Factores que inciden en el desempeño eficiente de una oficina de transferencia de resultados de investigación (OTRI): Caso cientech
Date
2016-01-14
2016-01-14
Metadata
Show full item record
Show full item record
Abstract
Due to the summit of the transfer of knowledge like source of economic development for the regions and countries, the TTO´s are raised as intermediary structures of out-standing importance inside the Regional Systems of Science, Technology and Innovation, which make possible the transfer of research results to the business sector and the community in general. In the Latin-American context, the emergence of the TTO obeys a very recent dynamics, where his possibilities of action have met limited for determining economic, social and cultural. This fact reveals the need to go deeply into those more relevant factors on which these could establish the bases for the achievement of a few suitable levels of performance from his early phases of operation. Based on the methodology of the case study will examine these factors in CienTech, an TTO of new creation in the Department of Atlántico - Colombia, being the result a synthesis of the most relevant factors that affect in the efficient performance of the TTO of new creation.
Referencias:
Aldridge, T., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). Does policy influence the commercialization route? Evidence from National Institutes of Health funded scientists. Research Policy, 39(5), 583–588. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.005 AUTM (2006). Licensing Activity Survey.US. AUTM Barro, S., Fernández, S. (2014). La transferencia de I+D, la innovación y el emprendimiento en las universidades. AVANCE DE RESULTADOS Berbegal, J.; Solé, F. (2011). Caracterización del proceso de valorización de la I+D universitaria. 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management: 558-567. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295 Bramwell, A., Hepburn, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2012). Growing Innovation Ecosystems : University-Industry Knowledge Transfer and Regional Economic Development in Canada By Final Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Cardozo, R., Ardichvili, A., & Strauss, A. (2010). Effectiveness of university technology transfer: an organizational population ecology view of a maturing supplier industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 173–202. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9151-1 CERT-TTT-M (2007). Key elements of Education Programme for Certified Trans-National Technology Transfer Professionals. Brussels.CCE Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(6), 936–946. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.005 Commission, E. (2004). Improving institutions for the transfer of technology from science to enterprises Expert group report Conclusions and recommendations (pp. 1–40). Dodds, John y Somersalo, Susan (2007). Practical Considerations for the Establishment of a Technology Transfer Office. WIPO Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14 ( 4): 532-550 European Union, Scientific and Technical Research Committee (2004). CREST reposrt on the application of the open method of coordination in favor of the Barcelona research investment objective European Union. Brussels. European Communities. Fong, (2010). El estudio de casos en la preparación de tesis de postgrado en el ámbito de la pyme. Extraído 25 de Julio de 2014 de file:///D:/Usuarios/CUC/Downloads/DialnetElEstudioDeCasosEnLaPreparacionDeTesisDePosgradoEn-2712302%20(3).pdf Grimm, H. M., & Jaenicke, J. (2010). What drives patenting and commerzialisation activity at East German universities? The role of new public policy, institutional environment and individual prior knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 454–477. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9195-2 Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2009). Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637–650. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4 Heisey, P. W., & Adelman, S. W. (2009). Research expenditures, technology transfer activity, and university licensing revenue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 38–60. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9129-z Krueger Jr., N., Cummings, B., & Nichols, S. (2008). From bureaucratic tech transfer to entrepreneurial tech commercialization. SSRN eLibrary. Electronic copy available athttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1288 942. Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2005). University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 253–257. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.005 Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2011). Public science and public innovation: Assessing the relationship between patenting at U.S. National Laboratories and the Bayh-Dole Act. Research Policy, 40(8), 1094–1099. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.011 Lockett, A. (2003). Technology Transfer and Universities ' Spin-Out Strategies, 185–200. Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010 Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H., & Balkin, D. B. (2005). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Research Policy, 34(7), 1058–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007 Martin, B. R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2000.). The origin and evolution of the university species, 13(3), 7–32. Muñoz Serván, P. y Muñoz Serván, I. (2001): "Intervención de la familia. Estudios de casos." En Perez Serrano, g. (coord.) op. cit. Muscio, A. (2009). What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 181–202. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9121-7 OCDE (2003). Turning Science into Business-Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organization, París. OCDE (1996): Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy, París. Oropeza, I. (2010, Noviembre 5). Copyright Licensing & Marketing Specialist. (A. Saracho, Interviewer) Pérez-Hernández, P. y Núñez, A. (2013), "Caracterización del proceso de transferencia de tecnología en Instituciones de Educación superior Mexicanas, XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica ALTEC 2013, Porto, Portugal. Pérez P., Súchil, O., Núñez, A., gonzález, G. y Hernández, J. (2011). "Transición a la universidad emprendedora: el caso del Instituto Politécnico Nacional", XVI Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica, octubre 2011, Lima Perú. Rasmussen, E. (2008). Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada. Technovation, 28(8), 506–517. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.12.002 ROESSNER, J.D. (2000): "Technology transfer", en Hill, C. (Ed.). Science and technology policy in the US. A time of change, Longman, London. Siegel, D. S., & Wessner, C. (2010). Universities and the success of entrepreneurial ventures: evidence from the small business innovation research program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 404–415. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9186-3 Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices : an exploratory study ଝ, 32, 27–48. Wolson, R. a. (2007). The role of technology transfer offices in building the South African biotechnology sector: an assessment of policies, practices and impact. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(4), 343–365. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9027-6 Young, T. A. (2010). El Establecimiento de una Oficina de Transferencia Tecnológica ( OTT ) .
Aldridge, T., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). Does policy influence the commercialization route? Evidence from National Institutes of Health funded scientists. Research Policy, 39(5), 583–588. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.005 AUTM (2006). Licensing Activity Survey.US. AUTM Barro, S., Fernández, S. (2014). La transferencia de I+D, la innovación y el emprendimiento en las universidades. AVANCE DE RESULTADOS Berbegal, J.; Solé, F. (2011). Caracterización del proceso de valorización de la I+D universitaria. 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management: 558-567. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295 Bramwell, A., Hepburn, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2012). Growing Innovation Ecosystems : University-Industry Knowledge Transfer and Regional Economic Development in Canada By Final Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Cardozo, R., Ardichvili, A., & Strauss, A. (2010). Effectiveness of university technology transfer: an organizational population ecology view of a maturing supplier industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 173–202. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9151-1 CERT-TTT-M (2007). Key elements of Education Programme for Certified Trans-National Technology Transfer Professionals. Brussels.CCE Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(6), 936–946. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.005 Commission, E. (2004). Improving institutions for the transfer of technology from science to enterprises Expert group report Conclusions and recommendations (pp. 1–40). Dodds, John y Somersalo, Susan (2007). Practical Considerations for the Establishment of a Technology Transfer Office. WIPO Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14 ( 4): 532-550 European Union, Scientific and Technical Research Committee (2004). CREST reposrt on the application of the open method of coordination in favor of the Barcelona research investment objective European Union. Brussels. European Communities. Fong, (2010). El estudio de casos en la preparación de tesis de postgrado en el ámbito de la pyme. Extraído 25 de Julio de 2014 de file:///D:/Usuarios/CUC/Downloads/DialnetElEstudioDeCasosEnLaPreparacionDeTesisDePosgradoEn-2712302%20(3).pdf Grimm, H. M., & Jaenicke, J. (2010). What drives patenting and commerzialisation activity at East German universities? The role of new public policy, institutional environment and individual prior knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 454–477. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9195-2 Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2009). Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637–650. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4 Heisey, P. W., & Adelman, S. W. (2009). Research expenditures, technology transfer activity, and university licensing revenue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 38–60. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9129-z Krueger Jr., N., Cummings, B., & Nichols, S. (2008). From bureaucratic tech transfer to entrepreneurial tech commercialization. SSRN eLibrary. Electronic copy available athttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1288 942. Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2005). University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 253–257. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.005 Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2011). Public science and public innovation: Assessing the relationship between patenting at U.S. National Laboratories and the Bayh-Dole Act. Research Policy, 40(8), 1094–1099. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.011 Lockett, A. (2003). Technology Transfer and Universities ' Spin-Out Strategies, 185–200. Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010 Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H., & Balkin, D. B. (2005). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Research Policy, 34(7), 1058–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007 Martin, B. R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2000.). The origin and evolution of the university species, 13(3), 7–32. Muñoz Serván, P. y Muñoz Serván, I. (2001): "Intervención de la familia. Estudios de casos." En Perez Serrano, g. (coord.) op. cit. Muscio, A. (2009). What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 181–202. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9121-7 OCDE (2003). Turning Science into Business-Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organization, París. OCDE (1996): Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy, París. Oropeza, I. (2010, Noviembre 5). Copyright Licensing & Marketing Specialist. (A. Saracho, Interviewer) Pérez-Hernández, P. y Núñez, A. (2013), "Caracterización del proceso de transferencia de tecnología en Instituciones de Educación superior Mexicanas, XV Congreso Latinoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica ALTEC 2013, Porto, Portugal. Pérez P., Súchil, O., Núñez, A., gonzález, G. y Hernández, J. (2011). "Transición a la universidad emprendedora: el caso del Instituto Politécnico Nacional", XVI Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica, octubre 2011, Lima Perú. Rasmussen, E. (2008). Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada. Technovation, 28(8), 506–517. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.12.002 ROESSNER, J.D. (2000): "Technology transfer", en Hill, C. (Ed.). Science and technology policy in the US. A time of change, Longman, London. Siegel, D. S., & Wessner, C. (2010). Universities and the success of entrepreneurial ventures: evidence from the small business innovation research program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 404–415. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9186-3 Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices : an exploratory study ଝ, 32, 27–48. Wolson, R. a. (2007). The role of technology transfer offices in building the South African biotechnology sector: an assessment of policies, practices and impact. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(4), 343–365. doi:10.1007/s10961-006-9027-6 Young, T. A. (2010). El Establecimiento de una Oficina de Transferencia Tecnológica ( OTT ) .
Collections