Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.contributor.authorArruabarrena, Micaela-María
dc.contributor.authorMartin, María Eugenia
dc.contributor.authorCalandri, Ismael Luis
dc.contributor.authorCorvalán, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorHelou, María-Belén
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCrivelli, Lucia
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T22:08:55Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T22:08:55Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationArruabarrena, M.-M-, Martin, M.-E., Calandri, I.-L., Corvalán, N., Helou, M.-B., Martínez, C. & Crivelli, L. (2022). Teleneuropsychological assessment in South America: A perspective from patients and neuropsychologists. Journal of Applied Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(2), e00324683. https://doi.org/10.17981/JACN.3.2.2022.05spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11323/9961
dc.description.abstractTeleneuropsychology (teleNP) in Argentina was promoted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This investigation aimed to evaluate patients’ and neuropsychologists’ satisfaction with teleNP and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of its use. 41 patients with mild cognitive impairment and 35 neuropsychologists from Argentina were surveyed. Both groups were sent a questionnaire by e-mail to evaluate their satisfaction and preferences regarding teleNP. Patients were sent the survey after being cognitively evaluated by teleNP. Outcomes reflected a 91% degree of satisfaction with teleNP, with no differences between patients and specialists (p = 0.112). Regarding patients, 50% had no predilection regarding evaluation modality, and 35.7% preferred teleNP. The main benefits identified were accessibility to remote areas (72.4%), and comfort of performing the assessment at home (57.14%). Moreover, 74.3% of practitioners reported that the principal difficulty was the patient’s lack of familiarity with the technology, and 60% a deficiency in environmental control. TeleNP cognitive evaluation has a high degree of acceptability for practitioners and patients. The main obstacles identified are network connection problems and the lack of familiarity with technology. The principal advantages come from accessing isolated areas. This suggests that this practice will remain relevant beyond the pandemic context.eng
dc.description.abstractLa teleneuropsicología (teleNP) en Argentina fue promovida por la pandemia del COVID-19. Esta investigación se propuso evaluar la satisfacción de pacientes y neuropsicólogos con la teleNP e identificar las ventajas y desventajas de su uso. Se encuestaron 41 pacientes con deterioro cognitivo leve y 35 neuropsicólogos de Argentina. A ambos grupos se les envió un cuestionario por correo electrónico para evaluar su satisfacción y preferencias respecto a la teleNP. A los pacientes se les envió la encuesta después de ser evaluados cognitivamente mediante teleNP. Los resultados reflejaron un grado de satisfacción con la teleNP del 91%, sin diferencias entre pacientes y especialistas (p = 0.112). En cuanto a los pacientes, el 50% no tenía predilección por ninguna modalidad de evaluación, y el 35.7% prefería la telePN. Los principales beneficios identificados fueron la accesibilidad a zonas remotas (72.4%), y la comodidad de realizar la evaluación en casa (57.14%). Por otra parte, el 74.3% de los profesionales informaron de que la principal dificultad era la falta de familiaridad del paciente con la tecnología, y el 60% una deficiencia en el control del entorno. La evaluación cognitiva TeleNP tiene un alto grado de aceptabilidad para los profesionales y los pacientes. Los principales obstáculos identificados son los problemas de conexión a la red y la falta de familiaridad con la tecnología. Las principales ventajas provienen del acceso a zonas aisladas. Esto sugiere que esta práctica seguirá siendo relevante más allá del contexto pandémico.spa
dc.format.extent12 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2022 Micaela Maria Arruabarrenaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistascientificas.cuc.edu.co/JACN/article/view/4683spa
dc.titleTeleneuropsychological assessment in South America: a perspective from patients and neuropsychologistseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.17981/JACN.3.2.2022.05
dc.identifier.eissn2745-0031spa
dc.coverage.regionSouth America
dc.identifier.instnameCorporación Universidad de la Costaspa
dc.identifier.reponameREDICUC - Repositorio CUCspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/spa
dc.publisher.placeColombiaspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Applied Cognitive Neurosciencespa
dc.relation.referencesBilder, R. M.; Postal, K. S.; Barisa, M.; Aase, D. M.; Cullum, C. M.; Gillaspy, S. R.; Harder, L.; Kanter, G.; Lanca, M.; Lechuga, D. M.; Morgan, J. M.; Most, R.; Puente, A. E.; Salinas, C. M. & Woodhouse, J. (2020). Inter Organizational Practice Committee Recommendations/Guidance for TeleNeuropsychology in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Archives of clinical neuropsychology: the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 35(6), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa046spa
dc.relation.referencesCalandri, I. L.; Hawkes, M. A.; Marrodan, M.; Ameriso, S. F.; Correale, J. & Allegri, R. F. (2021). Changes in the Care of Neurological Diseases During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Private Center Study in Argentina. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.613838spa
dc.relation.referencesChappell, N. L. & Zimmer, Z. (1999). Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21(5-6), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382899297648spa
dc.relation.referencesCNSS. (2010). National information assurance (IA) glossary. Retrieved from https://www.cnss.gov/cnss/spa
dc.relation.referencesCrivelli, L.; Quiroz, Y. T.; Calandri, I. L.; Martin, M. E.; Velilla, L. M.; Cusicanqui, M. I.; Coto, F.; Llibre-Rodríguez, J. J.; Armele, M.; Román, F.; Barceló, E.; Dechent, C.; Agostina, M.; Olavarría, L.; Yassuda, M. S.; Custodio, N.; Dansilio, S.; Sosa, A. L.; Acosta, D. M.; Brucki, S. M. D.; Caramelli, P.; Slachevsky, A.; Nitrini, R.; Carrillo, M. C. & Allegri, R. F. (2021). Working Group Recommendations for the Practice of Teleneuropsychology in Latin America. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 37(3), 553–567 https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab080spa
dc.relation.referencesCullum, M. C.; Hynan, L. S; Grosch, M.; Parikh, M. & Weiner, M. F. (2014). Teleneuropsychology: Evidence for Video Teleconference-Based Neuropsychological Assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(10), 1028–1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000873spa
dc.relation.referencesElwood, D. L. & Griffin, R. (1972). Individual intelligence testing without the examiner. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032416spa
dc.relation.referencesFox-Fuller, J. T.; Rizer, S.; Andersen, S. L. & Sunderaraman, P. (2022). Survey Findings About the Experiences, Challenges, and Practical Advice/Solutions Regarding Teleneuropsychological Assessment in Adults. Archives of clinical neuropsychology: the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 37(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab076spa
dc.relation.referencesGalusha-Glasscock, J. M.; Horton, D. K.; Weiner, M. F. & Cullum, C. M. (2016). Video Teleconference Administration of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Archives of clinical neuropsychology: the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 31(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acv058spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrell, K. M.; Wilkins, S. S.; Connor, M. K. & Chodosh, J. (2014). Telemedicine and the Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment: The Additive Value of Neuropsychological Assessment. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 15(8), 600–606.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.04.015spa
dc.relation.referencesMorris, A.; Goodman-Deane, J. & Brading, H. (2007). Internet use and non-use: Views of older users. Universal Access in the Information Society, 6, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0057-5spa
dc.relation.referencesRentz, D. M.; Dekhtyar, M.; Sherman, J.; Burnham, S.; Blacker, D.; Aghjayan, S. L.; Papp, K. V.; Amariglio, R. E.; Schembri, A.; Chenhall, T.; Maruff, P.; Aisen, P.; Hyman, B. T. & Sperling, R. A. (2016). The Feasibility of At-Home iPad Cognitive Testing For Use in Clinical Trials. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer´s disease, 3(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2015.78spa
dc.relation.referencesSoto-Pérez, F.; Franco, M. y Jiménez, F. (2010). Tecnologías y neuropsicología: Hacia una ciber-neuropsicología. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología, 4(2), 112–130. https://www.cnps.cl/index.php/cnps/article/view/106spa
dc.relation.referencesStricker, N. H.; Lundt, E. S.; Alden, E. C.; Albertson, S. M.; Machulda, M. M.; Kremers, W. K.; Knopman, D. S.; Petersen, R. C. & Mielke, M. M. (2020). Longitudinal Comparison of in clinic and at Home Administration of the Cogstate Brief Battery and Demonstrated Practice Effects in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer´s disease, 7(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2019.35spa
dc.relation.referencesWadsworth, H. E.; Dhima, K.; Womack, K. B.; Hart, J.; Weiner, M. F.; Hynan, L. S. & Cullum, C. M. (2018). Validity of TeleNeuropsychological Assessment in Older Patients with Cognitive Disorders. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 33(8), 1040–1045. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx140spa
dc.subject.proposalTeleneuropsychologyeng
dc.subject.proposalCOVID-19eng
dc.subject.proposalCognitive assessmenteng
dc.subject.proposalTelehealtheng
dc.subject.proposalTelemedicineeng
dc.subject.proposalTeleneuropsicologíaspa
dc.subject.proposalEvaluación cognitivaspa
dc.subject.proposalTelesaludspa
dc.subject.proposalTelemedicinaspa
dc.title.translatedEvaluación teleneuropsicológica en América del Sur: una perspectiva desde los pacientes y los neuropsicólogos
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationendpage12spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationvolume3spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Revistas Científicas [1682]
    Artículos de investigación publicados en revistas pertenecientes a la Editorial EDUCOSTA.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)