Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Communities of practice and their lifecycle strategy: systematic review from PRISMA guidelines

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.contributor.authorValbuena Antolínez, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorVernaza Trujillo, Mario Alfonso
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T15:07:52Z
dc.date.available2023-01-23T15:07:52Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-22
dc.identifier.citationValbuena Antolínez, S., & Vernaza Trujillo, M. (2023). Comunidades de práctica y su estrategia según etapa de ciclo de vida: revisión sistemática desde directrices PRISMA. Económicas CUC, 44(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.44.1.2023.Org.5spa
dc.identifier.issn0120-3932spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9797
dc.description.abstractLas comunidades de práctica (CoPs) son un mecanismo para la gestión del conocimiento que requiere el desarrollo de una estrategia, para cumplir sus objetivos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue verificar las características de las CoPs y sus estrategias de dinamización en sus diferentes etapas del ciclo de vida: creación, cohesión, madurez y estabilidad, por medio de un análisis de la evidencia reportada en la literatura académica. La metodología fue una revisión sistemática de literatura, de acuerdo con PRISMA, las bases de datos consultadas fueron: EBSCO (Academic Source, Business, Education), Scielo, Dialnet y Proquest. Como resultado fueron seleccionados 23 casos que permiten demostrar que el diseño de una CoP deberá ser incremental, soportado en el conocimiento de los miembros, desde procesos de aprendizaje situado y experimental, partiendo de las metas individuales de sus miembros para llegar a una negociación de consensos que benefician a las organizaciones y comunidades que las contienen. La estrategia de una CoP debe tener como referente el ciclo de vida, el cual orienta el diagnóstico, el diseño de planes de acción y la evaluación para lograr la estabilización de las CoP para el avance y ventaja competitiva a partir de una prácticaspa
dc.description.abstractCommunities of practice (CoPs) are a mechanism for knowledge management that requires the development of a strategy, to meet its objectives. The objective of this study was to verify the characteristics of the CoPs and their strategies of dynamization in their different stages of the life cycle: creation, cohesion, maturity and stability, through an analysis of the evidence reported in the academic literature. The methodology was a systematic literature review under the PRISMA methodology, the databases consulted were: EBSCO (Academic Source, Business, Education), Scielo, Dialnet and Proquest. As a result, 23 cases were selected to demonstrate that the design should be incremental, supported by the knowledge of the members, from processes of located and experimental learning, starting from the individual goals of its membersto reach a consensus negotiation that benefits the organizations and communities that contain them. The strategy of a CoP should have as its reference the life cycle, which guides the diagnosis, the design of action pleng
dc.format.extent23 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2023 Sandra Valbuena Antolinez, Mario Vernaza Trujillospa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/economicascuc/article/view/4321spa
dc.titleComunidades de práctica y su estrategia según etapa de ciclo de vida: revisión sistemática desde directrices PRISMAspa
dc.titleCommunities of practice and their lifecycle strategy: systematic review from PRISMA guidelineseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.17981/econcuc.44.1.2023.Org.5
dc.identifier.eissn2382-3860spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placeColombiaspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEconómicas CUCspa
dc.relation.referencesAdelle, C. (2019). Creating knowledge democracy in South Africa: The role of communities of practice. South African Journal of Science, 115(7–8), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/5888spa
dc.relation.referencesAkinyemi, A. F., Rembe, S., Shumba, J., & Adewumi, T. M. (2019). Collaboration and mutual support as processes established by communities of practice to improve continuing professional teachers’ development in high schools. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1685446spa
dc.relation.referencesAljuwaiber, A. (2016). Communities of practice as an initiative for knowledge sharing in business organisations: a literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2015-0494spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Shahrani, F., & Mohammad, H. (2014). Conceptual model of successful educational online community of practice for Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(9), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i9.3864spa
dc.relation.referencesAuer, A. M., Hanson, P., Brady-Fryer, B., Alati-It, J., & Johnson, A. L. (2020). Communities of practice in Alberta Health Services: Advancing a learning organisation. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(86), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00603-yspa
dc.relation.referencesAustin, E. J., LeRouge, C., Lee, J. R., Segal, C., Sangameswaran, S., Heim, J., Lober, W. B., Hartzler, A. L., & Lavallee, D. C. (2021). A learning health systems approach to integrating electronic patient-reported outcomes across the health care organization. Learning Health Systems, 5(4), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10263spa
dc.relation.referencesAwah, P. K., Boock, A. U., Mou, F., Koin, J. T., Anye, E. M., Noumen, D., & Nichter, M. (2018). Developing a Buruli ulcer community of practice in Bankim, Cameroon: A model for Buruli ulcer outreach in Africa. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 12(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006238spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrero Fernández, B., Segovia, J. D., & Fernández Gálvez, J. de D. (2020). Liderazgo intermedio y desarrollo de comunidades de práctica profesional: Lecciones emergentes de un estudio de caso. Psicoperspectivas Individo y Sociedad, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol19-issue1-fulltext-1751spa
dc.relation.referencesBedoya González, J. R., Betancourt Cardona, M. O., & Villa Montoya, F. L. (2017). Creación de una comunidad de práctica para la formación de docentes en la integración de las TIC a los procesos de aprendizaje y enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 23(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v23n01a09spa
dc.relation.referencesBertolazo, T., Rejane, S., & Tenoría, N. (2020). Knowledge management: an exploratory study for knowledge transfer in a university. Conhecimento& Diversidade, 12(28), 70–85. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v12i28.7691spa
dc.relation.referencesBueno, E., Salmador, P., & Merino, C. (2008). Génesis, concepto y desarrollo del capital intelectual en la economía del conocimiento: Una reflexión sobre el Modelo Intellectus y sus aplicaciones. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 26(2), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v26i2.5424spa
dc.relation.referencesCantero, N., & Pantoja Vallejo, A. (2018). Los retos de la dirección escolar en los centros comunidades de aprendizaje de andalucía. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 29(3), 61–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.29.num.3.2018.23321spa
dc.relation.referencesChu, K. W. (2016). Beginning a journey of knowledge management in a secondary school. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2015- 0155spa
dc.relation.referencesCoombs, J., Thomas, M., Rush, N., & Martin, E. (2017). A Community of Practice Approach to Delivering Research Support Services in a Post-92 Higher Education Institution: A Reflective Case Study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(2–3), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1329750spa
dc.relation.referencesCoughlan, P., Hargaden, V., Coghlan, D., Idris, A., & Åhlström, P. (2018). The role of OM EDEN in building the EurOMA community. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(8), 1664–1682. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2017-0353spa
dc.relation.referencesCristol, D. (2017). Les communautés d’apprentissage : apprendre ensemble. L’Harmattan « Savoirs », 1(43), 10–55. https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.043.0009spa
dc.relation.referencesde Araujo Pereira, V. R., & Massao Hayahi, C. R. (2016). Comunidade de prática o ensino superior. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Em Educação, 11(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/DOI:10.21723/riaee.2016.v11.n1.p204 dspa
dc.relation.referencesde Carvalho-Filho, M. A., Tio, R. A., & Steinert, Y. (2020). Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Medical Teacher, 42(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1552782spa
dc.relation.referencesde Oliveira Gonçalves, P. S., dos Santos Lopes, M., da Silva, L. F., & da silva, D. (2015). Proposição Do Modelo Dtc Para Gestão Do Conhecimento Em Empresas De Consultoria Em Tecnologia De Informação. Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 8(4), 650–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465910754spa
dc.relation.referencesde Souza Machado, R., Fleig, L., & Carnevale De Almeida, I. (2020). O uso de ferramentas tecnológicas como comunidades de práticas por docentes de uma rede particular de ensino. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología En Educación y Educación En Tecnología, 25, 21–30. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1850- 99592020000100003&script=sci_arttext&tlng=ptspa
dc.relation.referencesDee, J. R., & Leišytė, L. (2016). Organizational Learning in Higher Education Institutions: Theories, Frameworks, and a Potential Research Agenda. En Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 31, pp. 275–348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 26829-3_6spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte, V. D. V., Gazquez, A. H., Massuda, E. M., & Macuch, R. D. S. (2020). Comunidades de pratica em saúde - análise da plataforma online do Ministério da Saúde Brasileiro. Revista de Gestão Em Sistemas de Saúde, 9(2), 303–318. https://www.proquest.com/openview/bdc83e94d45803106b4a352e0f3f9dcb/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2037575spa
dc.relation.referencesDuffield, S. M. (2016). Application of the Syllk model wiring an organisation for the capability of an online community of practice. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(2), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2015-0052spa
dc.relation.referencesFeagan, M. L. (2018). Fostering the next generation of sustainability leadership: Graduate student experiences with ecohealth communities of practice. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(4), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2016-0202spa
dc.relation.referencesFingrut, W., Beck, L. A., & Lo, D. (2018). Building an oncology community of practice to improve cancer care. Current Oncology, 25(6), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4087spa
dc.relation.referencesFreeburg, D. (2018). Going beyond the text: Turning classrooms into communities of practice to uncover and create noncanonical knowledge. Education for Information, 34(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-189007spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Valcárcel, A., González Rodero, L. M., Basilotta Gómez-Pablos, V., & Martín del Pozo, M. (2018). REUNI+D: una red universitaria para la construcción colaborativa de conocimiento. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20605spa
dc.relation.referencesHandzic, M., Bratianu, C., & Bolisani, E. (2021). Scientific Associations as Communities of Practice for Fostering Collaborative Knowledge Building: Case Study of IAKM. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.19.2.2369spa
dc.relation.referencesHermanrud, I. (2017). Best Fit KM: Linking Communities of Practice to an Innovation Strategy. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/https://academicpublishing.org/index.php/ejkm/article/view/1094spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Soto, R., Gutiérrez-Ortega, M., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2021). Key factors in knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities of practice: A systematic review. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22715spa
dc.relation.referencesJagasia, J., Baul, U., & Mallik, D. (2015). A Framework for Communities of Practice in Learning Organizations. Business Perspectives and Research, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533714551861spa
dc.relation.referencesJeffs, L., McShane, J., Flintoft, V., White, P., Indar, A., Maione, M., Lopez, A. J., BookeyBassett, S., & Scavuzzo, L. (2016). Contextualizing learning to improve care using collaborative communities of practices. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1566-4spa
dc.relation.referencesKaternyak, I., Loboda, V., & Kulya, M. (2018). eLearning within the Community of Practice for sustainable development. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 8(3), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2018-0030spa
dc.relation.referencesKimble, C. (2020). Successful knowledge management in high-sociability organizations. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39(3), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21993spa
dc.relation.referencesLacasta Tintorer, D., Flayeh Beneyto, S., Manresa, J. M., Torán-Monserrat, P., Jiménez-Zarco, A., Torrent-Sellens, J., & Saigí-Rubió, F. (2015). Understanding the discriminant factors that influence the adoption and use of clinical communities of practice: The ECOPIH case. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1036-4spa
dc.relation.referencesLache, L., León, A. P., Bravo, E., Becerra, L. E., & Forero, D. (2016). Las tecnologías de información y comunicación como prácticas de referencia en la gestión de conocimiento: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 15(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v15n1-2016003spa
dc.relation.referencesLave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. En Perspectives on socially shared cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 63–82). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-003spa
dc.relation.referencesLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Vol. 1).spa
dc.relation.referencesLehtovaara, J., Seppänen, O., Peltokorpi, A., Lehtovaara, J., & Seppänen, O. (2019). Improving the learning of Design Management Operations by Exploiting Production’s Feedback: Design Science Approach. Design Science Approach Lean Construction Journal, 64–75. https://leanconstruction.org/resources/lean-construction-journal/lcj-back-issues/2019-issue/spa
dc.relation.referencesMacpherson, A., Kiersch, C., & Antonacopoulou, E. (2019). Can senior management sustain engagement and identification to support learning? Designing communities and defining goals. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA07-2019-0136spa
dc.relation.referencesMailloux, D., & Lacharité, C. (2020). Beyond new public management: Empowering communitybased organisations. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(8), 2571–2588. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22435spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Bravo, M. C., Chalezquer Sádaba, C., & Serrano Puche, J. (2018). Desarrollo de competencias digitales en comunidades virtuales: un análisis de ScolarTIC. Prisma Social, 20, 129–159. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/2318spa
dc.relation.referencesMosala-Bryant, N. N., & Hoskins, R. G. (2017). Motivational theory and knowledge sharing in the public service. South African Journal of Information Management, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.772spa
dc.relation.referencesMurnane, S., & Browne, A. (2016). From experience to knowledge in professional IT management education: exploring the applicability of classroom learning to real-life contexts. Irish Journal of Management, 35(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijm-2016-0012spa
dc.relation.referencesMusteen, M., Curran, R., Arroteia, N., Ripollés, M., & Blesa, A. (2018). A Community of Practice Approach to Teaching International Entrepreneurship. Administrative Sciences, 8(4), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8040056spa
dc.relation.referencesNicolae, M., & Nicolae, E. E. (2015). The quality of the educational process at university department level-A community of practice view. Amfiteatru Economic Recommends AE, 17(39), 815–822. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/168949/1/aej-v17-i39-p0815.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesOgbamichael, H. B., & Warden, S. (2018). Information and knowledge sharing within virtual communities of practice. SA Journal of Information Management, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v20i1.956spa
dc.relation.referencesPage, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71spa
dc.relation.referencesPerrott, B. (2015). Including Consumers in the Organisational Knowledge Network. Knowledge and Process Management, 22(4), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1492spa
dc.relation.referencesPonsford, R., Ford, J., Korjonen, H., Hughes, E., Keswani, A., Pliakas, T., & Egan, M. (2017). Competing for space in an already crowded market: A mixed methods study of why an online community of practice (CoP) for alcohol harm reduction failed to generate interest amongst the group of public health professionals at which it was aimed. Implementation Science, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0622-8spa
dc.relation.referencesRandhawa, K., Josserand, E., Schweitzer, J., & Logue, D. (2017). Knowledge collaboration between organizations and online communities: the role of open innovation intermediaries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1293–1318. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09- 2016-0423spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, L. (2021). “This Is Just What We Do”: PhD Students on Becoming Scholars in a Community of Practice. Communications in Information Literacy, 15(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.4spa
dc.relation.referencesRoulleaux, M. (2008). Organisation 2.0 - Le knowledge management nouvelle génération (Groupe Eyrolles). Éditions d’Organisation. http://livre21.com/LIVREF/F34/F034080.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesSeyednazari, N., Maleki Avarsin, S., & Yari Haj Atalou, J. (2018). Developing Communities of Practice Model to Enhance Knowledge and Improve learning among Faculty Members (Case Study: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences). Research and Development in Medical Education, 7(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2018.017spa
dc.relation.referencesShaw, L., Jazayeri, D., Kiegaldie, D., & Morris, M. (2021). Virtual communities of practice to improve clinical outcomes in healthcare: Protocol for a 10-year scoping review. BMJ Open, 11(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046998spa
dc.relation.referencesSigala, P., Ruiz-Guerrero, A., & Zurutuza Roaro, L. M. (2019). Improving the Praxis of Conversation Club Leaders in a Community of Practice: A Case Study in a Self-Access Centre. SiSAL Journal, 10(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37237/100204spa
dc.relation.referencesSpangler, S. C., Skovira, R. J., & Kohun, F. G. (2015). Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management Key Factors in a Successful Knowledge Management Model. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(1), 51–60. http://www.iiakm.org/ojakm/articles/2015/volume3_1/OJAKM_Volume3_1pp51-60.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesStaempfli, A., Tov, E., Kunz, R., Tschopp, D., & Stamm, S. E. (2016). Improving professionalism through reflection and discourse in communities of practice: The key situations in social work model and project. Journal of Practice Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 59–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v14i2.940spa
dc.relation.referencesSztangret, I. (2016). Social media as a just-in-time-marketing--knowledge-diffusion tool on the example of it sector. Oeconomia, 15(4), 157–169. https://www.ceeol.com/search/articledetail?id=588603spa
dc.relation.referencesTan, C. N. L., & Ramayah, T. (2018). Exploring the individual, social and organizational predictors of knowledge-sharing behaviours among communities of practice of SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20(3), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-09-2017-0071spa
dc.relation.referencesVieira, M. C. (2019). Comunidades de práticas como espaços de formação inicial na educação de jovens e adultos. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Em Educação, 14(3), 1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v14i3.11139spa
dc.relation.referencesWaris, M. M., Sanin, C., & Szczerbicki, E. (2019). Establishing intelligent enterprise through community of practice for product innovation. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 37(6), 7169–7178. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179329spa
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning as a social system. En Systems Thinker," (pp. 1–10). https://participativelearning.org/pluginfile.php/636/mod_resource/content/3/Learningasasocia lsystem.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge (Vol. 1). Harvard Business School Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWieringa, S., Engebretsen, E., Heggen, K., & Greenhalgh, T. (2018). How knowledge is constructed and exchanged in virtual communities of physicians: Qualitative study of mindlines online. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8325spa
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje situadospa
dc.subject.proposalAprendizaje organizacionalspa
dc.subject.proposalComunidades de prácticaspa
dc.subject.proposalGestión del conocimientospa
dc.subject.proposalSituated learningeng
dc.subject.proposalOrganizational learningeng
dc.subject.proposalCommunities of practiceeng
dc.subject.proposalKnowledge managementeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationendpage23spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume44spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Revistas Científicas [1682]
    Artículos de investigación publicados en revistas pertenecientes a la Editorial EDUCOSTA.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)