplicity of production know-how nuclei. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bey012spa
dc.relation.referencesBelso-Martínez, J., López-Sanchez, M., & Mateu-Garcia, R. (2018). New MNE subsidiaries in old clusters: When, why, and how. Review of Managerial Science, 12(2), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0268-6spa
dc.relation.referencesBelso-Martínez, J., López Sánchez, M., & Pérez Martín, A. (2015). Inditex y el cluster del Vinalopó: ¿Una relación simbiótica sostenible en el tiempo? Economía industrial, 397, 155–167.spa
dc.relation.referencesBelso-Martinez, J. A. (2006). Do industrial districts influence export performance and export intensity? Evidence for Spanish SMEs’ internationalization process. European Planning Studies, 14(6), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500496115spa
dc.relation.referencesBelussi, F. (2018). New perspectives on the evolution of clusters. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1796–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1492059spa
dc.relation.referencesBelussi, F., & Hervás-Oliver, J.-L. (2016). Unfolding cluster evolution. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoschma, R. A., Eriksson, R., & Lindgren, U. (2009). How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn041spa
dc.relation.referencesBrusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: Productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035506spa
dc.relation.referencesCantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. (2005). MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.497spa
dc.relation.referencesCohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553spa
dc.relation.referencesCombes, P. P., & Duranton, G. (2006). Labour pooling, labour poaching, and spatial clustering. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.06.003spa
dc.relation.referencesCooper, D. P. (2001). Innovation and reciprocal externalities: Information transmission via job mobility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 45(4), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00154-8spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Propris, L., & Crevoisier, O. (2011). From regional anchors to anchoring. In D. S. and F, T. P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, & R. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 167–177). Edward Elgar.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Propris, L., & Driffield, N. (2006). The importance of clusters for spillovers from foreign direct investment and technology sourcing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei059spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Propris, L., Menghinello, S., & Sugden, R. (2008). The internationalisation of production systems: Embeddedness, openness and governance. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(6), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620802462074spa
dc.relation.referencesFeldman, M. (2003). The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Industry and Innovation, 10(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271032000141661spa
dc.relation.referencesFeldman, M., Kenney, M., & Lissoni, F. (2015). The New data frontier: Special issue of research policy. Research Policy, 44(9), 1629–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.007spa
dc.relation.referencesFeldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2015). Triangulating regional economies: Realizing the promise of digital data. Research Policy, 44(9), 1785–1793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.015spa
dc.relation.referencesHervás-Oliver, J. L. (2015). How do multinational enterprises co-locate in industrial districts? An introduction to the integration of alternative explanations from international business and economic geography literatures. Investigaciones Regionales, 32, 115–132.spa
dc.relation.referencesHervas-Oliver, J. L. (2021b). Industry 4.0 in industrial districts: Regional innovation policy for the Toy Valley district in Spain. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1939861spa
dc.relation.referencesHervás-Oliver, J.-L., & Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5–6), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.933489spa
dc.relation.referencesHervás-Oliver, J.-L., & Boix-Domenech, R. (2013). The economic geography of the meso-global spaces: Integrating multinationals and clusters at the local–global level. European Planning Studies, 21(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.733853spa
dc.relation.referencesHervás-Oliver, J.-L., Lleo, M., & Cervello, R. (2017). The dynamics of cluster entrepreneurship: Knowledge legacy from parents or agglomeration effects? The case of the Castellon ceramic tile district. Research Policy, 46(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.006spa
dc.relation.referencesHervás-Oliver, J. L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021a). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9), article 104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316spa
dc.relation.referencesKlepper, S. (2007). Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Management Science, 53(4), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0683spa
dc.relation.referencesLorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4<317::AID-SMJ28>3.0.CO;2-3spa
dc.relation.referencesMariotti, S., Piscitello, L., & Elia, S. (2014). Local externalities and ownership choices in foreign acquisitions by multinational enterprises. Economic Geography, 90(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12039spa
dc.relation.referencesMenghinello, S., De Propris, L., & Driffield, N. (2010). Industrial districts, inward foreign investment and regional development. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq012spa
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, K. E., & Estrin, S. (2001). Brownfield entry in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490985spa
dc.relation.referencesNachum, L., & Keeble, D. (2003). Neo-Marshallian clusters and global networks: The linkages of media firms in central London. Long Range Planning, 36(5), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(03)00114-6spa
dc.relation.referencesØstergaard, C. R., & Park, E. (2015). What makes clusters decline? A study on disruption and evolution of a high-tech cluster in Denmark. Regional Studies, 49(5), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1015975spa
dc.relation.referencesPhelps, N. A., & Fuller, C. (2016). Inertia and change in multinational enterprise subsidiary capabilities: An evolutionary economic geography framework. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv002spa
dc.relation.referencesPiore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. Basic Books.spa
dc.relation.referencesRugman, A. M., Nguyen, Q. T., & Wei, Z. (2016). Rethinking the literature on the performance of Chinese multinational enterprises. Management and Organization Review, 12(1), 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2016.13spa
dc.relation.referencesSaxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesScott, A. J. (1992). The collective order of flexible production agglomerations: Lessons for local economic development policy and strategic choice. Economic Geography, 68(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/144183spa
dc.relation.referencesSingh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349spa
dc.relation.referencesSlangen, A., & Hennart, J. F. (2007). Greenfield or acquisition entry: A review of the empirical foreign establishment mode literature. Journal of International Management, 13(4), 403–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2007.08.001spa
dc.subject.proposalMultinational enterpriseseng
dc.subject.proposalMarshallian industrial districteng
dc.subject.proposalTacit knowledgeeng
dc.subject.proposalRecruitingeng
dc.subject.proposalFootweareng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftspa
dc.relation.citationissue8spa
dc.relation.citationvolume56spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_b1a7d7d4d402bccespa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Artículos científicos [2730]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)