Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

On the relation between monocultures and ecosystem services in the Global South: a review

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorGwozdz, Wencke
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T16:34:10Z
dc.date.available2025
dc.date.available2023-03-02T16:34:10Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationAndres Suarez, Wencke Gwozdz, On the relation between monocultures and ecosystem services in the Global South: A review, Biological Conservation, Volume 278, 2023, 109870, ISSN 0006-3207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109870.spa
dc.identifier.issn006-3207spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9943
dc.description.abstractThe countries of the global south are characterized by high levels of biodiversity. In addition, these countries have suffered -and will suffer- even more ecological pressures due to agricultural production, mainly monocultures. When considering areas of high biodiversity with highly intensive agricultural systems, the scientific literature highlights the role provided by Ecosystem Services (ES) both to monocultures and from monocultures to their contexts. In this sense, the objective of this paper is to provide a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to understand the relationship between monocultures and ES in the global south. Furthermore, in this research we provide a context analysis to broaden the understanding of the implications of monocultures in this region. We provide correlations between trends in monocultures harvested areas and forest cover in the countries identified through the SLR. Our SLR identified information from 15 countries and 11 monocultures. We found several negative correlations between harvested area and forest cover, mainly in megadiverse countries. In addition, we depicted trade-offs and synergies related to monocultures. We conclude that more research is needed in this regard, especially since there is great interest in monocultures for economic development in the global south, and this area will support world food production in the future.eng
dc.format.extent11 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherElsevier BVspa
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.eng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320722004232spa
dc.titleOn the relation between monocultures and ecosystem services in the Global South: a revieweng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109870
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2917spa
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBiological Conservationspa
dc.relation.referencesAizen et al., 2019 M.A. Aizen, S. Aguiar, J.C. Biesmeijer, L.A. Garibaldi, D.W. Inouye, C. Jung, D.J. Martins, R. Medel, C.L. Morales, H. Ngo, A. Pauw, R.J. Paxton, A. Sáez, C.L. Seymour Global agricultural productivity is threatened by increasing pollinator dependence without a parallel increase in crop diversification Glob. Chang. Biol., 25 (10) (2019), pp. 3516-3527, 10.1111/gcb.14736spa
dc.relation.referencesAlmestad, 2015 K. Almestad Natural resources The Handbook of EEA Law, iii (2015), pp. 763-772, 10.1007/978-3-319-24343-6_35spa
dc.relation.referencesAmira et al., 2018 N. Amira, T. Rinalfi, B. Azhar Effects of intensive rice production practices on avian biodiversity in Southeast Asian managed wetlands Wetl. Ecol. Manag., 26 (5) (2018), pp. 865-877, 10.1007/s11273-018-9614-yspa
dc.relation.referencesAnand et al., 2010 M.O. Anand, J. Krishnaswamy, A. Kumar, A. Bali Sustaining biodiversity conservation in human-modified landscapes in the Western Ghats: remnant forests matter Biol. Conserv., 143 (10) (2010), pp. 2363-2374, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.01.013spa
dc.relation.referencesAntle and Stoorvogel, 2006 J.M. Antle, J.J. Stoorvogel Predicting the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture Am. J. Agric. Econ., 88 (5) (2006), pp. 1174-1180spa
dc.relation.referencesAraujo et al., 2021 H.F.P.d. Araujo, C.C.C. Machado, F.G.C. Pareyn, N.F.F.d. Nascimento, L.D.A. Araújo, L.A.d.A.P. Borges, B.A. Santos, R.M. Beirigo, A. Vasconcellos, B.de O. Dias, F. Alvarado, J.M.C.da Silva A sustainable agricultural landscape model for tropical drylands Land Use Policy, 100 (2021), 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104913spa
dc.relation.referencesAustin, 2010 K.F. Austin Soybean exports and deforestation from a world-systems perspective: a cross-national investigation of comparative disadvantage Sociol. Q., 51 (3) (2010), pp. 511-536, 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01180.xspa
dc.relation.referencesBarbier, 2004 E. Barbier Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries Am. J. Agric. Econ., 86 (5) (2004), pp. 1347-1353spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrio et al., 2013 I.C. Barrio, C.G. Bueno, R. Villafuerte, F.S. Tortosa Rabbits, weeds and crops: can agricultural intensification promote wildlife conflicts in semiarid agro-ecosystems? J. Arid Environ., 90 (2013), pp. 1-4, 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.10.016spa
dc.relation.referencesBlary et al., 2021 C. Blary, C. Kerbiriou, I. Le Viol, K. Barré Assessing the importance of field margins for bat species and communities in intensive agricultural landscapes Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 319 (May) (2021), 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107494spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd et al., 2001 W. Boyd, W.S. Prudham, R.A. Schurman Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature Soc. Nat. Resour., 14 (7) (2001), pp. 555-570, 10.1080/08941920120686spa
dc.relation.referencesBraat, 2018 L. Braat Five reasons why the Science publication “Assessing nature's contributions to people” (Diaz et al. 2018) would not have been accepted in Ecosystem Services Ecosyst. Serv., 30 (2018), pp. 2017-2018, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.002spa
dc.relation.referencesBunker, 1986 S. Bunker Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, And the Failure of the Modern State Vol. 66, University of Illinois Press (1986), 10.2307/2515502spa
dc.relation.referencesBurkhard et al., 2015 B. Burkhard, A. Müller, F. Müller, V. Grescho, Q. Anh, G. Arida, J.V.J. Bustamante, H. Van Chien, K.L. Heong, M. Escalada, L. Marquez, D. Thanh Truong, S.B. Villareal, J. Settele Land cover-based ecosystem service assessment of irrigated rice cropping systems in southeast Asia-an explorative study Ecosyst.Serv., 14 (2015), pp. 76-87, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.005spa
dc.relation.referencesCarlson, 2018 C. Carlson Rethinking the agrarian question: agriculture and underdevelopment in the Global South J. Agrar. Chang., 18 (4) (2018), pp. 703-721, 10.1111/joac.12258spa
dc.relation.referencesCely-gómez et al., 2021 M.A. Cely-gómez, D. Castillo-figueroa, J. Pérez- Bat assemblage in an oil palm plantation from the Colombian Llanos foothills 32(1) (2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesChabert and Sarthou, 2020 A. Chabert, J.P. Sarthou Conservation agriculture as a promising trade-off between conventional and organic agriculture in bundling ecosystem services Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 292 (2020), 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106815spa
dc.relation.referencesCreutzig et al., 2019 F. Creutzig, C. Bren D’Amour, U. Weddige, S. Fuss, T. Beringer, A. Gläser, M. Kalkuhl, J.C. Steckel, A. Radebach, O. Edenhofer Assessing human and environmental pressures of global land-use change 2000–2010 Glob.Sustain., 2 (2019), pp. 1-17, 10.1017/sus.2018.15spa
dc.relation.referencesDavidson, 2005 S. Davidson Shade coffee agro-ecosystems in Mexico: a synopsis of the environmental services and socio-economic considerations J. Sustain. For., 21 (1) (2005), pp. 81-95, 10.1300/J091v21n01_05spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Beenhouwer et al., 2013 M. De Beenhouwer, R. Aerts, O. Honnay A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 175 (2013), pp. 1-7, 10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDefries et al., 2010 R.S. Defries, T. Rudel, M. Uriarte, M. Hansen Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century Nat. Geosci., 3 (3) (2010), pp. 178-181, 10.1038/ngeo756 View article View in ScopusGoogle Scholarspa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz et al., 2018 B.S. Díaz, U. Pascual, M. Stenseke, B. Martín-lópez, R.T. Watson, Z. Molnár, R. Hill, K.M.A. Chan, I.A. Baste, K.A. Brauman, S. Polasky, A. Church, M. Lonsdale, A. Larigauderie, P.W. Leadley, P.E. Alexander, V. Oudenhoven, F.Van Der Plaat, M. Schröter, Y. Shirayama Assessing nature's contributions to people Science, 359 (6373) (2018)spa
dc.relation.referencesDobrovolski et al., 2011 R. Dobrovolski, J.A.F. Diniz-Filho, R.D. Loyola, P. De Marco Júnior Agricultural expansion and the fate of global conservation priorities Biodivers. Conserv., 20 (11) (2011), pp. 2445-2459, 10.1007/s10531-011-9997-zspa
dc.relation.referencesDolezal et al., 2019 A.G. Dolezal, A.L.S. Clair, G. Zhang, A.L. Toth, M.E. O'Neal Native habitat mitigates feast–famine conditions faced by honey bees in an agricultural landscape Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 116 (50) (2019), pp. 25147-25155, 10.1073/pnas.1912801116spa
dc.relation.referencesDolezal et al., 2019 A.G. Dolezal, A.L.S. Clair, G. Zhang, A.L. Toth, M.E. O'Neal Native habitat mitigates feast–famine conditions faced by honey bees in an agricultural landscape Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 116 (50) (2019), pp. 25147-25155, 10.1073/pnas.1912801116spa
dc.relation.referencesDominik et al., 2017 C. Dominik, R. Seppelt, F.G. Horgan, L. Marquez, J. Settele, T. Václavík Regional-scale effects override the influence of fine-scale landscape heterogeneity on rice arthropod communities Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 246 (October 2016) (2017), pp. 269-278, 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.011spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis and Ramankutty, 2008 E.C. Ellis, N. Ramankutty Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world Front. Ecol. Environ., 6 (8) (2008), pp. 439-447, 10.1890/070062spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis et al., 2010 E.C. Ellis, K.K. Goldewijk, S. Siebert, D. Lightman, N. Ramankutty Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 19 (5) (2010), pp. 589-606, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.xspa
dc.relation.referencesEllis et al., 2019 E.C. Ellis, U. Pascual, O. Mertz Ecosystem services and nature's contribution to people: negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 38 (June) (2019), pp. 86-94, 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001spa
dc.relation.referencesEnríquez-Acevedo et al., 2020 T. Enríquez-Acevedo, J. Pérez-Torres, C. Ruiz-Agudelo, A. Suarez Seed dispersal by fruit bats in Colombia generates ecosystem services Agron. Sustain. Dev., 40 (6) (2020), p. 45, 10.1007/s13593-020-00645-0spa
dc.relation.referencesFahrig, 2003 L. Fahrig Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34 (2003), pp. 487-515, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2021 FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAOSTATS: crops and livestock products https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesFelipe-Lucia et al., 2020 M.R. Felipe-Lucia, S. Soliveres, C. Penone, M. Fischer, C. Ammer, S. Boch, R.S. Boeddinghaus, M. Bonkowski, F. Buscot, A.M. Fiore-Donno, K. Frank, K. Goldmann, M.M. Gossner, N. Hölzel, M. Jochum, E. Kandeler, V.H. Klaus, T. Kleinebecker, S. Leimer, E. Allan, … Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 117 (45) (2020), pp. 28140-28149, 10.1073/pnas.2016210117spa
dc.relation.referencesFoley et al., 2005 J.A. Foley, R. DeFries, G.P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S.R. Carpenter, F.S. Chapin, M.T. Coe, G.C. Daily, H.K. Gibbs, J.H. Helkowski, T. Holloway, E.A. Howard, C.J. Kucharik, C. Monfreda, J.A. Patz, I.C. Prentice, N. Ramankutty, P.K. Snyder Global consequences of land use Science, 309 (5734) (2005), pp. 570-574, 10.1126/science.1111772spa
dc.relation.referencesFoley et al., 2011 J.A. Foley, N. Ramankutty, K.A. Brauman, E.S. Cassidy, J.S. Gerber, M. Johnston, N.D. Mueller, C. O’Connell, D.K. Ray, P.C. West, C. Balzer, E.M. Bennett, S.R. Carpenter, J. Hill, C. Monfreda, S. Polasky, J. Rockström, J. Sheehan, S. Siebert, D.P.M. Zaks, …Solutions for a cultivated planet Nature, 478 (7369) (2011), pp. 337-342, 10.1038/nature10452spa
dc.relation.referencesFranco et al., 2022 S. Franco, B. Pancino, A. Martella, T. De Gregorio Assessing the presence of a monoculture: from definition to quantification Agriculture, 12 (9) (2022), p. 1506, 10.3390/agriculture12091506spa
dc.relation.referencesGibbs et al., 2010 H.K. Gibbs, A.S. Ruesch, F. Achard, M.K. Clayton, P. Holmgren, N. Ramankutty, J.A. Foley Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 107 (38) (2010), pp. 16732-16737, 10.1073/pnas.0910275107spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson et al., 2011 L. Gibson, T.M. Lee, L.P. Koh, B.W. Brook, T.A. Gardner, J. Barlow, C.A. Peres, C.J.A. Bradshaw, W.F. Laurance, T.E. Lovejoy, N.S. Sodhi Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity Nature, 478 (7369) (2011), pp. 378-381, 10.1038/nature10425spa
dc.relation.referencesGivens et al., 2019 J.E. Givens, X. Huang, A.K. Jorgenson Ecologically unequal exchange: a theory of global environmental injustice Sociol. Compass, 13 (5) (2019), pp. 1-15, 10.1111/soc4.12693spa
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves-Souza et al., 2020 D. Gonçalves-Souza, P.H. Verburg, R. Dobrovolski Habitat loss, extinction predictability and conservation efforts in the terrestrial ecoregions Biol. Conserv., 246 (February) (2020), Article 108579, 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108579spa
dc.relation.referencesGrab et al., 2018 H. Grab, B. Danforth, K. Poveda, G. Loeb Landscape simplification reduces classical biological control and crop yield Ecol. Appl., 28 (2) (2018), pp. 348-355, 10.1002/eap.1651spa
dc.relation.referencesGrant and Booth, 2009 M.J. Grant, A. Booth A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies Health Info. Libr. J ., 26 (2) (2009), pp. 91-108, 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xspa
dc.relation.referencesHerbst et al., 2020 D.F. Herbst, L.C. Gerhardinger, D.A. Vila-Nova, F.G. de Carvalho, N. Hanazaki Integrated and deliberative multidimensional assessment of a subtropical coastal-marine ecosystem (Babitonga bay, Brazil) Ocean Coast. Manag., 196 (July 2019) (2020), Article 105279, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105279 Issue 3spa
dc.relation.referencesHodara and Poggio, 2016 K. Hodara, S.L. Poggio Frogs taste nice when there are few mice: do dietary shifts in barn owls result from rapid farming intensification? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 230 (2016), pp. 42-46, 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.027spa
dc.relation.referencesJackson et al., 2007 L.E. Jackson, U. Pascual, T. Hodgkin Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 121 (3) (2007), pp. 196-210, 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.017spa
dc.relation.referencesKadykalo et al., 2019 A.N. Kadykalo, M.D. López-rodriguez, J. Ainscough, H. Ryu, G. Ávila-flores, S. Le, C. Marcia, L. Nilsson, S. Rana, P. Sarkar, K.J. Sevecke, Z.V. Harmáčková, A.N. Kadykalo, M.D. López-rodriguez, J. Ainscough, N. Droste, H. Ryu, G. Ávila-flores, S. Le, Z.V. Harmáčková, … Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature's contributions to people’ Ecosyst.People, 15 (1) (2019), pp. 269-287, 10.1080/26395916.2019.1669713spa
dc.relation.referencesKenter, 2018 J.O. Kenter IPBES: don't throw out the baby whilst keeping the bathwater; put people's values central, not nature's contributions Ecosyst.Serv., 33 (March) (2018), pp. 40-43, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.002spa
dc.relation.referencesKong et al., 2021 X. Kong, Z. Zhou, L. Jiao Hotspots of land-use change in global biodiversity hotspots Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 174 (July) (2021), Article 105770, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105770spa
dc.relation.referencesKremen and Miles, 2012 C. Kremen, A. Miles Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: benefits, externalities, and trade-offs Ecol. Soc., 17 (4) (2012), p. 40spa
dc.relation.referencesLabrière et al., 2015 N. Labrière, Y. Laumonier, B. Locatelli, G. Vieilledent, M. Comptour Ecosystem services and biodiversity in a rapidly transforming landscape in northern Borneo PLoS ONE, 10 (10) (2015), pp. 1-18, 10.1371/journal.pone.0140423spa
dc.relation.referencesLambin and Meyfroidt, 2011 E.F. Lambin, P. Meyfroidt Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108 (9) (2011), pp. 3465-3472, 10.1073/pnas.1100480108 View PDF View in ScopusGoogle Scholarspa
dc.relation.referencesLaRota-Aguilera et al., 2022 M.J. LaRota-Aguilera, O.L. Delgadillo-Vargas, E. Tello Sociometabolic research in Latin America: a review on advances and knowledge gaps in agroecological trends and rural perspectives Ecol. Econ., 193 (2022), 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107310spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, 2013 A.E. Larsen Agricultural landscape simplification does not consistently drive insecticide use Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110 (38) (2013), pp. 15330-15335, 10.1073/pnas.1301900110spa
dc.relation.referencesLaurance et al., 2014 W.F. Laurance, J. Sayer, K.G. Cassman Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature TrendsEcol.Evol., 29 (2) (2014), pp. 107-116, 10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001spa
dc.relation.referencesLavelle et al., 2014 P. Lavelle, N. Rodríguez, O. Arguello, J. Bernal, C. Botero, P. Chaparro, Y. Gómez, A. Gutiérrez, M.del P. Hurtado, S. Loaiza, S.X. Pullido, E. Rodríguez, C. Sanabria, E. Velásquez, S.J. Fonte Soil ecosystem services and land use in the rapidly changing Orinoco river basin of Colombia Agric.Ecosyst.Environ., 185 (2014), pp. 106-117, 10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.020spa
dc.relation.referencesLemaire et al., 2015 G. Lemaire, F. Gastal, A. Franzluebbers, A. Chabbi Grassland-cropping rotations: an avenue for agricultural diversification to reconcile high production with environmental quality Environ. Manag., 56 (5) (2015), pp. 1065-1077, 10.1007/s00267-015-0561-6spa
dc.relation.referencesLi et al., 2020 Z. Li, X. Deng, G. Jin, A. Mohmmed, A.O. Arowolo Tradeoffs between agricultural production and ecosystem services: a case study in Zhangye, Northwest China Sci. Total Environ., 707 (2020), 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136032spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu et al., 2020 D. Liu, R. Tang, J. Xie, J. Tian, R. Shi, K. Zhang Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China Ecosyst.Serv., 41 (November 2018) (2020), Article 101054, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101054spa
dc.relation.referencesMaes et al., 2018 J. Maes, B. Burkhard, D. Geneletti Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values.A comment on the concept of nature's contributions to people (2018), 10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720spa
dc.relation.referencesMaier et al., 2021 C. Maier, W. Hebermehl, C.M. Grossmann, L. Loft, C. Mann, M. Hernández-Morcillo Innovations for securing forest ecosystem service provision in Europe – a systematic literature review Ecosyst. Serv., 52 (2021) (2021), 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101374spa
dc.relation.referencesMarquardt et al., 2013 K. Marquardt, R. Milestad, R. Porro Farmers' perspectives on vital soil-related ecosystem services in intensive swidden farming systems in the Peruvian Amazon Hum. Ecol., 41 (1) (2013), pp. 139-151, 10.1007/s10745-012-9522-3spa
dc.relation.referencesMeehan et al., 2011 T.D. Meehan, B.P. Werling, D.A. Landis, C. Gratton Agricultural landscape simplification and insecticide use in the Midwestern United States Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108 (28) (2011), pp. 11500-11505, 10.1073/pnas.1100751108spa
dc.relation.referencesMengist et al., 2020 W. Mengist, T. Soromessa, G. Legese Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: a systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps Sci. Total Environ., 702 (2020), Article 134581, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134581spa
dc.relation.referencesMeylan et al., 2017 L. Meylan, C. Gary, C. Allinne, J. Ortiz, L. Jackson, B. Rapidel Evaluating the effect of shade trees on provision of ecosystem services in intensively managed coffee plantations Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 245 (March) (2017), pp. 32-42, 10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.005spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreau et al., 2019 C. Moreau, C. Barnaud, R. Mathevet Conciliate agriculture with landscape and biodiversity conservation: a role-playing game to explore trade-offs among ecosystem services through social learning Sustainability, 11 (2) (2019), 10.3390/su11020310 (Switzerland)spa
dc.relation.referencesMori et al., 2015 A.S. Mori, A.T. Ota, S. Fujii, T. Seino, D. Kabeya, T. Okamoto, M.T. Ito, N. Kaneko, M. Hasegawa Biotic homogenization and differentiation of soil faunal communities in the production forest landscape: taxonomic and functional perspectives Oecologia, 177 (2) (2015), pp. 533-544, 10.1007/s00442-014-3111-7spa
dc.relation.referencesMorteo-Montiel et al., 2021 S. Morteo-Montiel, S.R. Simms, L. Porter-Bolland, M. Bonilla-Moheno Does the simplification of activity systems produce landscape homogenization? Environ. Dev. Sustain., 23 (4) (2021), pp. 5695-5714, 10.1007/s10668-020-00839-2spa
dc.relation.referencesMtsetfwa et al., 2018 F. Mtsetfwa, R.A. McCleery, A. Monadjem Changes in bat community composition and activity patterns across a conservation-agriculture boundary Afr. Zool., 53 (3) (2018), pp. 99-106, 10.1080/15627020.2018.1531726spa
dc.relation.referencesMumme et al., 2015 S. Mumme, M. Jochum, U. Brose, N.F. Haneda, A.D. Barnes Functional diversity and stability of litter-invertebrate communities following land-use change in Sumatra, Indonesia Biol. Conserv., 191 (2015), pp. 750-758, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.033spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers et al., 2000 N. Myers, R.a. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.a.B. Da Fonseca, J. Kent Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities Nature, 403 (2000), pp. 853-858, 10.1038/468895aspa
dc.relation.referencesNattharom et al., 2021 N. Nattharom, S. Roongtawanreongsri, S. Bumrungsri The economic value of ecosystem services of rubber-based agroforest plantations in South Thailand J.Sustain.Sci.Manag., 16 (5) (2021), pp. 247-262, 10.46754/JSSM.2021.07.016spa
dc.relation.referencesO’Connell et al., 2018 C.S. O’Connell, K.M. Carlson, S. Cuadra, K.J. Feeley, J. Gerber, P.C. West, S. Polasky Balancing tradeoffs: reconciling multiple environmental goals when ecosystem services vary regionally Environ. Res. Lett., 13 (6) (2018), 10.1088/1748-9326/aaafd8spa
dc.relation.referencesPalomo-Campesino et al., 2018 S. Palomo-Campesino, J.A. González, M. García-Llorente Exploring the connections between agroecological practices and ecosystem services: a systematic literature review Sustainability, 10 (12) (2018), 10.3390/su10124339 (Switzerland)spa
dc.relation.referencesPascual et al., 2017 U. Pascual, P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R.T. Watson, E. Başak Dessane, M. Islar, E. Kelemen, V. Maris, M. Quaas, S.M. Subramanian, H. Wittmer, A. Adlan, S.E. Ahn, Y.S. Al-Hafedh, E. Amankwah, S.T. Asah, N. Yagi, … Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 26–27 (2017), pp. 7-16, 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006spa
dc.relation.referencesPires et al., 2020 A.P.F. Pires, M.C.G. Padgurschi, P.D. De Castro, F.R. Scarano, B. Strassburg, C.A. Joly, R.T. Watson, R.De. Groot Ecosystem services or nature's contributions? Reasons behind different interpretations in Latin America Ecosyst. Serv., 42 (January) (2020), Article 101070, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101070spa
dc.relation.referencesPotapov et al., 2022 P. Potapov, S. Turubanova, M.C. Hansen, A. Tyukavina, V. Zalles, A. Khan, X.P. Song, A. Pickens, Q. Shen, J. Cortez Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century Nat. Food, 3 (1) (2022), pp. 19-28, 10.1038/s43016-021-00429-zspa
dc.relation.referencesPotschin et al., 2016 M. Potschin, E. Management, R. Haines-young, E. Management, R. Fish, H. Ecology, K. Turner, P. Fellow, E. Sciences, E. Economics, E. Anglia Routledge handbook of ecosystem services Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services (2016), 10.4324/9781315775302spa
dc.relation.referencesPower, 2010 A.G. Power Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies Philos.Trans.R.Soc.BBiol.Sci., 365 (1554) (2010), pp. 2959-2971, 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143spa
dc.relation.referencesRaudsepp-Hearne et al., 2010 C. Raudsepp-Hearne, G.D. Peterson, E.M. Bennett Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 107 (11) (2010), pp. 5242-5247, 10.1073/pnas.0907284107spa
dc.relation.referencesReed et al., 2017 J. Reed, J. van Vianen, S. Foli, J. Clendenning, K. Yang, M. MacDonald, G. Petrokofsky, C. Padoch, T. Sunderland Trees for life: the ecosystem service contribution of trees to food production and livelihoods in the tropics Forest Policy Econ., 84 (2017), pp. 62-71, 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.012spa
dc.relation.referencesRigal et al., 2018 C. Rigal, P. Vaast, J. Xu Using farmers' local knowledge of tree provision of ecosystem services to strengthen the emergence of coffee-agroforestry landscapes in southwest China PLoS ONE, 13 (9) (2018), pp. 1-18, 10.1371/journal.pone.0204046spa
dc.relation.referencesRigal et al., 2020 C. Rigal, J. Xu, G. Hu, M. Qiu, P. Vaast Coffee production during the transition period from monoculture to agroforestry systems in near optimal growing conditions, in Yunnan Province Agric. Syst., 177 (December 2018) (2020), Article 102696, 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102696spa
dc.relation.referencesRivera-Pedroza et al., 2019 L.F. Rivera-Pedroza, F. Escobar, S.M. Philpott, I. Armbrecht The role of natural vegetation strips in sugarcane monocultures: ant and bird functional diversity responses Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 284 (December 2018) (2019), Article 106603, 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106603spa
dc.relation.referencesRockström et al., 2009 J. Rockström, W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin, E. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H.J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C.A. de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P.K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, J. Foley, … Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity Ecol. Soc., 14 (2) (2009), 10.5751/ES-03180-140232spa
dc.relation.referencesShah et al., 2019 S.M. Shah, G. Liu, Q. Yang, X. Wang, M. Casazza, F. Agostinho, G.V. Lombardi, B.F. Giannetti Emergy-based valuation of agriculture ecosystem services and dis-services J. Clean. Prod., 239 (2019), Article 118019, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118019spa
dc.relation.referencesSteffen et al., 2015 W. Steffen, K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S.E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E.M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S.R. Carpenter, W. De Vries, C.A. De Wit, C. Folke, D. Gerten, J. Heinke, G.M. Mace, L.M. Persson, V. Ramanathan, B. Reyers, S. Sörlin Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet Science, 347 (6223) (2015), 10.1126/science.1259855spa
dc.relation.referencesTarigan, 2019 S.D. Tarigan Biodiversity-based ecosystem services for the management of monoculture plantation landscape using a transdisciplinary approach: a review IOP Conf.Ser.EarthEnviron.Sci., 325 (1) (2019), 10.1088/1755-1315/325/1/012013spa
dc.relation.referencesTasmim et al., 2022 S. Tasmim, J.M. Sommer, J.M. Shandra Feed me! China, agriculture, ecologically unequal exchange, and forest loss in a cross-national perspective Environ. Policy Gov., 32 (1) (2022), pp. 29-42, 10.1002/eet.1959spa
dc.relation.referencesTenius Ribeiro et al., 2019 J.C. Tenius Ribeiro, A.F. Nunes-Freitas, E.C.C. Fidalgo, M.C. Uzêda Forest fragmentation and impacts of intensive agriculture: responses from different tree functional groups PLoS ONE, 14 (8) (2019), pp. 1-19, 10.1371/journal.pone.0212725spa
dc.relation.referencesTilman et al., 2002 D. Tilman, K.G. Cassman, P.A. Matson, R. Naylor, S. Polasky Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices Nature, 418 (6898) (2002), pp. 671-677, 10.1038/nature01014spa
dc.relation.referencesTilman et al., 2011 D. Tilman, C. Balzer, J. Hill, B.L. Befort Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108 (50) (2011), pp. 20260-20264, 10.1073/pnas.1116437108spa
dc.relation.referencesTscharntke et al., 2005 T. Tscharntke, A.M. Klein, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-Dewenter, C. Thies Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management Ecol. Lett., 8 (8) (2005), pp. 857-874, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.xspa
dc.relation.referencesWade et al., 2010 A.S.I. Wade, A. Asase, P. Hadley, J. Mason, K. Ofori-Frimpong, D. Preece, N. Spring, K. Norris Management strategies for maximizing carbon storage and tree species diversity in cocoa-growing landscapes Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 138 (3–4) (2010), pp. 324-334, 10.1016/j.agee.2010.06.007spa
dc.relation.referencesWang et al., 2015 Z. Wang, D. Mao, L. Li, M. Jia, Z. Dong, Z. Miao, C. Ren, C. Song Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992–2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China Sci. Total Environ., 514 (2015), pp. 119-130, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.007spa
dc.relation.referencesWDI-World Development Indicators, 2021 WDI-World Development Indicators Forest area (% land area and forest area in sq. km) availabe at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.FRST.K2 (2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson et al., 2020 M.G. Wilson, A.E. Maggi, M.G. Castiglioni, E.A. Gabioud, M.C. Sasal Conservation of ecosystem services in argiudolls of Argentina Agriculture, 10 (12) (2020), pp. 1-21, 10.3390/agriculture10120649 (Switzerland)spa
dc.relation.referencesWinkler et al., 2021 K. Winkler, R. Fuchs, M. Rounsevell, M. Herold Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated Nat. Commun., 12 (1) (2021), pp. 1-10, 10.1038/s41467-021-22702-2spa
dc.relation.referencesWood et al., 2016 S.L.R. Wood, J.M. Rhemtulla, O.T. Coomes Intensification of tropical fallow-based agriculture: trading-off ecosystem services for economic gain in shifting cultivation landscapes? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 215 (2016), pp. 47-56, 10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.005spa
dc.relation.referencesWoon, 2013 C.Y. Woon The global south The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics (2013), pp. 323-340, 10.1177/1536504212436479spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang et al., 2007 W. Zhang, T.H. Ricketts, C. Kremen, C. Carney, S. Swinton Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture Ecol. Econ., 64 (2) (2007), pp. 253-260, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang et al., 2012 D. Zhang, Q. Min, M. Liu, S. Cheng Ecosystem service tradeoff between traditional and modern agriculture: a case study in Congjiang County, Guizhou Province, China Front.Environ.Sci.Eng.China, 6 (5) (2012), pp. 743-752, 10.1007/s11783-011-0385-4spa
dc.subject.proposalAgricultural intensificationeng
dc.subject.proposalBiodiversity hotspotseng
dc.subject.proposalDeforestationeng
dc.subject.proposalLandscape simplificationeng
dc.subject.proposalMonocropseng
dc.subject.proposalTropical foresteng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcspa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationendpage11spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume278spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
On the relation between monocu ...
Tamaño:
3.008Mb
Formato:
PDF
Descripción:
Artículo
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos científicos [3154]
    Artículos de investigación publicados por miembros de la comunidad universitaria.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)